Seismic performance testing of partially and fully anchored wood-frame shear walls

Wood and Fiber Science

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 396-413

  White, Kevin B D ^a   Miller, Thomas H ^b   Gupta, Rakesh ^a,c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Oregon State University   (United States)

^c SWST   (United States)

Author keywords

FEMA 356; Seismic performance; Shear wall; Wood frame

Indexed keywords

ANCHOR BOLTS; ANCHORED WALL; CYCLIC TESTING; CYCLIC TESTS; DESIGN LEVELS; DOUGLAS FIR; EARTHQUAKE LOAD; FEMA 356; GROUND MOTIONS; GYPSUM WALLBOARDS; HOLD-DOWNS; INITIAL STIFFNESS; MAXIMUM LOAD; MONOTONIC TESTS; ORIENTED STRANDBOARD PANELS; SEATTLE; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; STRIKE-SLIP EARTHQUAKES; STRIKE-SLIP FAULT; SUBDUCTION ZONES; TIME HISTORY;

BUILDING MATERIALS; CYCLIC LOADS; EARTHQUAKES; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENERGY DISSIPATORS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; GYPSUM; SEISMIC WAVES; SHEAR WALLS; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; STIFFNESS; WOOD;

TESTING;

CALCIUM SULFATE; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; CYCLIC LOADS; DISSIPATION FACTOR; ENERGY; FAILURE; FRAMES; STIFFNESS; TESTING; WOOD;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 70350270313     PISSN: 07356161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ASTM (2001) Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of framed walls for buildings. E 2126-02a. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
2. City of Los Angeles/UC Irvine (2001) Light frame test committee 2001, report of a testing program of light framed walls with wood-sheathed shear panels, final report to the City of Los Angeles. Dept. of Building Safety, Los Angeles, CA. 93 pp.
3. Cobeen K, Russell J, Dolan DJ (2004) Recommendations for earthquake resistance in the design and construction of woodframe buildings. CUREE Publication No. W-30b. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
4. Dinehart DW, Shenton HW III (1998) Comparison of static and dynamic response of timber shear walls. J Struct Eng 124(6):686-695.
5. Dolan JD, Madsen B (1992) Monotonic and cyclic tests of timber shear walls. Can J Civil Eng 19(3):415-422.
6. FEMA (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Rep. No. 356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. 518 pp.
7. Filiatrault A, Foschi R (1991) Static and dynamic tests of timber shear walls fastened with nails and wood adhesive. Can J Civil Eng 18(5):749-755.
8. Gatto K, Uang CM (2003) Effects of loading protocol on the cyclic response of woodframe shearwalls. J Struct Eng 129(10):1384-1393.
9. He M, Lam F, Prion HGL (1998) Influence of cyclic test protocols on performance of wood-based shear walls. Can J Civil Eng 25(6):539-550.
10. ICC (2000) International Residential Code. International Code Council, Whittier, CA.
11. ISO (1998) Timber structures - Joints made with mechanical fasteners - Quasi-static reversed-cyclic test method, WG7 draft, ISO TC 165. International Organization for Standardization, Secretariat Standards Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
12. Karacabeyli E, Ceccotti A (1998) Nailed wood-frame shear walls for seismic Loads: test results and design considerations. Paper T207-6 in Structural Engineering World Wide. Elsevier Science, New York, NY.
13. Krawinkler H, Parisi F, Ibarra L, Ayoub A, Medina R (2001) Development of a testing protocol for woodframe structures, CUREE pub W-02. Richmond, CA.
14. Malik AM (1995) Estimating building stocks for earthquake mitigation and recovery planning. Cornell Inst for Soc and Econ Res, Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY.
15. McMullin KM, Merrick DS (2000) Seismic testing of light frame shear walls. Paper No 5-4-1 in Proc 6th World Conf on Timber Eng, 31 July to 3 Aug, 2000, Whistler, BC.
16. Ni C, Karacabeyli E (2002) Capacity of shear wall segments without hold-downs. Wood Design Focus 12(2):10-17.
17. Pardoen GC, Kazanjy RP, Freund E, Hamilton CH, Larsen D, Shah N, Smith A (2000) Results from the City of Los Angeles-UC Irvine shear wall test program. Paper 1.1.1 on CD in Proc 6th World Conf on Timber Eng, 31 July to 3 Aug 2000, Whistler, BC.
18. PCA (1997) Home builder report of 1997. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
19. Salenikovich AJ, Dolan JD (2003a) The racking performance of shear walls with various aspect ratios, part 1, monotonic tests of fully anchored walls. Forest Prod J 53(10):65-73.
20. Salenikovich AJ, Dolan JD (2003b) The racking performance of shear walls with various aspect ratios, part 2, cyclic tests of fully anchored walls. Forest Prod J 53(11-12):37-45.
21. Seaders P, Gupta R, Miller TH (2009a) Monotonic and cyclic load testing of partially and fully anchored woodframe shear walls. Wood Fiber Sci 41(2):145-156.
22. Seaders P, Miller TH, Gupta R (2009b) Performance of partially and fully anchored wood-frame shear walls under earthquake loads. Forest Prod J (in press).
23. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Sun J (1997) Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project, Report No. SAC/BD-97/04. SAC joint venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
24. Uang CM (2001) Loading protocol and rate of loading effects - Draft report. CUREE Caltech wood frame project, Richmond, CA.
25. USGS (2004a) US Geological Society. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/ usa/1994_01_17.html (2 Nov. 2004).
26. USGS (2004b) US Geological Society. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/states/ top_states.html. (2 Nov. 2004).
27. Yamaguchi N, Karacabeyli E, Minowa C, Kawai N, Watanabe K, Nakamura I (2000) Seismic performance of nailed wood-frame walls. Paper No 8-1-1 in Proc World Conf. on Timber Eng, 31 July to 3 Aug 2000, Whistler, BC.