The Day the Dialogue Died: A Comment on Sauve v. Canada

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 105-123

  Manfredi, Christopher P ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Canada. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; Judicial review; Prisoners Legal status, laws, etc

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350493612     PISSN: None     EISSN: 28175069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.60082/2817-5069.1257     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Peter W. Hogg & Allison A. Bushell, "The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such A Bad Thing After All)" (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall L.J. 75 [" CharterDialogue"].
2. R. v. Oake, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103 at 138-39 [Oakes], cited in Belczowski1991, supra note 8 at 165.
3. Allan Hutchinson, Waiting for Coraf: A Critique of Law and Rights (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995) at 184-220
4. Peter W. Hogg, Allison A. Bushell Thornton & Wade K. Wright, "Charter Dialogue Revisited-Or 'Much Ado About Metaphors"' (2007) 45 Osgoode Hall L.J. 1 [" Charter Dialogue Revisited"].
5. Christopher P. Manfredi, "Judicial Power and the Charter. Reflections on the Activism Debate" (2004) 53 U.N.B.L.J. 185.
6. Matthew Hennigar, "Government Appeals as 'Dialogue': Expanding a Contemporary Debate" (Paper presented to the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, 30 May 2003) [unpublished].
7. Martin Shapiro, "The Giving Reasons Requirement" in Martin Shapiro & Alec Stone Sweet, eds., On Law, Politics and Judicialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 228 at 230. 4
8. Christopher P. Manfredi, Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) at 22.
9. Christopher P. Manfredi, Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1993) at 207-08. I repeated this point in the second edition, supra note 80 at 191.