Measuring stroke survivors' functional status independence: five perspectives

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 600-608

  Shih, Min Mei ^a   Rogers, Joan C ^a   Skidmore, Elizabeth R ^a   Irrgang, James J ^b   Holm, Margo B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Disability evaluation; Psychometrics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350334394     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.63.5.600     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (1995). Assessment methods for patients with strokes. AHCPR Archived Clinical Practice Guidelines. Retrieved August 7, 2008, from www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/books/bv. fcgi?rid=hstat6.section. 27581
2. American Heart Association. (2008). Heart and stroke statistical update-2008. Circulation, 117, e25-el46.
3. Anemaet, W. K. (2002). Using standardized measures to meet the challenge of stroke assessment. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 18 (2), 47-62.
4. Bond, T. G., and Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2002). Inpatient rehabilitation facility-Patient Assessment Instrument. Retrieved June 22, 2008, from www.cms.hhs.gov/cmsforms/downloads/cms 10036.pdf
6. Chisholm, D. (2005). Disability in older adults with depression. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
7. Dallmeijer, A. J., Dekker, J., Roorda, L. D., Knol, D. L., van Baalen, B., de Groot, V., et al. (2005). Differential item functioning of the Functional Independence Measure in higher performing neurological patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 346-352. (Pubitemid 41823729)
8. Duncan, P. W., Jorgensen, H. S., and Wade, D. T. (2000). Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke, 31, 1429-1438.
9. Duncan, P. W., Zorowitz, R., Bates, B., Choi, J. Y., Glasberg, J. J., Graham, G. D., et al. (2005). Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: A clinical practice guideline. Stroke, 36, e100-e143.
10. Finlayson, M., Havens, B., Holm, M. B., and Denend, T. V. (2003). Integrating a performance-based observation measure of functional status into a population-based longitudinal study of aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 22, 185-195. (Pubitemid 37033628)
11. Fisher, Jr., W. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6, 238.
12. Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., and Graesham, G. E. (1988). The stroke rehabilitation outcome study-Part I: General description. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 506-509. (Pubitemid 18174554)
13. Holm, M. B., and Rogers, J. C. (2008). The performance assessment of self-care skills. In B. J. Hemphill-Pearson (Ed.), Assessments in occupational therapy mental health (2nd ed., pp. 101-110). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
14. Jennett, B., and Bond, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: A practical scale. Lancet, 1, 480-484.
15. Jennett, B., Snoek, J., Bond, M., and Brooks, N. (1981). Disability after severe head injury: Observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 44, 285-293. (Pubitemid 11070501)
16. Johnston, K., Wagner, D., Haley, E. J., and Connors, A. J. (2002). Combined clinical and imaging information as an early stroke outcome measure. Stroke, 2, 466-472. (Pubitemid 34123389)
17. Kasner, S. E. (2006). Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurology, 5, 603-612.
18. Linacre, J. M. (2007). A user's guide to WINSTEPS (3.64.1 ed.). Chicago: MESA Press.
19. Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V., and Hamilton, B. B. (1994). The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 127-132. (Pubitemid 24061483)
20. Portney, L. G., and Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Application to practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Quinn, T. J., Dawson, J., Walters, M. R., and Lees, K. R. (2008). Functional outcome assessment in contemporary stroke trials. Stroke, 39, 692.
22. Rogers, J. C., and Holm, M. B. (1998). Evaluation of occupational performance areas. Section 1: Evaluation of activities of daily living and home management. In M. E. Neistadt and E. B. Crepeau (Eds.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (9th ed., pp. 185-208). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
23. Shah, S., Vanclay, F., and Cooper, B. (1989). Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 703-709. (Pubitemid 19213114)
24. Shinar, D., Gross, C. R., Bronstein, K. S., and Licata-Gehr, E. E. (1987). Reliability of the Activities of Daily Living Scale and its use in telephone interview. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 723-728. (Pubitemid 17149890)
25. Tesio, L. (2003). Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 105-115. (Pubitemid 36681702)
26. Tilley, B. C., Marler, J. R., Geller, N. L., and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NINDS] rt-PA Stroke Trial Study. (1996). Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke, 27, 2136-2142.
27. Tyson, S., and Turner, G. (2000). Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: What happens and why. Clinical Rehabilitation, 76, 51152-1155. (Pubitemid 30488755)
28. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. (1997). Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation [including the FLM instrument (Version 5.1)]. Buffalo: State University of New York.
29. Uyttenboogaart, M., Stewart, R. E., Vroomen, P. C. A. J., De Keyser, J., and Luijckx, G.-J. (2005). Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke, 36, 1984-1987. (Pubitemid 41266538)
30. van Boxel, Y. J. J. M., Roest, F. H. J., Bergen, M. P., and Stam, H. J. (1995). Dimensionality and hierarchical structure of disability measurement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 1152-1155.
31. Van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J. A., and van Gijn, J. (1988). Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke, 19, 604-607. (Pubitemid 18126965)
32. Wade, D. T., and Collin, C. (1988). The Barthel Index: A standard measure of physical disability. International Disability Studies, 10 (2), 64-67. (Pubitemid 18159442)
33. Wilson, J. T. L., Pettigrew, L. E. L., and Teasdale, G. M. (1998). Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma, 15, 573-585.
34. Wolfe, C. D. A., Taub, N. A., Woodrow, E. J., and Burney, P. G. J. (1991). Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients. Stroke, 22, 1242-1244.
35. Wolfe, F., Hawley, D. J., Doldenberg, D. L., Russell, I. J., Buskila, D., and Neumann, L. (2000). The assessment of functional impairment in fibromyalgia (FM) : Rasch analyses of 5 functional scales and the development of the FM health assessment questionnaire. Journal of Rheumatology, 27, 1989-1999. (Pubitemid 30670493)
36. Woodson, A. M. (2002). Stroke. In C. A. Trombly and M. V. Radomski (Eds.), Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction (5th ed., pp. 817-853). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
37. Wright, B. D. (1996). Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9, 472.
38. Wright, B. D., and Masters, G. N. (1996). Number of person on item strata. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16, 888.