Reduced-order modeling of parameterized PDEs using time-space-parameter principal component analysis

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1025-1057

  Audouze, C ^a   de Vuyst, F ^a,b   Nair, P B ^c  

^a ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design optimization; Fluid dynamics problems; Metamodel; Parameterized partial differential equation (PDE); Physics based model; Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD); Radial basis functions (RBF); Reduced order model (ROM); Surrogate

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; METAMODEL; PARAMETERIZED PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION (PDE); PHYSICS-BASED MODEL; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION (POD); RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS (RBF); REDUCED-ORDER MODEL (ROM); SURROGATE;

AIRCRAFT ENGINES; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID DYNAMICS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

EID: 70350393816     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2540     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer: New York, 2003.
2. Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2003
3. Karhumen K. Uber lineare methoden in der wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Annales Academiaé Scientiarum Fennicaé, Series A-1 (Mathematica-Physica) 1946; 37
4. Loève MM. Probability theory. The University Series in Higher Mathematics (3rd edn). Van Nostrand: Princeton, NJ, 1963
5. Breitkopf P, Naceur H, Vayssade C. Intermediate response surface modeling for MDO problems, Proceedings of International Conference on Computational and Experimental Engineering and Sciences, ICCES'05 Chennai, India, 2005
6. Keane AJ, Nair PB. Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design. Wiley: New York, 2005
7. Lumley JL. The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flow. In Atmospheric Turbulence and Wave Propagation, Yaglom AM, Tatarski VI (eds). Nauka: Moscow, 1967; 166-178
8. Volkwein S. Model Reduction Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, script, 2006. Available at: www.unigraz.at/imawww/volkwein/POD.pdf
9. Sirovich L. Dynamics and the coherence of turbulent structures, Parts I-III. Quaterly of Applied Mathematics 1987; XLV(3):561-590
10. Ravindran SS. A reduced order approach to optimal control of fluids using proper orthogonal decomposition. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2000; 34:425-448
11. LeGresley PA. Application of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) to design decomposition methods. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, October 2005
12. LeGresley PA, Alonso JJ. Airfoil design optimization using ROM based on POD. AIAA Paper 2000-2545, 2000
13. LeGresley PA, Alonso JJ. Dynamic domain decomposition and error correction for reduced order models. AIAA Paper 2003-0250, 2003
14. Iollo A, Lanteri S, Désidéri J-A. Stability properties of POD-Galerkin approximations for the compressible Navier- Stokes equations. Research Report INRIA 3589, 1998
15. Dulong JL, Druesne F, Villon P. A model reduction approach for real-time part deformation with nonlinear mechanical behavior. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 2007; 1:229-238
16. Maday Y, Patera AT, Turinici G. A priori convergence theory for reduced-basis approximations of single-parameter elliptic partial differential equations. Journal of Scientific Computing 2002; 17:437-446
17. Prud'homme C, Rovas D, Veroy K, Maday Y, Patera AT, Turinici G. Reliable real-time solution of parameterized partial differential equations: reduced-basis output bounds. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2002; 124:70-80
18. Veroy K, Patera AT. Certified real-time solution of the parameterized steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: rigorous reduced-basis a posteriori error bounds. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 47:773-788
19. Ryckelynck D. A priori hyperreduction method: an adaptive approach. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 202(1):346-366
20. Ryckelynck D, Chinesta F, Cueto E, Ammar A. On the a priori model reduction: overview and recent developments. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2006; 13(1):91-128
21. Nair PB. Physics-based surrogate modeling of parameterized PDEs for optimization and uncertainty analysis. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics, and Materials Con- ference, Denver, CO, 2002; AIAA Paper 2002-1586
22. Sobol IM. On the systematic search in a hypercube. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1979; 16(5):790-793
23. Fox B. Algorithm 647: implementation and relative efficiency of quasirandom sequence generators. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 1986; 12:362-376
24. Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1993; 25:539-575
25. Holmes P, Lumley J, Berkooz G. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1996
26. Bui-Thanh T, Willcox K, Ghattas O. Model reduction for large-scale systems with high-dimensional parametric input space. MIT ACDL, ACDL-TR-07-2, August 2007; SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2008; 30(6):3270-3288
27. Nair PB, Choudhury A, Keane AJ. Some greedy learning algorithms for sparse regression and classification with mercer kernels. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2002; 3:781-801
28. Anderson E, Bai Z, Bischof C, Demmel J, Dongarra J, Du Croz J, Greenbaum A, Hammarling S, McKenney A, Ostrouchov S, Sorensen D. LAPACK Users Guide. SIAM: Philadelphia, 1992
29. Lehoucq RB, Sorensen DC, Yang C. ARPACK Users' Guide: Solution of Large-scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods. SIAM: Philadelphia, 1998
30. Audouze C. Daïm F, De Vuyst F, Laurent P. Space-time proper orthogonal decompositions and radial basis functions for metamodeling of time-dependent fluid flow design analysis. Research Report ECP/MAS RR0703, 2007
31. Farhat C, Chandesris M. Time-decomposed parallel time-integrators: theory and feasability studies for fluid, structure, and fluid-structure applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 58(9):1397-1434
32. Aubry N, Guyonnet R, Lima R. Spatio-temporal analysis of complex signals: theory and applications. Journal of Statistical Physics 1991; 63:683
33. OMD, French Industrial and Academic OMD Consortium (Multidisciplinary Optimization), Réseau National des Technologies Logicielles, 2005. http://omd/lri/fr/
34. Lions JL, Maday Y, Turinici G. Résolution d'EDP par un schéma en temps pararéel. [A 'parareal' in time discretization of PDE's.] Comptes Rendus de l' Académie des Sciences, Série I. Mathématique 2001; 332(7): 661-668
35. De Vuyst F, Audouze C. Physics-based metamodeling for parametrized PDE problems using space-parameter space principal component analysis. Model Reduction: Theory and Applications. Lecture Notes. CEA-EDF-INRIA School: INRIA Rocquencourt, France, 8-10 October 2007
36. Audouze C, De Vuyst F. State of the art in physics-based metamodeling for CFD problems. Research Report ECP/MAS 2007; Journal of Shanghai University 2007; in press
37. Audouze C, Daim F, De Vuyst F, Laurent P, Muni-Toke I. The parareal algorithm as time domain decomposition method. In Applications in Finance and Biology, Chapter in Domain Decomposition Methods: Algorithms and Practice', Magoulès F (ed.). Saxe Coburg Publications: U.K., 2008; in press
38. Bleris L, Kothare MV. Low-order empirical modeling of distributed parameter systems using temporal and spatial eigenfunctions. Computer and Chemical Engineering 2005; 29:817-827
39. Gander MJ, Vandewalle S. Analysis of the parareal time-parallel time-integration method. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2007; 29(2):556-578