Confidentiality: A contested value

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 59, Issue 567, 2009, Pages 718-719

  Davies, Peter ^a  

^a Surgery   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSULTATION; DATA BASE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; EPILEPSY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY;

CONFIDENTIALITY; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS;

EID: 70350284271     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X472566     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Bourke J, Wessely S. Confidentiality. BMJ 2008; 336(7649): 888-891.
2. General Medical Council. Confidentiality: protecting and providing information, 2004. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/current/library/ confidentiality.asp (accessed 10 Sept 2009).
3. Elger BS. Violations of medical confidentiality: opinions of primary care physicians. Br J Gen Pract 2009; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X472647.
4. Vigod SN, Bell CM, Bohnen JM. Privacy of patients' information in hospital lifts: observational study. BMJ 2003; 327: 1024-1025.
5. Gerada C, Field S. RCGP supports use of Summary Care Records. BMJ 2009; 338: b2516.
6. Kmietowicz Z. News: Tories promise to scrap 'top-down, bureaucratic' NHS IT programme. BMJ 2009; 339: b3284.
7. Anderson R. Confidentiality and Connecting for Health. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58(547): 75-76.
8. Newdick C. Who should we treat? Rights, rationing, and resources in the NHS. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
9. Wellcome Trust. Towards Consensus for Best Practice: use of patient records from general practice for research. London: Wellcome Trust, 2009. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/GPrecords (accessed 10 Sept 2009).
10. Kelsey T. Long live the database state. Prospect 2009; 161: http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/07/longlive thedatabasestate (accessed 10 Sept 2009).