Promoting regional innovation systems in a global context

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 123-139

  Nuur, Cali ^a   Gustavsson, Linda ^a   Laestadius, Staffan ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Innovation policy; Innovation systems; Regional innovation systems; Regionalization of innovation policy

Indexed keywords

DOWNSCALING; ECONOMIC POLICY; GLOBALIZATION; INNOVATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY MAKING; REGIONALIZATION; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 70350217435     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: 14698390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13662710902728142     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995) Globalisation, institutional "thickness" and local economy, in: P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham & A. Madanipour (Eds), Managing Cities, the New Urban Context, pp. 91-108 (Chichester: John Wiley).
2. Archibugi, D., Howells, J. and Michie, J. (1999) Innovation Policy in a Global Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
3. Asheim, B. (2000) Industrial districts: the contributions of Marshall and beyond, in: G. Clark, M. Feldmann & M. Gertler (Eds), Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, pp. 413-431 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
4. Asheim, B. and Coenen, L. (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters, Research Policy, 34(8), pp. 1173-1190.
5. Asheim, B. and Gertler, M. (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems, in: J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 291-317 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), pp. 31-56.
7. Becattini, G. (1992) The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion, in: F. Pyke, G. Becattini & W. Sengenberger (Eds) (1990), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy, pp. 123-135 (Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies).
8. Benner, M. (2001) Kontrovers och consensus-vetenskap och politik i svenskt 90-tal (Stockholm: Sister, Nya Doxa).
9. Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. (1997) Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries, in: C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, pp. 130-155 (London: Pinter).
10. Carlsson, B. (1997) Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic).
11. Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Malden, MA: Blackwell).
12. Cooke, P. (2005) Rational drug design, the knowledge value chain and bioscience megacentres, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(3), pp. 325-341.
13. Cooke, P. (2007) To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms, European Planning Studies, 15(2), pp. 179-194.
14. Dunning, J. H. (2000) Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Issues Stated (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
15. Edquist, C. (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (London: Pinter).
16. Edquist, C. (2000) Innovationssystemansatser-deras utveckling och kännetecken, in: B. Carlsson, C. Edquist, G. Eliasson, S. Jacobsson & Å. Lindholm Dahlstrand (Eds), Innovationssystem, kluster och kompetensblock-fyra essäer om innovationer, tillväxt och sysselsättning, pp. 25-70 (Stockholm: Ra °det fö r Arbetslivsforskning).
17. Edquist, C. (2001) The systems of innovation approach and innovation policy: an account of the state of the art, DRUID Working Paper, DRUID, Aalborg, Denmark.
18. Freeman, C. (1987) Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan (London: Pinter).
19. Freeman, C. (2002) Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems-complementarily and economic growth, Research Policy, 31(2), pp. 191-211.
20. Friedman, T. (2005) The World is Flat-A Brief History of the Globalized World in the 21st Century (London: Penguin, Allen Lane).
21. Gertler, M. and Levitte, Y. (2005) Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology, Industry and Innovation, 12(4), pp. 487-507.
22. Gertler, M. and Wolfe, D. A. (2004) Ontario's regional innovation system; the evolution of knowledge-based institutional assets, in: P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich & H. Braczyk (Eds), Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, pp. 91-124 (New York: Routledge).
23. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge (London: Sage).
24. Gustavsson, L. and Laestadius, S. (2006) Innovationssystem som politisk praktik- en studie av Vinnväxtprojektet Robotdalen, KTH Working Paper, Stockholm.
25. Gustavsson, L. and Laestadius, S. (2007) Innovationssystem som politisk praktik- en studie av Vinnväxtprojektet Robotdalen, in: S. Laestadius, C. Nuur & H. Ylinenpää(Eds), Regional växtkraft i en global ekonomi-Det svenska vinnväxt programmet (Stockholm: Santérus).
26. Isaksen, A. (2001) Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy?, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), pp. 101-120.
27. Kenney, M. and Florida, R. (2004) Locating Global Advantage: Industry Dynamics in the International Economy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
28. Laestadius, L. (2005) Det dahménska utvecklingblocket-nå gra reflektioner, in: M. Benner (Ed.), Innovationer-omvandling och dynamik, pp. 19-32 (Stockholm: Studentlitteratur).
29. Laestadius, S. and Nuur, C. (2006) Triple Steelix-a regional innovation system in the making?, KTH Working Paper, Stockholm.
30. Laestadius, S., Nuur, C. and Ylinenpää, H. (2007) Regional växtkraft i en global ekonomi-Det svenska Vinnväxtprogrammet (Stockholm: Santérus).
31. Leydesdorff, L. and Etzkowitz, H. (1998) The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies, Science and Public Policy, 25(3), pp. 195-203.
32. Lorenzen, M. (2005) Knowledge and geography, Industry and Innovation, 12(4), pp. 399-407.
33. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation-Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (London: Pinter).
34. Lundvall, B.-Å. and Borra ́s, S. (1997) The globalising learning economy-implications for policy. Report based on contributions from seven projects under the TSER programme, DG XII, Commission of the European Union.
35. Lundvall, B.-Å. and Borra ́s, S. (2005) Science, technology and innovation policy, in: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery & R. Nelson (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 599-631 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
36. Marklund, G. (1994) Institutions and appropriation in Swedish technology policy: the case of STU's grants to process control technology for pulp and paper production 1968-1991, Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
37. Markusen, A. (1996) Sticky places in a slippery space: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72(3), pp. 293-313.
38. Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume (Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University).
39. Maskell, P. (1998) Small versus large economies-a question of openness, in: P. Maskell, H. Eskelinen, I. Hannibalsson, A. Malmberg & E. Vatne (Eds), Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development: Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies (London: Routledge).
40. Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. (1999) Localised learning and industrial competitiveness, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), pp. 167-186.
41. Miettinen, R. (2002) National Innovation System-Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric (Helsinki: Edita).
42. Nilsson, J.-E. and Uhlin, Å. (2002) Regionala Innovationssystem: en fö rdjupad kunskapsö versikt, VINNOVA Rapport, VR 2002:03.
43. Nuur, C. and Laestadius, S. (2007) Stuck in the middle?-a case study of the underutilised potential in peripheral regions in developed countries in the age of globalisation, Journal of Rural and Community Development, pp. 44-63.
44. Oughton, C., Landabaso, M. and Morgan, K. (2002) The regional innovation paradox: innovation policy and industrial policy, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), pp. 97-110.
45. Perroux, F. (1950) Economic space: theory and applications, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1), pp. 89-104.
46. Porter, M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (London: Macmillan).
47. Romer, P. (1990) Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98(S5), pp. 71-102.
48. Ronde ́/, P. and Hussler, C. (2005) Innovation in regions: what does really matter?, Research Policy, 34(8), pp. 1150-1172.
49. Schienstock, G., Kantonen, M. and Koski, P. (2004) Escaping the path dependence: the case of Tampere, Finland, in: P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich & H. Braczyk (Eds), Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, pp. 127-153 (New York: Routledge).
50. Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach, Research Policy, 34(8), pp. 1203-1219.
51. Weinberger, T. (1996) Nätverksentreprenören [Network Entrepreneur] (Falun: Kungliga Tekniska Hö gskolan).