Unnatural random mating policies select for younger age at maturity in hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1505-1521

  Hankin, David G ^a   Fitzgibbons, Jacqueline ^a   Chen, Yaming ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE AT MATURITY; AGE STRUCTURE; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; HATCHERY; MATURATION; SALMONID; SPAWNING;

CARANGIDAE; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 70350405570     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F09-085     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, E.C., and Garza, J.C. 2006. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference. Genetics, 172(4): 2567-2582. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048074. PMID:16387880.
2. Araki, H., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science (Washington, D.C.), 318(5847): 100-103. doi:10. 1126/science.1145621. PMID:17916734.
3. Baxter, R.D. 1991. Chinook salmon spawning behavior: evidence for size-dependent male spawning success and female mate choice. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Natural Resources Graduate Program, Humboldt State University, Arcata, Calif.
4. Berejikian, B.A., and Tezak, E.P. 2001. Reproductive behavior and breeding success of captively reared Chinook salmon. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21(1): 255-260.
5. Berejikian, B.A., Tezak, E.P., and LaRae, A.L. 2000. Female mate choice and spawning behavior of Chinook salmon under experimental conditions. J. Fish Biol. 57(3): 647-661. doi:10.1111/j. 1095-8649.2000.tb00266.x.
6. Campton, D.E. 2004. Sperm competition in salmon hatcheries: the need to institutionalize genetically benign spawning protocols. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133(5): 1277-1289. doi:10.1577/T03-200.1.
7. Carmichael, R.W., Parker, S.J., and Whitesel, T.A. 1998. Status review of the chinook salmon hatchery program in the Imnaha River Basin, Oregon. In Lower Snake River compensation plan status review symposium. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Boise, Idaho. pp. 119-139.
8. Carroll, J.E., Lauck, T., and Lamberson, R.H. 2005. A Perron Theorem for positive componentwise bilinear maps. Linear Algebra Appl. 396: 259-272. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2004.09.021.
9. Chen, Y. 2007. Long-term effects of alternative hatchery matings practices and size-selective fishing on age and sex composition of Chinook salmon populations returning to hatcheries. M.S. thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, Calif.
10. Falconer, D.S., and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Essex, UK.
11. Fitzgibbons, J. 2004. Effects of hatchery mating practices and ocean fisheries on the age and sex structure of hatchery popula-tions of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). M.S. thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, Calif.
12. Flagg, T.A., Mahnken, C.V.W., and Iwamoto, R.N. 2004. Conservation hatchery protocols for Pacific salmon. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 44: 603-619.
13. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (Coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): Measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution, 48(3): 637-665. doi:10.2307/2410475.
14. Fleming, I.A., and Reynolds, J.D. 2004. Salmonid breeding systems. In Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Edited by A. Hendry and S. Stearns. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 264-294.
15. Gross, M.R. 1991. Salmon breeding behavior and life history evolution in changing environments. Ecology, 72(4): 1180-1186.doi:10.2307/1941091.
16. Hankin, D.G. 1990. Effects of month of release of hatchery-reared Chinook salmon on size at age, maturation schedule, and fishery contribution. Information Report No. 90-4, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, Oregon.
17. Hankin, D.G., and Healey, M.C. 1986. Dependence of exploitation rates for maximum yield and stock collapse on age and sex structure of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) stocks. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 1746-1759. doi:10.1139/f86-219.
18. Hankin, D.G., Nicholas, J.W., and Downey, T.W. 1993. Evidence for inheritance of age of maturity in chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50(2): 347-358. doi:10.1139/f93-040.
19. Hankin, D.G., Nicholas, J.W., and Downey, T.W. 1993. Evidence for inheritance of age of maturity in chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50(2): 347-358. doi:10.1139/f93-040.
20. Hard, J.J. 1995. Genetic monitoring of life history characters in salmon supplementation: problems and opportunities. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 15: 212-225.
21. Hard, J.J. 2004. Evolution of chinook salmon life history under size-selective harvest. In Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Edited by A. Hendry and S. Stearns. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 315-337.
22. Hard, J.J., Gross, M.R., Heino, M., Hilborn, R., Kope, R.G., Law, R., and Reynolds, J.D. 2008. Evolutionary consequences of fishing and their implications for salmon. Evol. Appl. 1(2): 388-408. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00020.x.
23. Hatchery Scientific Review Group. 2004. Mobrand, L., Barr, J., Blankenship, L., Campton, D., Evelyn, T., Flagg, T., Mahnken, C., Piper, R., Seidel, P., Seeb, L., and Smoker, B. 2004. Hatchery reform: principles and recommendations of the HSRG. Long Live the Kings, Seattle, Wash.
24. Healey, M.C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In Pacific salmon life histories. Edited by C. Groot and L. Margolis. UBC Press, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 311-394.
25. Knudsen, C.M., Schroder, S.L., Busack, C.A., Johnston, M.V., Pearsons, T.N., Bosch, W.J., and Fast, D.E. 2006. Comparison of life history traits between first-generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135(4): 1130-1144. doi:10.1577/T05-121.1.
26. McLean, J.E., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T.P. 2005. Nonrandom, sizeand timing-biased breeding in a hatchery population of steelhead trout. Conserv. Biol. 19(2): 446-454. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739. 2005.00515.x.
27. Nicholas, J.W., and Hankin, D.G. 1988. Chinook salmon populations in Oregon coastal river basins: description of life histories and assessment of recent trends in run strengths. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Information Report No. 88-1.
28. Ricker, W.E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11: 559-623.
29. Ricker, W.E. 1972. Hereditary and environmental factors affecting certain salmonid populations. In The stock concept in Pacific salmon. Edited by R.C. Simon and P. Larkin. Mitchell Press Limited, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 19-160.
30. Ricker, W.E. 1976. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin No. 191, Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Ottawa.
31. Ricker, W.E. 1980. Causes of the decrease in age and size of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. Tech. Rep.
32. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 944.
33. Rutter, C. 1904. Natural history of the quinnat salmon. A report of investigations in the Sacramento River, 1986-1901. Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. 1902: 65-141.
34. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Columbia River Basin Hatchery Review Team: principles. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region Federal Hatchery Review, Portland, Oregon.
35. Waples, R.S. 1991. Genetic interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids: lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48(Suppl. 1): 124-133. doi:10.1139/f91-311.
36. Wells, B.K., Grimes, C.B., and Waldvogel, J.B. 2007. Quantifying the effects of wind, upwelling, curl, sea surface temperature and sea level height on growth and maturation of a California Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations. Fish. Oceanogr. 16(4): 363-382. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2007.00437.x.