What fitness can't be

Erkenntnis

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 289-301

  Ariew, André ^a   Ernst, Zachary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350257607     PISSN: 01650106     EISSN: 15728420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-009-9183-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ariew, A., & Lewontin, R. (2004). Confusions of fitness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,55, 347-363.
2. Beatty, J. (1998). Fitness: Theoretical contexts. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Beatty, J., & Finsen, S. (1998). Rethinking the propensity interpretation: A peek inside pandora's box. In M. Ruse (Ed.), What the philosophy of biology is: Essays dedicated to David Hull (pp. 17-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bouchard, F., & Rosenberg, A. (2004). Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,55, 693-712.
5. Brandon, R. (1990). Adaptation and environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Charlesworth, B., & Giesel, J. T. (1972). Selection in populations with overlapping generations ii: Relations between gene frequency change and demographic variables. American Naturalist,106, 388-401.
7. Demetrius, L. (1992). Growth rate, population entropy and evolutionary dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology,41, 208-236.
8. Gillespie, J. H. (1973). Natural selection with varying selection coefficients a haploid model. Genetical Research,21, 115-120.
9. Gillespie, J. H. (1974). Natural selection for within-generation variance in off-spring number. Genetics,76, 601-606.
10. Gillespie, J. H. (1977). Natural selection for variances in off-spring numbers a new evolutionary principle. American Naturalist,111, 1010-1014.
11. Humphreys P. (1985). Why Propensities Cannot Be Probabilities. Philosophical Review, (O 85) 94, 557-570.
12. Matthen, M., & Ariew, A. (2002). Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. Journal of Philosophy,49(2), 53-83.
13. Matthen, M., & Ariew, A. (2005). How to understand causal relations in natural selection: A reply to Rosenberg and Bouchard. Biology and Philosophy,20(2-3), 355-364.
14. Maynard Smith, J. (1976). Group selection. Quarterly Review of Biology,51, 277-283.
15. Millstein, R. (2006). Natural selection as a population-level causal process. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,57, 627-653.
16. Rosenberg, A. (2006). Darwinian reductionism. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
17. Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world (p. 205). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Sober, E. (1993). The philosophy of biology. Boulder: Westview Press.
19. Sober, E. (2000). Two faces of fitness. In R. S. Singh, et al. (Eds.), Thinking about evolution: Historical, philosophical, and political perspectives (pp. 309-321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Walsh, D., Lewens, T., & Ariew, A. (2002). Trials of life: Natural selection and random drift. Philosophy of Science,69, 429-446.
21. Wright, S. (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics,28, 114-138.
22. Wright, S. (1945). Tempo and mode in evolution: A critical review. Ecology,26, 415-419.
23. Wright, S. (1969). The theory of gene frequencies, volume 2 of evolution and the genetics of populations: A treatise in three volumes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.