Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: A comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms

Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

Volumn 7, Issue APR., 2009, Pages 304-308

  Lehette, Pascal ^a   Hernández León, Santiago ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRUSTACEA;

EID: 70350488638     PISSN: 15415856     EISSN: 15415856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2009.7.304     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alcaraz, M., E. Saiz, A. Calbet, I. Trepat, and E. Broglio. 2003. Estimating zooplankton biomass through image analysis. Mar. Biol. 143:307-315.
2. Banse, K. 1995. Zooplankton: pivotal role in the control of ocean production. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 52:265-277.
3. Bone, Q., Kapp, H., and A. C. Pierrot-Bults. 1991. Introduction and relationships of the group. In Bone, Q., H. Kapp, and A. C. Pierrot-Bults [eds.], The Biology of Chaetognaths. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1-4.
4. Dietrich, A., and G. Uhlig. 1984. Stage specific classification of copepods with automatic image analysis. Crustaceana 3:159-165.
5. Edgerton, H. E. 1981. Electronic flash sources and films for plankton photography, J. Biol. Photogr. 49:25-26.
6. Færøvig, P. J., T. Andersen, and D. O. Hessen. 2002. Image analysis of Daphnia populations: non-destructive determination of demography and biomass in cultures. Freshw. Biol. 47:1956-1962.
7. Gorsky, G., P. Guibert, and E. Valenta. 1989. The autonomous image analyzer: enumeration, measurement and identification of marine phytoplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 58:133-142.
8. Gorsky, G., and P. Grosjean. 2003. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of zooplankton samples. GLOBEC Int. Newsletter. 9:5-6.
9. Grosjean, P., M. Picheral, C. Warembourg, and G. Gorsky. 2004. Enumeration, measurement and identification of net zooplankton samples using the Zooscan digital imaging system. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 61:518-525.
10. Hernández-León, S., and I. Montero. 2006. Zooplankton biomass estimated from digitized images in Antarctic waters: a calibration exercise. J. Geophys. Res. 111:C05S03 [doi: 10.1029/2005JC002887].
11. Jeffries, H. P., and others. 1984. Automated sizing, counting and identification of zooplankton by pattern recognition. Mar. Biol. 78:329-334.
12. Le Borgne, R. 1975. Équivalences entre les mesures de biovolume, poids secs, poids sec sans cendre, carbone, azote et phosphore du mésozooplancton de l'Atlantique tropical. Cah. ORSTOM Ser. Oceanogr. 13:179-196.
13. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. New York: Elsevier, p. 853.
14. Little, W. S., and N. J. Copley. 2003. WHOI Silhouette DIGITIZER version 1.0 User's Guide. Woods Hole Oceanogr. Inst. Tech. Rep. #WHOI-2003-05, 66 pp.
15. Lovegrove, T. 1966. The determination of the dry weight of plankton and the effect of various factors on the values obtained. In H. Barnes, [ed.] Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin, p. 429-467.
16. Olney, J. E., and E. D. Houde. 1993. Evaluation of in situ silhouette photography in investigations of estuarine zooplankton and Ichthyoplankton. Bull. Mar. Sci. 52:845-872.
17. Ortner, P. B., S. R. Cumming, R. P. Aftring, and H. E. Edgerton. 1979. Silhouette photography of oceanic zooplankton. Nature 277:50-51.
18. Ortner, P. B, L. C. Hill, and H. E. Edgerton. 1981. In-situ silhouette photography of Gulf Stream zooplankton. Deep-Sea Res. 28A:1569-1576.
19. Pakhomov, E. A., P. W. Froneman, and R. Perissinotto. 2002. Salp/krill interactions in the Southern Ocean: spatial segregation and implications for the carbon flux. Deep-Sea Res. II. 49:1881-1907.
20. Postel L., H. Fock, and W. Hagen. 2000. Biomass and abundance. In Harris R. P., P. H. Wiebe, J. Lenz, H. R. Skjoldal, and M. Huntley [eds.] ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual. London: Academic Press, p. 83-192.
21. PVA. 2005. Plankton Visual Analyser (PVA) Software. http://www.azti.es.
22. Ricker, W. E. 1973. Linear regression in fishery research. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 30:409-434.
23. Rolke, M., and J. Lenz. 1984. Size structure analysis of zooplankton samples by means of an automated image analyzing system. J. Plankton Res. 6:637-645.
24. UNESCO. 1968. Zooplankton sampling. Monogr. Oceanogr. Methods. vol. 2, Paris, 174 pp.
25. Wiebe, P. H. 1988. Functional regression equations for zooplankton displacement volume, wet weight, dry weight, and carbon: a correction. Fish. Bull. 86:833-835.
26. Zooimage. 2006. A software to analyze plankton through digitized images. http://www.sciviews.org/zooimage.