A game-theoretic analysis of updating sets of probabilities

Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 240-247

  Grünwald, Peter D ^a   Halpern, Joseph Y ^b  

^a CWI   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MINIMAX CRITERION; OPTIMAL DECISION-RULE; SETS OF PROBABILITIES; TIME INCONSISTENCY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GAME THEORY; RANDOM VARIABLES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 70350379554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Augustin, T. (2003). On the suboptimality of the generalized Bayes rule and robust Bayesian procedures from the decision theoretic point of view. In Proceedings ISIPTA '03, pp. 31-45.
2. Cozman, F. G. and P. Walley (2001). Graphoid properties of epistemic irrelevance and independence. In Proceedings ISIPTA '01, pp. 112-121.
3. Dawid, A. (1982). The well-calibrated Bayesian. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77.
4. Gärdenfors, P. and N. Sahlin (1982). Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making. Synthese 53, 361-386.
5. Gilboa, I. and D. Schmeidler (1989). Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141-153.
6. Grove, A. J. and J. Y. Halpern (1998). Updating sets of probabilities. In Proceedings UAI '98, pp. 173-182.
7. Grünwald, P. and A. Dawid (2004). Game theory, maximum entropy, minimum discrepancy, and robust Bayesian decision theory. The Annals of Statistics 32(4), 1367-1433. (Pubitemid 41250271)
8. Grünwald, P. and J. Halpern (2004). When ignorance is bliss. In Proceedings UAI '04, pp. 226-1.734.
9. Grünwald, P. and J. Halpern (2007). A gametheoretic analysis of updating sets of probabilities. http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3235.
10. Herron, T., T. Seidenfeld, and L.Wasserman (1997). Divisive conditioning: Further results on dilation. Philosophy of Science 64, 411-444. (Pubitemid 127461679)
11. Hughes, R. I. G. and B. C. van Fraassen (1985). Symmetry arguments in probability kinematics. In P. Kitcher and P. Asquith (Eds.), PSA 1984, Volume 2, pp. 851-869. Philosophy of Science Association.
12. Mosteller, F. (1965). Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions. Addison-Wesley.
13. Seidenfeld, T. (2004). A contrast between two decision rules for use with (convex) sets of probabilities: maximin versus E-admissibility. Synthese.
14. Seidenfeld, T. and L. Wasserman (1993). Dilation for convex sets of probabilities. Annals of Statistics 21, 1139-1154.
15. van Fraassen, B. C. (1987). Symmetries of personal probability kinematics. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Scientific Enquiry in Philsophical Perspective, pp. 183-223. University Press of America.
16. vos Savant, M. (Sept. 9, 1990). Ask Marilyn. Parade Magazine, 15.
17. Vovk, V., A. Gammerman, and G. Shafer (2005). Algorithmic Learning in a Random World. Springer.
18. Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley.
19. Walley, P. (1991). Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall.