A component taxonomy as a framework for computational design synthesis

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-10

  Kurtoglu, Tolga ^a   Campbell, Matthew I ^b   Arnold, Cari Bryant ^c   Stone, Robert B ^d   Mcadams, Daniel A ^e  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN SYNTHESIS; COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN TOOLS; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; ELECTROMECHANICAL COMPONENTS; GENERIC COMPONENTS; IN-BUILDINGS;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES;

TAXONOMIES;

EID: 70350503078     PISSN: 15309827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.3086032     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Strawbridge, Z., McAdams, D., and Stone, R., 2002, "A Computational Approach to Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the DETC2002/DTM-34001, Montreal, Canada.
2. Bryant, C., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Kurtoglu, T., and Campbell, M., 2005, "A Computational Technique for Concept Generation," Proceedings of the ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conference, Long Beach, CA.
3. Kurtoglu, T., Campbell, M., Gonzales, J., Bryant, C., Stone, R., and McAdams, D., 2005, "Capturing Empirically Derived Design Knowledge for Creating Conceptual Design Configurations," ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conference, Long Beach, CA.
4. Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T., 1996, "An Approach to Functional Synthesis of Mechanical Design Concepts: Theory, Applications and Emerging Research Issues," Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 10, pp. 313-331.
5. Campbell, M. I., Cagan, J., and Kotovsky, K., 1999, "A-Design: An Agent-Based Approach to Conceptual Design in a Dynamic Environment," Res. Eng. Des., 11(3), pp. 172-192.
6. Hubka, V., and Ernst Eder, W., 1984, Theory of Technical Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
7. Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1988, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
8. Suh, N., 1990, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Ullman, D., 1997, The Mechanical Design Process, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. Ulrich, K., and Eppinger, S., 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Otto, K., and Wood, K., 2001, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Liang, V., and Paredis, C. J. J, 2004, "A Port Ontology for Conceptual Design of Systems," ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 4, pp. 206-217.
13. Wallace, A. P., 1995, The Modelling of Engineering Assemblies Based on Standard Catalogue Components, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
14. Culley, S. J., and Webber, S. J., 1992, "Implementation Requirements for Electronic Standard Component Catalogues," Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 206, pp. 253-260.
15. Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., and Mullineux, G., 2005, "The Modeling of Engineering Systems for Their Computer Based Embodiment With Standard Components," ASME J. Mech. Des., 127, pp. 424-432.
16. Uschold, M., and Gruninger, M., 1996, "Ontologies: Principles, Methods, and Applications," Knowl. Eng. Rev., 11, pp. 93-136.
17. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., and Swartout, W. R., 1991, "Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing," AI Mag., 12(3), pp. 36-56.
18. Horváth, I., Dorozsmai, K., and Thernesz, V., 1994, "A Feature-Object-Based Practical Methodology for Integration of Conceptual and Morphological Design," Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design CACD '94, Lancaster University, pp. 131-149.
19. Horváth, I., Vergeest, J. S. M., and Kuczogi, G., 1998, "Development and Application of Design Concept Ontologies for Contextual Conceptualization," ASME Paper No. DETC98/CIE-5701.
20. Kitamura, Y., and Mizoguchi, R., 2003, "Ontology-Based Description of Functional Design Knowledge and Its Use in a FunctionalWay Server," Expert Sys. Applic., 24, pp. 153-166.
21. Li, Z., Anderson, D., and Ramani, K., 2005 "Ontology-Based Design Knowledge Modeling for Product Retrieval," Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2005, Melbourne, Australia.
22. Stahovich, T. F., Davis, R., and Shrobe, H., 1993, "An Ontology of Mechanical Devices," Proceedings of the 1993 AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
23. Szykman, S., Racz, J., and Sriram, R., 1999, "The Representation of Function in Computer-Based Design," Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
24. Fenves, S. J., 2001, "A Core Product Model For Representing Design Information," National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report No. NISTIR6736.
25. Terpenny, J., 1997, "An Integrated System for Functional Modeling and Configuration in Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the Seventh International Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing Conference, Middlesbrough, UK, Jun. 25-27, pp. 69-80.
26. Sikand, A., and Terpenny, J., 2004, "AWeb-Based Environment for Managing Product Knowledge," International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTSO 4), San Diego, CA.
27. Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., and Wood, K., 2002, "A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts," Res. Eng. Des., 13(2), pp. 65-82.
28. Chenhall, R. G., 1978, Nomenclature for Museum Cataloging: A System for Classifying Man-Made Objects, American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, TN.
29. The University of Missouri at Rolla, Design Knowledge Repository, http://function.basiceng.umr.edu/repository.
30. Kurtoglu, T., 2007, "A Computational Approach to Innovative Conceptual Design," Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
31. Greer, J., Stock, M. E., Stone, R., and Wood, K., 2003, "Enumerating the Component Space: First Steps Towards a Design Naming Convention for Mechanical Parts," Proceedings of the DETC2003, Chicago, IL.
32. Bryant, C., McAdams, D., Stone, R., Kurtoglu, T., and Campbell, M., 2006, "A Validation Study of an Automated Concept Generator Design Tool," ASME 2006 Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
33. Bryant, C. R., Pieper, E., Walther, B., Kurtoglu, T., Stone, R. B., McAdams, D. A., and Campbell, M. I., 2006, "Software Evaluation of an Automated Concept Generator Design Tool," 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Chicago, IL, Paper No. 2005-1758.
34. Dynasim Software, 2004, "Dymola-Dynamic Modeling Laboratory-Multiengineering Modeling and Simulation," http://www.dynasim.com/www/DymolaBrochure.pdf.
35. MSC Software, 2004, "Working Model-The World's Most Popular 2D Motion Software," http://www.krev.com/overview.html.
36. Bracewell, R. H., and Sharpe, J. E. E., 1996, "Functional Descriptions Used in Computer Support for Qualitative Scheme Generation-Schemebuilder," Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 10(4), pp. 333-346.