Statistical models of F2 slope in relation to severity of dysarthria

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 329-335

  Kim, Yunjung ^a   Weismer, Gary ^b   Kent, Raymond D ^b   Duffy, Joseph R ^c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic analysis; Dysarthria; Speech intelligibility

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DYSARTHRIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARKINSON DISEASE; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; TIME;

AGED; DYSARTHRIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PARKINSON DISEASE; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; STROKE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70350401898     PISSN: 10217762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000252849     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ansel BM, Kent RD: Acoustic-phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 296-308.
2. Liu HM, Tsao FM, Kuhl PK: The effect of reduced vowel working space on speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 3879-3889.
3. Weismer G, Martin RE: Acoustic and perceptual approaches to the study of intelligibility; in Kent RD (ed): Intelligibility in Speech Disorders: Theory, Measurement, and Management. Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1992, pp 67-118.
4. Whitehill TL, Ciocca V: Speech errors in Cantonese speaking adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Linguist Phon 2000; 14: 111-130.
5. Weismer G: Assessment of articulatory timing; in Cooper J (ed): Assessment of Speech and Voice Production: Research and Clinical Applications. NIDCD Monogr. Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, 1991, vol 1, pp 84-95.
6. Weismer G, Jeng J, Laures R, Kent RD, Kent JF: Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2001; 53: 1-18.
7. Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Martin RE, Sufit RL, Rosenbek JC, Brooks BR: Relationships between speech intelligibility and the slope of second-formant transitions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Linguist Phon 1989; 3: 347-358.
8. Kent JF, Kent RD, Rosenbek JC, Weismer G, Martin RE, Sufit RL, Brooks BR: Qualitative description of the dysarthria in women with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 723-733.
9. Weismer G, Martin R, Kent RD, Kent JF: Formant trajectory characteristics of males with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1085-1098.
10. Rosen KM, Goozée JV, Murdoch BE: Examining the effects of multiple sclerosis on speech production: does phonetic structure matter? J Commun Disord 2008; 41: 49-69.
11. Tjaden K, Wilding GE: Rate and loudness manipulations in dysarthria: acoustic and perceptual findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47: 766-783.
12. Weismer G, Wildermuth J: Formant trajectory characteristics in persons with Parkinson, cerebellar, and upper motor neuron disease. 135th Meet Acoust Soc Am, Seattle, 1998.
13. Stevens KN: Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2000.
14. Weismer G: Motor speech disorders; in Hardcastle WJ, Laver J (eds): The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge, Blackwell, 1997, pp 191-219.
15. Ziegler W: Speech motor control is task-specific: evidence from dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 3-36.
16. Weismer G: Philosophy of research in motor speech disorders. Clin Linguist Phon 2006; 20: 315-349.
17. Weismer G, Kent RD, Hodge M, Martin R: The acoustic signature of intelligibility test words. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 1281-1291.
18. Milenkovic P: TF 32 [computer program]. University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2001.
19. Gescheider GA: Psychophysics, Method and Theory. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1976.
20. Engen T: Psychophysics. II. Scaling methods; in Kling JW, Riggs L (eds): Woodworth and Schlossberg's Experimental Psychology. New York, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971, pp 47-86.
21. Duffy J: Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management, ed 2. St Louis, Mosby, 2005.
22. Weismer G, Berry J: Effects of speaking rate on second formant trajectories of selected vocalic nuclei. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 3362-3378.
23. Monsen RB: The oral speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired talkers. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48: 286-296.
24. Weismer G: Speech intelligibility; in Ball MJ, Perkins M, Müller N, Howard S (eds): The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics. Oxford, Blackwell, 2008, pp 568-582.
25. Ballard KJ, Robin DA, Folkins JW: An integrative model of speech motor control: a response to Ziegler. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 37-48.
26. Robin DA, Solomon NP, Moon JB, Folkins JW: Nonspeech assessment of the speech production mechanism; in McNeil MR (ed): Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders. New York, Thieme, 1997, pp 49-62.
27. Weismer G, Kim YJ: Classification and taxonomy of motor speech disorders: what are the issues?; in Maassen B, Van Lieshout, PHHM (eds): Speech Motor Control: New Developments and Applied Research. Oxford, Oxford University Press, in press.
28. Goberman AM: Correlation between acoustic speech characteristics and non-speech motor performance in Parkinson disease. Med Sci Monit 2005; 11:CR109-CR116.