Realising the potential of the family history in risk assessment and primary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: ADDFAM study protocol

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Qureshi, Nadeem ^a   Armstrong, Sarah ^a   Saukko, Paula ^b   Sach, Tracey ^c   Middlemass, Jo ^d   Evans, Phil H ^e   Kai, Joe ^a   Farrimond, Hannah ^f   Humphries, Steve E ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^d Nottinghamshire County Teaching Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^e PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^g ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUROPE; FAMILY HISTORY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECORDING; REGISTRATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TAXONOMY; UNITED KINGDOM; ANAMNESIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ECONOMICS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIFESTYLE; METHODOLOGY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

CORONARY DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FOCUS GROUPS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LIFE STYLE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 70350365849     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-184     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. D Wood R Wray N Poulter B Williams M Kirby V Patel P Durrington J Reckless M Davis F Sivers J Potter, Heart 2005 91 1 52 10.1136/hrt.2004.042515 15604317
2. Family history is a coronary heart disease risk factor in the Second Northwick Park Heart Study. E Hawe PJ Talmud GJ Miller SE Humphries, Annals of Human Genetics 2003 67 97 106 10.1046/j.1469-1809.2003.00017.x 12675686
3. Usefulness of cardiovascular family history data for population-based preventive medicine and medical research (the Health Family Tree Study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study). RR Williams SC Hunt G Heiss MA Province JT Bensen M Higgins RM Chamberlain J Ware PN Hopkins, American Journal of Cardiology 2001 87 129 135 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01303-5 11152826
4. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Task Force Report, European Heart Journal 1998 19 1434 1503 10.1053/euhj.1998.1243 9820987
5. Research priorities for evaluating family history in the prevention of common chronic diseases. PW Yoon MT Scheuner MJ Khoury, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2003 24 128 135 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00585-8 12568818
6. Familial Risk for Common Diseases in Primary Care: The Family Healthware(TM) Impact Trial. SM O'Neill WS Rubinstein C Wang PW Yoon LS Acheson N Rothrock EJ Starzyk JL Beaumont JM Galliher MT Ruffin Iv, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2009 36 506 514 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.002 19460658
7. Framingham-based Tools to Calculate the Global Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Tools for Clinicians. S Sheridan M Pignone C Mulrow, Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003 18 1039 1052 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30107.x 14687264
8. Continuous medical education approaches for clinical genetics: a postal survey of general practitioners. N Qureshi R Hapgood S Armstrong, Journal of Medical Genetics 2002 39 69 10.1136/jmg.39.11.e69 12414831
9. New developments in genetics-knowledge, attitudes and information needs of practice nurses. C Bankhead J Emery N Qureshi H Campbell J Austoker E Watson, Family Practice 2001 18 475 486 10.1093/fampra/18.5.475 11604367
10. Exploring the potential of the family history to identify genetic risk in primary care. N Qureshi, University of Nottingham, School of community Health Sciences 2006
11. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: Final results of the OXCHECK study. Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study, British Medical Journal 1995 310 1099 1104 7742676
12. Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomized trial. A Steptoe S Doherty E Rink S Kerry T Kendrick S Hilton, British Medical Journal 1999 319 943 948 10514155
13. The Tromso Survey: the Family Intervention study - the effect of intervention on some coronary risk factors and dietary habits, a 6-year follow-up. SF Knutsen R Knutsen, Preventive Medicine 1991 20 197 212 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90020-5 2057468
14. Are perceptions of a family history of heart disease related to health-related attitudes and behaviour? K Hunt C Davison C Emslie G Ford, Health Education Research 2000 15 131 143 10.1093/her/15.2.131 10751372
15. Will genetic testing for predisposition for disease result in fatalism? A qualitative study of parents responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia. V Senior TM Marteau TJ Peters, Social Science & Medicine 1999 48 1857 1860 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00099-4 (Pubitemid 29268031)
16. Genetic Risk Assessment for the FH Trial Study Group. Psychological impact of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia within a previously aware population: a randomized controlled trial. T Marteau V Senior SE Humphries M Bobrow T Cranston MA Crook L Day M Fernandez R Horne A Ivensen, et al. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2004 128A 285 293 10.1002/ajmg.a.30102 15216550
17. Lay constructions of a family history of heart disease: potential for misunderstandings in the clinical encounter? K Hunt C Emslie G Watt, Lancet 2001 357 1168 1171 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04334-8 11323044
18. Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. FM Walter J Emery D Braithwaite TM Marteau, Annals of Family Medicine 2004 2 583 594 15576545 10.1370/afm.242 (Pubitemid 39643434)
19. 'Coming down the line' - Patients' understanding of their family history of common chronic disease. FM Walter J Emery, Annals of Family Medicine 2005 3 405 414 16189056 10.1370/afm.368 (Pubitemid 41512657)
20. The health consequences of cultural consonance: Cultural dimensions of lifestyle, social support, and arterial blood pressure in an African American community. WW Dressler JR Bindon, American Anthropologist 2000 102 244 260 10.1525/aa.2000.102.2.244
21. A randomized controlled trial to assess the psychological impact of a family history screening questionnaire in general practice. N Qureshi PJ Standen R Hapgood J Hayes, Family Practice 2001 18 78 83 10.1093/fampra/18.1.78 11145633
22. Collecting genetic information in primary care: evaluating a new family history tool. N Qureshi J Bethea B Modell P Brennan A Papageorgiou S Raeburn R Hapgood M Modell N Qureshi J Bethea, et al. Family Practice 2005 22 663 669 10.1093/fampra/cmi073 16055464
23. Assessing family history of heart disease in primary care consultations: a qualitative study. R Hall PM Saukko PH Evans N Qureshi SE Humphries R Hall PM Saukko PH Evans N Qureshi SE Humphries, Family Practice 2007 24 435 442 10.1093/fampra/cmm037 17728290
24. Population implications of lipid lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: data from the 1995 Scottish health survey. IU Haq LE Ramsay EJ Wallis CG Isles LD Ritchie PR Jackson, Heart 2001 86 289 295 11514481 10.1136/heart.86.3.289
25. Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. J Donovan N Mills M Smith L Brindle A Jacoby T Peters S Frankel D Neal F Hamdy, BMJ 2002 325 766 769 12364308 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766
26. Clinical research in. W Miller B Crabtree, The Sage handbook of qualitative research Thousand Oaks: Sage, Denzin NK,Lincoln YS, 3 2005 605 640
27. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). F Bradley R Wiles AL Kinmonth D Mant M Gantley, British Medical Journal 1999 318 711 715 10074018
28. M Bloor J Frankland M Thomas K Robson, Focus groups in social research Thousand Oaks: Sage 2001
29. The stages of exercise scale and stages of exercise behaviour in female adults. B Cardinal, Journal of Sports and Medicine and Physical Fitness 1995 35 87 92
30. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment. L Roe C Strong C Whiteside A Neil D Mant, Family Practice 1994 11 375 381 10.1093/fampra/11.4.375 7895964
31. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. T Marteau H Bekker, British Journal of Clinical Psycology 1992 31 301 306
32. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). R Moss-Morris J Weinman KJ Petrie R Horne LD Cameron D Buick, Psychology and Health 2002 17 1 16 10.1080/08870440290001494
33. Causal attributions in patients and spouses following first time myocardial infarction and subsequent lifestyle change. J Weinman K Petrie N Sharpe S Walker, British Journal of Health Psychology 2000 5 263 273 10.1348/135910700168900
34. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. SJ Walters J Brazier, Journal of Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003 1 4 10.1186/1477-7525-1-4 (Pubitemid 39111992)
35. The estimation of a preference-based measures of health from the SF-36. J Brazier J Roberts M Deverill, Journal of Health Economics 2002 21 271 292 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8 11939242
36. Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study. TM Marteau M van Duijn I Ellis, Journal of Medical Genetics 1992 29 24 26 1552538 10.1136/jmg.29.1.24
37. The impact of population based screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis. H Bekker G Denniss M Modell M Bobrow T Marteau, Journal of Medical Genetics 1994 31 364 368 8064812 10.1136/jmg.31.5.364 (Pubitemid 24157248)
38. P Saukko, Methodologies for cultural studies: An integrative approach Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: In NK Denzin & YS Lincoln 2005
39. H Glick J Doshi S Sonnad D Polsky, Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials. Handbooks in Health Economic Evaluation Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007
40. Unit costs of health and social care. Personal Social Services Research. http://www.pssru.ac.uk/uc/uc.htm
41. NHS reference costs 2006-07. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-082571
42. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. E Fenwick K Claxton M Sculper, Health Econ 2001 10 779 787 10.1002/hec.635 11747057