Consistent handling of integrity constraints and extensional assertions for schema integration

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1691, Issue , 1999, Pages 31-45

  Türker, Can ^a   Saake, Gunter ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

DATABASE INTEGRATION; INTEGRITY CONSTRAINTS; SCHEMA INTEGRATION;

INTEGRATION;

EID: 70350406659     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48252-0_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. R. M. Alzahrani, M. A. Qutaishat, N. J. Fiddian, and W. A. Gray. Integrity Merging in an Object-Oriented Federated Database Environment. In C. Goble and J. Keane, eds., Proc. BNCOD-13, LNCS 940, pp. 226-248. Springer, 1995.
2. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S. B. Navathe. A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4):323-364, 1986.
3. S. Conrad, I. bcnmitt, and C. Tiirker. Considering Integrity Constraints During Federated Database Design. In S. M. Embury, N. J. Fiddian, A. W. Gray, and A. C. Jones, eds., Proc. BNCOD-16, LNCS 1405, pp. 119-133. Springer, 1998.
4. M. Garcia-Solaco, M. Castellanos, and F. Saltor. A Semantic-Discriminated Approach to Integration in Federated Databases. In S. Laufmann, S. Spaccapietra, and T. Yokoi, eds., Proc. CoopIS795, pp. 19-31, 1995.
5. M. Garcia-Solaco, F. Saltor, and M. Castellanos. Semantic Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems. In O. A. Bukhres and A. K. Elmagarmid, eds., Object-Oriented Multidatabase Systems, pp. 129-202, Prentice Hall, 1996.
6. R. Hull. Relative Information Capacity of Simple Relational Database Schemata. SIAM Journal on Computing, 15(3):856-886, 1986.
7. J. A. Larson, S. B. Navathe, and R. Elmasri. A Theory of Attribute Equivalence in Databases with Application to Schema Integration. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(4):449-463, 1989.
8. M. V. Mannino, B. N. Navathe, and W. Effelsberg. A Rule-based Approach for Merging Generalization Hierarchies. Information Systems, 13(3):257-272, 1988.
9. A. Motro. Superviews: Virtual Integration of Multiple Databases. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(7): 785-798, 1987.
10. S. B. Navathe, R. Elmasri, and J. A. Larson. Integrating User Views in Database Design. IEEE Computer, 19(1):50-62, 1986.
11. M. P. Reddy, B. E. Prasad, and A. Gupta. Formulating Global Integrity Constraints during Derivation of Global Schema. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 16(3):241-268, 1995.
12. I. Schmitt and G. Saake. Merging Inheritance Hierarchies for Database Integration. In M. Halper, ed., Proc. CoopIS798, pp. 322-331. IEEE CS Press, 1998.
13. A. P. Sheth and J. A. Larson. Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3):183-236, 1990.
14. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent, and Y. Dupont. Model Independent Assertions for Internration of Heterogeneous Schemas. The VLDB Journal, 1(1):81-126, 1992.
15. C. Tiirker and G. Saake. Deriving Relationships between Integrity Constraints for Schema Comparison. In W. Litwin, T. Morzy, and G. Vossen, eds., Proc. ADBIS798, LNCS 1475, pp. 188-199. Springer, 1998.
16. M. W. W. Vermeer and P. M. G. Apers. The Role of Tnt.egrity Const,ra.ints in Database Interoperation. In T. M. Vijayaraman, A. P. Buchmann, C. Mohan, and N. L. Sarda, eds., Proc. VLDB'96, pp. 425-435. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.