Reprioritization of failures in a silane supply system using an intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique

Soft Computing

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 285-298

  Chang, Kuei Hu ^a   Cheng, Ching Hsue ^b   Chang, Yung Chia ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis; Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Risk priority number

Indexed keywords

CRITICALITY ANALYSIS; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS; NEW APPROACHES; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; NUMERICAL VERIFICATION; RANKING TECHNIQUE; RE-PRIORITIZATION; RISK OF FAILURE; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER; RISK RANKING; SIMPLIFIED ALGORITHMS; SUPPLY SYSTEM;

CRITICALITY (NUCLEAR FISSION); FAILURE ANALYSIS; FUZZY SETS; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SILANES;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 70350341882     PISSN: 14327643     EISSN: 14337479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-009-0403-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Atanassov KT (1983) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Central Tech Library, Bulgarian Academy Science, Sofia. Report no. 1697(84)
2. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87-96. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
3. Bowles JB (2003) An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. In: Processing annual reliability and maintainability symposium, pp 380-386
4. Bowles JB, Pelaez CE (1995) Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure modes, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:203-213. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D
5. Chang JR, Chang KH, Liao SH, Cheng CH (2006) The reliability of general vague fault-tree analysis on weapon systems fault diagnosis. Soft Comput 10:531-542. doi: 10.1007/s00500-005-0483-y
6. Ford Motor Company (1988) Potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) reference manual
7. Pillay A, Wang J (2003) Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:69-85. doi: 10.1016/ S0951-8320(02)00179-5
8. Sankar NR, Prabhu BS (2001) Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 18:324-335. doi: 10.1108/02656710110383737
9. Seyed-Hosseini SM, Safaei N, Asgharpour MJ (2006) Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:872-881. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005
10. US Department of Defense Washington, DC (1980) Procedures for performing a failure mode effects and criticality analysis, US MIL-STD-1629A
11. Wang CL (2006) Use FMEA to assess the safety of silane supply system-take TFT-LCD factory as an example. National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
12. Wang J, Ruxton T, Labrie CR (1995) Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 50:271-284. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00094-1
13. Xu K, Tang LC, Xie M, Ho SL, Zhu ML (2002) Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75:17-29. doi: 10.1016/ S0951-8320(01)00101-6
14. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Contr 8:338-353. doi: 10.1016/ S0019-9958(65)90241-X