Voice profile after type I or II laser chordectomies for T1a glottic carcinoma

Head and Neck

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1502-1510

  Sjögren, Elisabeth V ^a   Van Rossum, Maya A ^a   Langeveld, Ton P M ^a   Voerman, Marika S ^a   Van De Kamp, Vivienne A H ^a   Baatenburg De Jong, Robert J ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Glottic; Larynx; Laser; T1; Voice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LARYNX CARCINOMA; LASER CHORDECTOMY; LASER SURGERY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; VOICE; VOICE CHANGE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGECTOMY; LASER THERAPY; LASERS, GAS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONATION; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 70350304600     PISSN: 10433074     EISSN: 10970347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hed.21128     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sjogren EV, Rossum MA, Langeveld APM, et al. Voice outcome in T1a midcord glottic carcinoma: laser versus radiotherapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:965-972.
2. Dejonckere PH. Clinical implementation of a multidimensional basic protocol for assessing functional results of voice therapy. A preliminary study. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2000;121:311-313.
3. Dejonckere PH. Assessing efficacy of voice treatments: a guideline. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2000;121:307-310.
4. Ledda GP, Grover N, Pundir V, Masala E, Puxeddu R. Functional outcomes after CO2 laser treatment of early glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1007-1011. (Pubitemid 44318007)
5. Peretti G, Piazza C, Balzanelli C, Cantarella G, Nicolai P. Vocal outcome after endoscopic cordectomies for Tis and T1 glottic carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112:174-179. (Pubitemid 36193951)
6. Peretti G, Piazza C, Bolzoni A, et al. Analysis of recurrences in 322 Tis, T1, or T2 glottic carcinomas treated by carbon dioxide laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2004;113:853-858.
7. Roh JL, Kim DH, Kim SY, Park CI. Quality of life and voice in patients after laser cordectomy for Tis and T1 glottic carcinomas. Head Neck 2007;29:1010-1016.
8. Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A, et al. Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257:227-231.
9. Remacle M, Van Haverbeke C, Eckel H, et al. Proposal for revision of the European Laryngological Society classification of endoscopic cordectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:499-504. (Pubitemid 46569963)
10. Isshiki N, Okamura H, Tanabe M, Morimoto M. Differential diagnosis of hoarseness. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1969;21:9-19.
11. Boersma P, Weenink D. PRAAT manual: a system for doing phonetics by computer, Report No. 132. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam; 1996.
12. Hirano M, Bless D. Videostroboscopic examination of the larynx. San Diego, CA: Singular; 2007.
13. De Bodt M, Jacobson B, Musschoot S, et al. De Voice Handicap Index, een instrument voor het kwantificeren van psychosociale consequenties van stemstoornissen. Logopedie 2000;13:29-33.
14. van Gogh CD, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Boon-Kamma BA, et al. The efficacy of voice therapy in patients after treatment for early glottic carcinoma.Cancer 2006;106:95-105.
15. Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:796-809.
16. Jeannon JP, Carding PN, Wilson JA. Vocim analysis of laryngeal images: is breathiness related to the glottic area? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998;23:351-353.
17. Blomgren M, Chen Y, Ng ML, Gilbert HR. Acoustic, aerodynamic, physiologic, and perceptual properties of modal and vocal fry registers. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:2649-2658. (Pubitemid 28261598)
18. Emanuel F, Scarinzi A. Vocal register effects on vowel spectral noise and roughness: findings for adult males. J Commun Disord 1980;13:121-131.
19. Bouwers F, Dikkers, FG. A retrospective study concerning the psychosocial impact of voice disorders: voice handicap index change in patients with benign voice disorders after treatment. J Voice 2009;23:218-224.
20. van Gogh CD, Mahieu HF, Kuik DJ, Rinkel RN, Langendijk JA, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Voice in early glottic cancer compared to benign voice pathology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:1033-1038.
21. Behrman A, Sulica L, He T. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1693-1700. (Pubitemid 39332239)
22. Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, Horne R. The Illness Perception Questionnaire: a new method for assessing the congitive representation of illness. Psychol Health 1996;11:431-445. (Pubitemid 126061513)
23. Ma EP, Yiu EM. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2005;57:38-47.
24. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice. J Acoust SocAm2005;117:2201-2211.
25. Baken JR. Irregularity of vocal fold period and amplitude: a first approach to fractal analysis of voice. J Voice 1990;4:185-197.
26. Little MA, McSharry PE, Roberts SJ, Costello DAE, Moroz IM. Exploiting nonlinear recurrence and fractal scaling properties for voice disorder detection. Biomed Eng Online 2007;6:23.