Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 181-186

  Saneyoshi, Ayako ^a   Michimata, Chikashi ^b  

^a TEIKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SOPHIA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Between and within category object discrimination; Categorical and coordinate spatial processing; Hemispheric asymmetry; Object recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 70350347443     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 115-147
2. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
3. Cooper E.E., and Wojan T.J. Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26 (2000) 470-488
4. Curby K., Hayward G., and Gauthier I. Laterality effects in the recognition of depth rotated objects. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 4 (2004) 100-111
5. Hellige J.B. Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left (1993), Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2001 paperback
6. Hellige J.B. Hemispheric asymmetry for components of visual information processing. In: Davidson R.J., and Hugdahl K. (Eds). Brain Asymmetry (1995), Cambridge, MIT Press 99-121
7. Hellige J.B., and Michimata C. Categorization versus distance. Hemispheric differences for processing of spatial information. Memory and Cognition 17 (1989) 770-776
8. Jager G., and Postma A. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 504-515
9. Kosslyn S.M. Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 148-175
10. Kosslyn S.M. Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate (1994), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Kosslyn S.M. You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 1519-1523
12. Kosslyn S.M., Koenig O., Barrett A., Cave C.B., Tang J., and Gabrieli J.D.E. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 723-735
13. Laeng B., Carlesimo G.A., Caltagirone C., Capasso R., and Miceli G. Rigid and nonrigid objects in canonical and noncanonical views: Hemispheric effects on object identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology 19 (2002) 697-720
14. Laeng B., Chabris C.F., and Kosslyn S.M. Asymmetries in encoding spatial relations. In: Hugdahl K., and Davidson R. (Eds). The Asymmetrical Brain (2003), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 303-339
15. Laeng B., Zarrinpar A., and Kosslyn S.M. Do separate processes identify objects as exemplars versus members of basic-level categories? Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Brain and Cognition 53 (2003) 15-27
16. Marr D. Vision (1982), W.H. Freeman and Co, New York, NY
17. Marsolek C.J. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 111-118
18. Martin R., Houssemand C., Schiltz C., Burnod Y., and Alexandre F. Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm. Neuropsychologia 46 2 (2008) 576-594
19. Michimata C. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in vision and visual imagery. Brain and Cognition 33 (1997) 370-387
20. Newell F.N., and Bülthoff H.H. Categorical perception of familiar objects. Cognition 85 (2002) 113-143
21. Okubo M., and Michimata C. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 291-297
22. Okubo M., and Michimata C. The role of high spatial frequencies on hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (2004) 1576-1582
23. Pelli D.G. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
24. Saneyoshi A., Kaminaga T., and Michimata C. Hemispheric processing of categorical/metric properties in object recognition. NeuroReport 17 (2006) 517-521