Spatial-temporal variability of seismic hazard in peninsular India

Journal of Earth System Science

Volumn 117, Issue SUPPL.2, 2008, Pages 707-718

  Jaiswal, Kishor ^a   Sinha, Ravi ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

Maximum likelihood procedure; Seismic hazard; Seismicity; Seismotectonics; Stable continental regions

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; RIFT ZONE; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMICITY; SEISMOTECTONICS; SOURCE PARAMETERS; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; TECTONIC SETTING; TEMPORAL VARIATION; ZONATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 70350337864     PISSN: 02534126     EISSN: 02534126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-008-0065-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bhatia S C, Ravi Kumar M and Gupta H K 1999 A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions; Ann. Di. Geofisica 42(6) 1153-1166.
2. Boschi E, Giardini D, Pantost D, Valensise G, Arrowsmith R, Basham P, Burgmann R, Crone A J, Hull A, McGuire R K, Schwartz D, Sieh K, Ward S N and Yeats R S 1996 New trends in active faulting studies for seismic hazard assessment; Ann. Di. Geofisica 39 1301-1304.
3. Bozkurt S B, Stein R S and Toda S 2007 Forecasting probabilistic seismic shaking for greater Tokyo from 400 years of intensity observations; Earthquake Spectra 23 525-546.
4. Chandra U 1977 Earthquakes of peninsular India-a seismotectonic study; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65 1387-1413.
5. Cornell C A 1968 Engineering seismic risk analysis; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 1583-1606.
6. Frankel A 2004 How can seismic hazard around the New Madrid seismic zone be similar to that in California?; Seis. Res. Lett. 75 575-586.
7. Gupta H K 1992 Reservoir-induced earthquakes (Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing) 355 pp.
8. Gupta H K and Rastogi B K 1976 Dams and earthquakes (Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing) 229 pp.
9. Gutenberg B and Richter C F 1944 Frequency of earth-quakes in California; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34 185-188.
10. Jaiswal K 2006 Probabilistic seismic hazard estimation methodology for stable continental regions incorporating spatial and temporal uncertainties; Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 2006.
11. Jaiswal K and Sinha R 2005 EarthquakeInfo.org: Web-portal on earthquake disaster awareness in India; http://www.earthquakeinfo.org.
12. Jaiswal K and Sinha R 2007 Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for peninsular India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97(1B) 318-330.
13. Johnston A 1996 Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions: Part-II instrumental seismicity; Geophys. J. Int. 124 381-414.
14. Khatri K N, Rogers A M and Algermissen, S. T. 1984 A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas; Tectonophys. 10893-134.
15. Kijko A 2004 Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude mmax; Pure Appl. Geophys. 161 1655-1681.
16. Kijko A, Lasocki S and Graham G 2001 Nonparametric seismic hazard analysis in mines; Pure Appl. Geophys. 158 1655-1675.
17. Kijko A and Sellevoll M A 1989 Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I: Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 793 645-654.
18. Kijko A and Sellevoll M A 1992 Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II: Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 821 120-134.
19. McGuire R M 1993 Computation of seismic hazard; Ann. Di Geofisica 36 181-200.
20. Mohan I, Sitaram M V D and Gupta H K 1981 Some recent earthquakes in peninsular India; J. Geol. Soc. India 22 292-298.
21. Naqvi S M, Divakara Rao V and Narain H 1974 The protocontinental growth of the Indian shield and the antiquity of its rift valleys; Precramb. Res. 1 345-398.
22. National Earthquake Information Center 2003 USA PDE reportings http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/epic/
23. Page R 1968 Aftershocks and microaftershocks; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 1131-1168.
24. Raghukanth S T G and Iyengar R N 2006 Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city; Curr. Sci. 91(11) 1486-1494.
25. Rajendran C P 2000 Using geological data for earthquake studies: A perspective from peninsular India; Curr. Sci. 79(9&10) 1251-1258.
26. Rao B R 2000 Historical seismicity and deformation rates in the Indian peninsular shield; J. Seismol. 4 247-258.
27. Rao B R and Rao P S 1984 Historical seismicity of peninsular India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 2519-2533.
28. Seeber L, Armbruster J G and Jacob K H 1999 Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard for the state of Maharashtra; Report to Government of Maharashtra Earth-quake Rehabilitation Cell Mumbai.
29. Shankar D and Sharma M L 1998 Estimation of seismic hazard parameters for the Himalayas and its vicinity from complete data files; Pure Appl. Geophys. 152 267-279.
30. Sharma M L, Wason H R and Dimri R 2003 Seismic zonation of the Delhi region for bedrock ground motion; Pure Appl. Geophys. 160 2381-2398.
31. Stepp J 1973 Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in Puget Sound area; In: Seismic zoning (ed.) S T Harding, NOAA Tech. Report ERL 267-ESL30, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
32. Wang Z and Ormsbee L 2005 Comparison between proba-bilistic seismic hazard analysis and flood frequency analy-sis; EOS, Trans., AGU 86(45) 51-52.
33. Wang Z 2006 Understanding seismic hazard and risk assess-ments: An example in the New Madrid seismic zone of the Central United States; Proc. of the 8th National Confer-ence on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Fran-cisco, CA, Paper no. 416.
34. Wang Z 2007 Seismic hazard and risk assessment in the intraplate environment: The New Madrid seismic zone of the central United States; In: Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues (eds) S Stein and S Mazzotti; Geological Society of America Special Paper 425 363-373.
35. Wang Z and M Zhou 2007 Comment on Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates? by Julian J Bommer and Norman A Abrahamson; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 2212-2214.
36. Valdiya K S 1973 Tectonic framework of India: A review and interpretation of recent structural and tectonic studies; Geophys. Res. Bull. 11 79-114.
37. Veneziano D, Cornell C A and O'hara T 1984 Historic method for seismic hazard analysis; Elect. Power Res. Inst. Report, NP-3438, Palo Alto.