A unified analytical framework for ship domains

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 643-655

  Wang, Ning ^a   Meng, Xianyao ^a   Xu, Qingyang ^a   Wang, Zuwen ^a  

^a DALIAN MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Analytical model; Collision avoidance; Collision risk; Ship domain

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODEL; COLLISION RISK; COLLISION RISKS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DOMAIN MODEL; MARINE TRAFFIC; SIMULATION RESULT; TRAJECTORY PLANNING;

HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SHIPS;

SIMULATORS;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NAVIGATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SHIP MOTION; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY;

EID: 70350503567     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: 14697785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463309990178     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Coldwell, T. G. (1983). Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters. The Journal of Navigation, 36, 431-444.
2. Davis, P. V., Dove, M. J. and Stockel, C. T. (1980). A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas. The Journal of Navigation, 33, 215-222.
3. Davis, P. V., Dove, M. J. and Stockel, C. T. (1982). A computer simulation of multi-ship encounters. The Journal of Navigation, 35, 347-352.
4. Fujii, Y. and Tanaka, K. (1971). Traffic capacity. The Journal of Navigation, 24, 543-552.
5. Goodwin, E. M. (1975). A statistical study of ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 28, 329-341.
6. ∞-autopilots on ships. The Journal of Navigation, 55, 117-136.
7. Kao, S. L., Lee, K. T., Chang, K. Y. and Ko, M. D. (2007). A fuzzy logic method for collision avoidance in vessel traffic service. The Journal of Navigation, 60, 17-31.
8. Kijima, K. and Furukawa, Y. (2001). Design of automatic collision avoidance system using fuzzy inference. Proceeding of IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems, Glasgow, U.K.
9. Kijima, K. and Furukawa, Y. (2003). Automatic collision avoidance system using the concept of blocking area. Proceeding of IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft, Girona, Spain.
10. Lisowski, J., Rak, A. and Czechowicz, W. (2000). Neural network classifier for ship domain assessment. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 51, 399-406.
11. Pietrzykowski, Z. and Uriasz, J. (2004). The ship domain in a deep-sea area. Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries, Siguenza, Spain.
12. Pietrzykowski, Z. and Uriasz, J. (2006). Ship domain in navigational situation assessment in an open sea area. Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries, Oegstgeest, Netherlands.
13. Pietrzykowski, Z. (2008). Ship's fuzzy domain-a criterion for navigational safety in narrow fairways. The Journal of Navigation, 61, 499-514.
14. Smierzchalski, R. and Michalewicz, Z. (2000). Modelling of a ship trajectory in collision situations at sea by evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 4(3), 227-241.
15. Smierzchalski, R. (2001). On-line trajectory planning in collision situation at sea by evolutionary computation-experiments. Proceeding of IFAC Conference on Computer Applications in Marine Systems, Glasgow, U.K.
16. Szlapczynski, R. (2006). A unified measure of collision risk derived from the concept of a ship domain. The Journal of Navigation, 59, 477-490.
17. Wilson, P. A., Harris, C. J. and Hong, X. (2003). A line of sight counteraction navigation algorithm for ship encounter collision avoidance. The Journal of Navigation, 56, 111-121.
18. Zhao, J., Wu, Z. and Wang F. (1993). Comments on ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 46, 422-436.
19. Zhu, X., Xu, H. and Lin, J. (2001). Domain and its model based on neural networks. The Journal of Navigation, 54, 97-103.