Mapping grounded object properties across perceptually heterogeneous embodiments

Proceedings of the 22nd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-22

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 57-62

  Kira, Zsolt ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL SPACES; CONFUSION MATRICES; GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODEL; GROUNDED OBJECTS; HETEROGENEOUS ROBOTS; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; METRIC SPACES; OBJECT PROPERTY; PERCEPTUAL FEATURE; SENSORS AND ACTUATORS; SHARE KNOWLEDGE; SHARED CONTEXT; SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; WEB CAMERA;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SENSORS; SET THEORY; TOPOLOGY;

ROBOTS;

EID: 70350451435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Aisbett, J. & Gibbon, G. (2001), 'A general formulation of conceptual spaces as a meso level representation', Artificial Intelligence 133(1-2), 189-232.
2. Balkenius, C.; Gärdenfors, P. & Hall, L. (2000),'The Origin of Symbols in the Brain', Technical report, Lund University Cognitive Science.
3. Billard, A. & Dautenhahn, K. (1998), 'Grounding communication in autonomous robots: an experimental study', Robotics and Autonomous Systems 1-2, 71-81.
4. Bilmes, J. (1998), 'A Gentle Tutorial of the EM Algorithm and its Application to Parameter Estimation for Gaussian Mixture and Hidden Markov Models', International Computer Science Institute 4.
5. Fowlkes, E. & Mallows, C. (1983), 'A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings, Journal of the American Statistical Association 78(383), 553-569.
6. Kira, Z., Long, K., "Modeling Robot Differences by Leveraging a Physically Shared Context", in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 53-59, 2007. Sweden: Lund University Cognitive Studies.
7. Gärdenfors, P. (2000), Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, MIT Press.
8. Harnad, 5. (1990), 'The Symbol Grounding Problem', Physica D 42, 335-346.
9. Jung, D. & Zelinsky, A. (2000), 'Grounded Symbolic Communication between Heterogeneous Cooperating Robots', Auton. Robots 8(3), 269-292.
10. Kirby, S. (2002), 'Natural Language From Artificial Life', Artificial Life 8(2), 185-2l5.
11. LeBlanc, K. & Saffiotti, A. (2007),Issues of Perceptual Anchoring in Ubiquitous Robotic Systems, in 'Proc. of the ICRA-07 Workshop on Omniscient Space'.
12. Rickard, J. (2006), 'A concept geometry for conceptual spaces', Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 5(4), 311-329.
13. Steels, L. & Kaplan, F. (1999), 'Bootstrapping Grounded Word Semantics', in Briscoe, T., editor, Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: formal and computational models, pages 53-74, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
14. Vogt, P. & Divina, F. (2007), 'Social symbol grounding and language evolution', Interaction Studies 8(1).