Boot camp prisons for women offenders

Correctional Boot Camps: Military Basic Training or a Model for Corrections?

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 247-262

  MacKenzie, Doris Layton ^a   Donaldson, Heidi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350397118     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483328874.n17     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. American Correctional Association. (1990). The female offender: What does the future hold?Washington, D.C.: St. Mary's Press.
2. American Correctional Association. (1993). Female offenders: Meeting needs of a neglected population. Laurel, MD: Author.
3. Baunach, P. J. (1985). Mothers in prison. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4. Bershad, L. (1985). Discriminatory treatment of the female offender in the criminal justice system. Boston College Law Review, 26, 389-438.
5. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1994). Survey of state prison inmates 1991: Women in prison. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
6. Chesney-Lind, M., & Pollock-Byrne, J. (1993). Women's prisons. Equality with a vengeance. Unpublished manuscript. University of Hawaii at Manoa.
7. Cronin, R. C. (1994). Boot camps for adult and juvenile offenders: Overview and update. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
8. Glick, R. M., & Neto, V. (1982). National study of women's correctional programs. In B. R.Price & N. J.Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women (pp. 141-154). New York: Clark Boardman Company.
9. MacKenzie, D. L. (1993). Boot camp prisons 1993. National Institute of Justice Journal, 217, 21-28.
10. MacKenzie, D. L., & Piquero, A. (1994). The impact of shock incarceration programs on prison crowding. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 222-249. doi:10.1177/0011128794040002005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128794040002005
11. MacKenzie, D. L., & Shaw, J. (1990). Inmate adjustment and change during shock incarceration: The impact of correctional boot camp programs. Justice Quarterly, 7, 125-150. doi:10.1080/07418829000090501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418829000090501
12. MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. (1992). Inmate attitude change during incarceration: A comparison of boot camp and traditional prison. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
13. MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. (1993). Multi-site study of shock incarceration: Process evaluation. Unpublished final report to the National Institute of Justice. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
14. MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. (1994). Multi-site evaluation of shock incarceration: Executive summary. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
15. Morash, M., & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the idea of boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 204-222. doi:10.1177/0011128790036002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128790036002002
16. Morris, A. (1987). Women, crime and criminal justice. London: Basil Blackwell.
17. New York Department of Correctional Services. (1992). Report to the Legislature on shock incarceration in New York. Unpublished report.
18. Parent, D. (1989). Shock incarceration: An overview of existing programs. NIJ Issues and Practices. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
19. Pollock-Byrne, J. (1990). Women, prison and crime. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
20. Rafter, N. H. (1989). Gender and justice: The equal protection issue. In L.Goodstein & D. L.MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison: Issues in research and policy (pp. 89-109). New York: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5652-3_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5652-3_6
21. Rafter, N. H. (1990). Partial justice: Women, prisons and social control. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
22. Robinson, R. (1992). Intermediate sanctions and the female offender. In J.Byrne, A.Lurigio, & J.Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing. The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 245-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Ruback, B. (1980). The sexually integrated prison: A legal and policy evaluation. In J. O.Smykla (Ed.), Coed prison (pp. 33-60). New York: Human Sciences Press.
24. Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203206164 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203206164
25. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75. doi:10.2307/351733 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351733
26. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1993). Prison boot camps: Short-term costs reduced, but long-term impact uncertain. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Van Ochten, M. (1993). Legal issues and the female offender. In Female offenders: Meeting needs of a neglected population (pp. 31-36). Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
28. Weisheit, R. (1985). Trends in programs for female offenders: The use of private agencies as service providers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 29, 35-42. doi:10.1177/0306624X8502900104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X8502900104