Development of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in C57BL/6J mice

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 576-581

  Narui, Yuya ^a   Minekawa, Akira ^a   Iizuka, Takashi ^a   Furukawa, Masayuki ^a   Kusunoki, Takeshi ^a   Koike, Takuji ^b   Ikeda, Katsuhisa ^a  

^a JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Development; Distortion product otoacoustic emission; Mouse

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND PRESSURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BRAIN STEM; EAR CANAL; ELECTRONICS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PRESSURE; SOUND; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70350455931     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020902858959     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abe, T., Kakehata, S., Kitani, R., Maruya, S., Navaratnam, D., et al. 2007. Developmental expression of the outer hair cell motor prestin in the mouse. J Membr Biol, 215, 49-56.
2. Brown, A.M., McDowell, B. & Forge, A. 1989. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res, 42, 143-156
3. Brownell, W.E. 1990. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 82-92.
4. Henley, C. M. 3rd, Owings, M. H., Stagner, B. B., Martin, G. K. & Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. 1990. Postnatal development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in pigmented rat. Hear Res, 43, 141-148
5. Henley, C.M. & Rybak, L.P. 1995. Ototoxicity in developing mammals. Brain Res Rev, 20, 68-90.
6. Inagaki, M., Kon, K., Suzuki, S., Kobayashi, N., Kaga, M., et al. 2006. Characteristic findings of auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emission in the Bronx waltzer mouse. Brain Dev, 28, 617-624
7. Kudo, T., Kure, S., Ikeda, K., Xia, A.P., Katori, Y., et al. 2003. Transgenic expression of a dominant-negative connexin26 causes degeneration of the organ of Corti and non-syndromic deafness. Hum Mol Genet, 12, 995-1004.
8. Lenoir, M. & Puel, J.L. 1987. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat. Hear Res, 29, 265-271
9. Li, D., Henley, C.M. & O'Malley, B.W. Jr. 1999. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cell defects in the hyt/hyt mutant mouse. Hear Res, 138, 65-72.
10. Long, G.R. & Tubis, A. 1988. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 36, 125-139
11. Mills, D.M., Norton, S.J. & Rubel, E.W. 1993. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2108-2122
12. Mills, D.M. & Rubel, E.W. 1994. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection. Hear Res, 77, 183-199
13. Mills, D.M. & Rubel, E.W. 1996. Development of the cochlear amplifier. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 428-441
14. Mills, D.M. 2003. Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 914-924
15. Mills, D.M. 2004. Relationship of neural and otoacoustic emission thresholds during endocochlear potential development in the gerbil. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 1035-1043
16. Minowa, O., Ikeda, K., Sugitani, Y., Oshima, T., Nakai, S., et al. 1999. Altered cochlear fibrocytes in a mouse model of DFN3 nonsyndromic deafness. Science, 285, 1408-1411
17. Noguchi, Y., Kurima, K., Makishima, T., de Angelis, M.H., Fuchs, H., et al. 2006. Multiple quantitative trait loci modify cochlear hair cell degeneration in the Beethoven (Tmc1Bth) mouse model of progressive hearing loss DFNA36. Genetics, 173, 2111-2119
18. Norton, S.J., Bargones, J.Y. & Rubel, E.W. 1991. Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: Evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code. Hear Res, 51, 73-91.
19. Parham, K. 1997. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the C57BL/6J mouse model of age-related hearing loss. Hear Res, 112, 216-234
20. Parham, K., Sun, X-M. & Kim, D.O. 2001. Noninvasive assessment of auditory function in mice: Auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. In J.F. Willott (ed.), Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research from Behavior to Molecular Biology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 37-58.
21. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1991. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 2027-2067
22. Rubsamen, R. & Lippe, W.R. 1998. The development of cochlear function. In E.W. Rubel, A.N. Popper & R.R. Fay (eds.) Developelopment of the Auditory System. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 193-270.
23. Saunders, J.C. & Garfinkle, T. 1983. Peripheral physiology II. In J.F. Willott (ed.), Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 13-69.
24. Saunders, J.C. & Crumling, M.A. 2001. The outer and middle ear. In J.F. Willott (ed.), Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research from Behaviour to Molecular Biology. London: CRC Press, pp. 99-115.
25. Shnerson, A. & Pujol, R. 1981. Age related changes in the C57BL/6J mouse cochlea. I. Physiological findings. Brain Res, 254, 65-75. (Pubitemid 11016557)
26. Varghese, G.I., Zhu, X. & Frisina, R.D. 2005. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice. Hear Res, 209, 60-67
27. Zhu, X., Vasilyeva, O.N., Kim, S., Jacobson, M., Romney, J., et al. 2007. Auditory efferent feedback system deficits precede age-related hearing loss: Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in mice. J Comp Neurol, 503, 593-604.