Using patient experience within pay for performance programmes

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 339, Issue 7727, 2009, Pages 930-

  Salisbury, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

FAMILY PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 70350313021     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4224     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. NHS Employers. Quality and outcomes framework guidance for GMS contract 2009/10. 2009. www.nhsemployers.org/Aboutus/Publications/Documents/QOF-Guidance- 2009-final.pdf.
2. Roland M, Elliot M, Lyratzopoulos G, Barbiere J, Parker RA, Smith P, et al. Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England. BMJ 2009;339:b3851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Ipsos MORI. The GP Patient Survey 2008/09 technical report. 2009. www.gp-patient.co.uk/results/England%20Technical%20Report%2008-09.pdf.
4. Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta analysis. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:811-818[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. GP Patient Survey 2008/9 summary report. www.gp-patient.co.uk/results /GPPS%20National%20Summary%20Report.pdf.
6. Department of Health. GP Patient Survey confidence intervals. 2009. www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/ digitalasset/dh-101718.pdf.
7. Department of Health. Statement of financial entitlements (amendment) (no 5) directions 2008. 2008.www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsLegislation/DH-089663.
8. Salisbury C, Montgomery AA, Simons L, Sampson F, Edwards S, Baxter H, et al. Impact of advanced access on access, workload, and continuity: controlled before-and-after and simulated-patient study. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:608-614[Web of Science][Medline] (Pubitemid 47232628)
9. Mead N, Roland M. Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices. BMJ 2009;339:b3450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Heje HN, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Olesen F. Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients' evaluation of their general practitioner. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:178.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Goodall S, Montgomery A, Banks J, Salisbury C, Sampson F, Pickin M. Implementation of advanced access in general practice: postal survey of practices. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:918-923[Web of Science] [Medline] (Pubitemid 44941789)
12. Triggle N. Are doctors earning their crust? BBC News 2006 Apr 18. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4918680.stm.