Efficient gradient projection methods for edge-preserving removal of Poisson noise

Inverse Problems

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Zanella, R ^a   Boccacci, P ^b   Zanni, L ^a   Bertero, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; DISCREPANCY PRINCIPLE; EDGE PRESERVING; EDGE-PRESERVING REGULARIZATION; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; GRADIENT PROJECTION METHODS; GRADIENT PROJECTIONS; IMAGE DE-NOISING; IMAGE DEBLURRING; IMAGE MODELS; KULLBACK LEIBLER DIVERGENCE; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PHOTON COUNTING; POISSON NOISE; REGULARIZATION PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; TOTAL VARIATION; WAVELET THRESHOLDING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); IMAGE PROCESSING; NUMERICAL METHODS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; POISSON EQUATION; TOMOGRAPHY;

CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 70350309491     PISSN: 02665611     EISSN: 13616420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/4/045010     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alvarez L, Lions P L and Morel J M 1992 Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion II SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29 845-66
2. Anscombe F J 1948 The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data Biometrika 35 246-54
3. Bardsley J M 2008 An efficient computational method for total variation-penalized Poisson likelihood estimation Inverse Problems Imaging 2 167-85
4. Bardsley J and Nagy J 2006 Covariance-preconditioned iterative methods for non-negatively constrained astronomical imaging SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 27 1184-98
5. Barzilai J and Borwein J M 1988 Two point step size gradient methods IMA J. Numer. Anal. 8 141-48
6. Bonettini S, Zanella R and Zanni L 2009 A scaled gradient projection method for constrained image deblurring Inverse Problems 25 015002
7. Buades A, Coll B and Morel J M 2005 A review of image denoising algorithms with a new one Multiscale Model. Simul. 4 490-530
8. Calvetti D and Somersalo E 2007 A Gaussian hypermodel for recovering blocky objects Inverse Problems 23 733-54
9. Chan R H and Chen K 2007 Multilevel algorithms for a Poisson noise removal model with total-variation regularization Int. J. Comput. Math. 84 1183-98
10. Chan T F and Shen J 2005 Image Processing and Analysis (Philadelphia, PA: SIAM)
11. Charbonnier P 1994 Reconstruction d'image: Régularization avec prise en compte des discontinuités PhD dissertation Univ. Nce-Sophia Antipolis available at http://picabia.u-strasbg.fr/lsiit/perso/Charbonnier.htm
12. Charbonnier P, Blanc-Féraud L, Aubert G and Barlaud A 1997 Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6 298-311
13. Coifman R R and Donoho D 1995 Translation-invariant denoising Lecture Notes in Statistics vol 103 (Berlin: Springer) pp 125-50
14. Csiszár I 1991 Why least squares and maximum entropy? An axiomatic approach to inference for linear inverse problems Ann. Stat. 19 2032-66
15. Engl H W, Hanke M and Neubauer A 1996 Regularization of Inverse Problems (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
16. Dai Y H, Hager W W, Schittkowski K and Zhang H 2006 The cyclic Barzilai-Borwein method for unconstrained optimization IMA J. Numer. Anal. 26 604-27
17. Donoho D 1995 De-noising by soft thresholding IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41 613-27
18. Figueiredo M A T, Nowak R D and Wright S J 2007 Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: Application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 1 586-97
19. Frassoldati G, Zanghirati G and Zanni L 2008 New adaptive stepsize selections in gradient methods J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 4 299-312
20. Geman S and Geman D 1984 Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration of images IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6 721-41
21. Geman S and McClure D E 1985 Bayesian image analysis: an application to single photon emission tomography Proc. Statistical Computation Section (Washington, DC: American Statistical Association) pp 12-8
22. Geman S, Manbeck K and McClure D E 1993 A comprehensive statistical model for single photon emission tomography Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications ed R Chellappa and A Jain (Boston: Academic) pp 93-130
23. Green J P 1990 Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 9 84-93
24. Johnson N L, Katz S and Kemps A W 1993 Univariate Discrete Distributions (New York: Wiley) p 157
25. Lanteri H, Roche M and Aime C 2002 Penalized maximum likelihood image restoration with positivity constraints: multiplicative algorithms Inverse Problems 18 1397-419
26. Le T, Chartran R and Asaki T J 2007 A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by Poisson noise J. Math. Imaging Vis. 27 257-63
27. Osher S, Burger M, Goldfarb D, Xu J and Yin W 2005 An iterative regularization method for total-variation based image restoration Multiscale Model. Simul. 4 460-89
28. Perona P and Malik J 1990 Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12 629-39
29. Politte D G and Snyder D L 1991 Correction for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 82-9
30. Rudin L I, Osher S and Fatemi E 1992 Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms Physica D 60 259-68
31. Vogel C 2002 Computational Methods for Inverse Problems (Philadelphia, PA: SIAM)
32. Zhang B, Fadili J M and Starck J-L 2008 Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets for Poisson noise removal available at http://jstarck.free.fr/IEEE-Poisson08. pdf
33. Zhou B, Gao L and Dai Y H 2006 Gradient methods with adaptive step-sizes Comput. Optim. Appl. 35 69-86