Acquisition and evaluation of a dialog corpus through woz and dialog simulation techniques

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 772-777

  Griol, David ^a   Hurtado, Lluís F ^a   Segarra, Encarna ^a   Sanchis, Emilio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION MEASURES; RANDOM SELECTION; SIMULATION TECHNIQUE; WIZARD OF OZ;

EID: 70350456538     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. H. Ai and D. Litman. 2006. Comparing Real-Real, Simulated-Simulated, and Simulated-Real Spoken Dialogue Corpora. In Procs. of AAAI Workshop Statistical and Empirical Approaches for Spoken Dialogue Systems, Boston, USA.
2. H. Ai and D. J. Litman. 2007. Knowledge Consistent User Simulations for Dialog Systems. In Proc. of Interspeech'07, Antwerp, Belgium.
3. H. Ai, J. R. Tetreault, and D. J. Litman. 2007a. Comparing User Simulation Models For Dialog Strategy Learning. In Proc. of NAACL HLT'07, pages 1-4, Rochester, NY, USA.
4. Hua Ai, Antoine Raux, Dan Bohus, Maxine Eskenazi, and Diane Litman. 2007b. Comparing Spoken Dialog Corpora Collected with Recruited Subjects versus Real Users. In Proc. of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 124-131, Antwerp, Belgium.
5. J. M. Benedí, E. Lleida, A. Varona, M. J. Castro, I. Galiano, R. Justo, I. López, and A. Miguel. 2006. Design and acquisition of a telephone spontaneous speech dialogue corpus in Spanish: DIHANA. In Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'06), pages 1636-1639, Genoa, Italy.
6. Y. Esteve, C. Raymond, F. Bechet, and R. De Mori. 2003. Conceptual Decoding for Spoken Dialog systems. In Proc. of European Conference on Speech Communications and Technology (EuroSpeech'03), pages 617-620, Geneva (Switzerland).
7. R. E. Fikes and T. Kehler. 1985. The role of frame-based representation in knowledge representation and reasoning. In Communications of the ACM, volume 28, pages 904-920.
8. K. Georgila, J. Henderson, and O. Lemon. 2006. User Simulation for Spoken Dialogue Systems: Learning and Evaluation. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech/ICSLP), pages 1065-1068, Pittsburgh (USA).
9. Y. He and S. Young. 2003. A data-driven spoken language understanding system. In Proc. of ASRU'03, pages 583-588.
10. W. Minker, A. Waibel, and J. Mariani. 1999. Stocasticallybased semantic analysis. In Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA.
11. M. Minsky, 1975. The Psychology of Computer Vision, chapter A Framework for Representing Knowledge, pages 211-277. McGraw-Hill.
12. J. Schatzmann, K. Georgila, and S. Young. 2005. Quantitative Evaluation of User Simulation Techniques for Spoken Dialogue Systems. In Proc. of SIGDial Workshop'05, pages 45-54, Lisbon (Portugal).
13. F. Torres, L. F. Hurtado, F. Garćia, E. Sanchis, and E. Segarra. 2005. Error handling in a stochastic dialog system through confidence measures. In Speech Communication, pages (45): 211-229.
14. Markku Turunen, Jaakko Hakulinen, and Anssi Kainulainen. 2006. Evaluation of a Spoken Dialogue System with Usability Tests and Long-term Pilot Studies: Similarities and Differences. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech/ICSLP), pages 1057-1060, Pittsburgh, USA.
15. J. Williams and S. Young. 2007. Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes for Spoken Dialog Systems. In Computer Speech and Language 21(2), pages 393-422.
16. S. Young. 2002. The Statistical Approach to the Design of Spoken Dialogue Systems. Technical report, Cambridge University Engineering Department.