Assessing forests and lands with carbon storage and sequestration amount by trees in the State of Delaware, USA

Scientific Research and Essays

Volumn 4, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1100-1108

  Kaya, Latif Gürkan ^a  

^a BARTIN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Delaware; Developed lands; Forest; Impervious cover; Tree cover

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350423261     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19922248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. st Century. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-460 p. 540.
2. Homer C, Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B (2002) Development of a circa 2000 land cover database for the United States. 2002 ASPRS-ACSM Annual Conference and FIG XXII Congress, Washington, D.C., The American Society for Photogrammetric & Remote Sensing, CD ROM, 1 disk.
3. Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B, Homer C (2001). A strategy for estimating tree canopy density using Landsat 7 ETM+ and high resolution images over large areas. Third International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry. Denver, CO. CD-ROM. http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/canopy_density.pdf.
4. th Annual New York State GIS Conference. Albany, New York. (unpublished)
5. Nowak D, Walton J, Dwyer JF, Kaya LG, Myeong S (2005). The Increasing Influence of Urban Environments on U.S. Forest Management. J. For. pp. 377-382.
6. Nowak DJ (1994). Urban forest structure: the state of Chicago's urban forest. In: McPherson, E.G, D.J. Nowak and R.A. Rowntree. Chicago's Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186. pp. 3-18, 140-164.
7. Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the United States. Environ. Poll. 116(3): 381-389.
8. Nowak DJ, Civerolo KL, Rao ST, Sistla G, Luley CJ, Crane DE (2000). A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmos. Environ. 34: 1601-1613.
9. st Century. Proc. of the IUFRO Conference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-212. North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. pp. 714-720.
10. st century. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-287 pp. 9-14.
11. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Ibarra M (2002). Brooklyn's Urban Forest. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. 290. p. 107.
12. Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ (2008). Urban and community forests of New England: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-38. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station p. 62.
13. Nowak DJ, Grennfield EJ, Walton JT (2007a). Delaware's Urban and Community Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-XXX. Draft version for Internal Review 03.26.2007. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. p. XX.
14. Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Walton JT (2006a). Assessing urban forest effects and values: Casper, WY's urban forest. Res. Bull. NRS-4. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station p. 20.
15. Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Walton JT (2006b). Assessing urban forest effects and values: Minneapolis' urban forest. Res. Bull. NE-166. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station p. 20.
16. Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Walton JT (2006c). Assessing urban forest effects and values: Washington D.C.'s urban forest. Resour. Bull. NRS-1. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station p. 24.
17. Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Walton JT (2007b). Assessing urban forest effects and values: New York's urban forest. Resour. Bull. NRS-9. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station p. 22.
18. Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Walton JT (2007c). Assessing urban forest effects and values: Philadelphia's urban forest. Resour. Bull. NRS-7. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station p. 22.
19. Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Walton JT (2007d). Assessing urban forest effects and values: San Francisco's urban forest. Resour. Bull. NRS-8. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station p. 22.
20. Nowak DJ, McHale PJ, Ibarra M, Crane DE, Stevens J, Luley C (1998). Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution. In: Gryning, S.E. and N. Chaumerliac (eds.) Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XII. Plenum Press, New York pp. 399-407.
21. st century. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-287 pp. 6-8.
22. US Census Bureau (2002). n.d. http://www.census.gov
23. US Census Bureau (2003). n.d. http://www.census.gov.
24. USGS (2003). National Land Cover Characterization Project. U.S. Geological Survey, http://landcover.usgs.gov/nationallandcover.html
25. Yang L, Huang C, Homer CG, Wylie BK, Coan MJ (2003). An Approach for Mapping Large-Area Impervious Surfaces: Synergistic Use of Landsat-7 ETM+ and High Spatial Resolution Imagery, Can. J. Remote Sensing 29(2): 230-240.
26. Zhu Z (1994). Forest Density Mapping in the Lower 48 States: A Regression Procedure. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper SO- 280. New Orleans, LA.