Political parties and governors as determinants of legislative behavior in Brazil's chamber of deputies, 1988-2006

Latin American Politics and Society

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-30

  Cheibub, José Antonio ^a   Figueiredo, Argelina ^a   Limongi, Fernando ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEDERAL SYSTEM; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; NATIONAL POLITICS; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

BRAZIL;

EID: 70350346016     PISSN: 1531426X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00038.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abrucio, Fernando Luiz. 1998. Os barões da federação: os governadores e a redemocratização brasileira. São Paulo: Hucitec.
2. Alston, Lee J., Marcus André Melo, Bernardo Mueller, and Carlos Pereira. 2006. Political Institutions, Policy Making Processes and Policy Outcomes in Brazil. Research Network Working Paper R-509. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, Latin American Research Network.
3. Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Armijo, Leslie Elliot, Philippe Faucher, and Magdalena Dembinska. 2006. Compared to What? Assessing Brazil's Political Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 39, 6: 759-86.
5. Arretche, Marta. 2000. Estado federativo e políticas sociais: determinantes da decentralização. Rio de Janeiro: Revan/Fapesp.
6. Arretche, Marta. 2004. Toward a Unified and More Equitable System: Health Reform in Brazil. In Crucial Needs, Weak Incentives: Social Sector Reform, Democratization, and Globalization in Latin America, ed. Robert R. Kaufman and Joan Nelson. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center/John Hopkins University Press. 155-88.
7. Arretche, Marta, and Jonathan Rodden. 2004. Política distributiva na federação: estratégias eleitorais, barganhas legislativas e coalizões de governo. Dados 47, 3: 549-76.
8. Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2005. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Political Analysis 13: 1-20.
9. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1977. Dos governos militares a Prudente-Campos Sales. In História geral da civilização brasileira, ed. Boris Fausto. São Paulo: DIFEL. 13-50.
10. Carey, John M. 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51, 1: 92-107.
11. Carey, John M., and Gina Yannitell Reinhardt. 2003. Impacto das instituições estaduais na unidade das coalizões parlamentares no Brasil. Dados 46, 4: 773-804.
12. Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP). n.d. Roll-call dataset. www.cebrap.org.br/index.asp Accessed March 3, 2008.
13. Cheibub, José Antonio, Adam Przeworski, and Sebastian Saiegh. 2004. Government Coalition and Legislative Effectiveness Under Parliamentarism and Presidentialism. British Journal of Political Science 34: 568-87.
14. Cheibub, José Antonio, Argelina Figueiredo, and Fernando Limongi. 2002. Presidential Agenda Power and Decision-Making in Presidential Regimes: Governors and Political Parties in the Brazilian Congress. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29-September 1.
15. Desposato, Scott. 2004. The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29: 259-85.
16. Desposato, Scott. 2006. Correcting for Small Group Inflation of Roll-Call Cohesion Scores. British Journal of Political Science 35, 4: 731-44.
17. Eaton, Kent, and J. Tyler Dickovick. 2004. The Politics of Recentralization in Argentina and Brazil. Latin American Research Review 39, 1: 91-122.
18. Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando Limongi. 1999. Executivo e legislativo na nova ordem constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
19. Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in the Legislature. Comparative Politics 32, 2: 151-70.
20. Gomes, Angela Maria de Castro, ed. 1980. Regionalismo e centralizçaõ política: partidos e constituinte nos anos 30. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
21. Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. King, David C., and Richard Zeckhauseer. 2003. Congressional Vote Options. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 387-411.
23. Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. Where's the Party? British Journal of Political Science 23, 2: 235-66.
24. Kugelmas, Eduardo, and Lourdes Sola. 1999. Recentralização/descentralização: dinâmica do regime federativo no Brasil nos anos 90. Tempo Social: Revista de Sociologia da USP 11, 2.
25. Leal, Victor Nunes. 1997. Coronelismo, enxada e voto: o município e o regime representativo no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
26. Levine, Robert M. 1978. Pernambuco in the Brazilian Federation, 1889-1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27. Love, Joseph L. 1971. Rio Grande do Sul and Brazilian Regionalism, 1882-1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28. Love, Joseph L. 1980. São Paulo in the Brazilian Federation, 1889-1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29. Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring and Matthew Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 55-109.
30. Melo, Marcus André. 2005. O sucesso inesperado das reformas de segunda geração: federalismo, reformas constitucionais e políticas sociais. Dados 48, 4: 845-89.
31. Néri, Marcelo. 2005. Miséria em queda: mensuração, monitoramento e metas. Revista Conjuntura Econômica 59, 12: 38-40.
32. Queiroz, Maria Isaura Pereira de. 1969. O mandonismo local na vida política brasileira (da colônià primeira republica). São Paulo: Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, Universidade de São Paulo.
33. Rodden, Jonathan A. 2006. Hamilton's Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Saiegh, Sebastian. 2004. Government Defeat: Coalitions, Responsiveness, and Legislative Performance. Ph.D. diss., New York University.
35. Samuels, David. 2000. Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25, 3 (August): 481-97.
36. Samuels, David, and Scott Mainwaring. 2004. Strong Federalism, Constraints on the Central Government, and Economic Reform in Brazil. In Federalism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Edward L. Gibson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 85-130.
37. Soares, Sergei, Rafael Guerreiro Osório, Fábio Veras Soares, Marcelo Medeiros, and Eduardo Zepeda. 2007. Programas de transferência condicionada de renda no Brasil, Chile e México: impacto sobre a desigualdade. Unpublished mss. Brasília: IPEA.
38. Stepan, Alfred. 1999. Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy 10, 4: 19-34.
39. Stepan, Alfred. 2000. Brazil's Decentralized Federalism: Bringing Government Closer to Citizens? Daedalus 29, 2: 145-70.
40. Stepan, Alfred. 2004. Toward a New Comparative Politics of Federalism, Multinationalism, and Democracy: Beyond Rikerian Federalism. In Federalism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Edward L. Gibson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 29-84.
41. Willis, Eliza, Christopher Garman, and Stephan Haggard. 1999. The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 34, 1: 7-56.
42. Wirth, John D.1977Minas Gerais in the Brazilian Federation, 1889-1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press