Activity of dehydrogenases catalase and urease in copper polluted soil;Aktywność dehydrogenaz, katalazy i ureazy w glebach zanieczyszczonych miedzią

Journal of Elementology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 605-617

  Wyszkowska, Jadwiga ^a   Kucharski, Miroslaw ^a   Kucharski, Jan ^a   Borowik, Agata ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Copper; Enzymatic activity; Soil contamination with copper; Tolerance index; Vulnerability index

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVENA; BRASSICA NAPUS; HORDEUM; LUPINUS LUTEUS;

EID: 70350217426     PISSN: 16442296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2009.14.3.19     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alef K, Nannipieri P. (eds) 1998. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press. Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers, London: pp. 576.
2. Bielinska E.J. 2005. Determination of phosphatases acivity. Acta Agroph., Rozprawy i Mono-grafie, 3: 63-74.
3. 2O reduction declines with time in laboratory spiked a oils and is undetectable in field contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39: 3167-3176.
4. Dijkstra F.A. Cheng W. Johnson D.W. 2006. Plant biomass influences rhizosphere priming effects on soil organic matter decomposition in two differently managed soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 38: 2519-2526.
5. Karlen D., Ditzler C.A., Andrews S.S. 2003. Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma., 114: 145-146.
6. Mertens J., Ruyters S., Springael D., Smolders E. 2007. Resistance and resilience of zinc tolerant nitrying communities is unaffected in log-term zinc contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39: 1828-1831.
7. Mikanova O., Kubat J., Mikhailovskaya N., Voros I., Biro B. 2001. Influence of heavy metal pollution on some soil biological parameters in the alluvium of the Litavka river. Rostl. Vyr., 47(3): 117-122.
8. Öhlinger R. 1996. Dehydrogenase activity with the substrate TTC. In: Methods in Soil Biology. Schinner F., Ohlinger R., Kandeler E., Margesin R. (eds), Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 241-243.
9. Oliveira A., Pampulha M.E. 2006. Effects of long-term heavy metal contamination on soil microbial characteristics. J. Bios. Bioeng. 102 (3): 157-161.
10. Orwin K.H, Wardle D.A. 2004. New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 36: 19-7-1912.
11. Renella G. Mench M., Landi L., Nannipieri P. 2005. Microbial activity and hydrolase synthesis in long-term Cd-contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 37: 133-139.
12. Schoencholtz S.H., Van Miegroet, Burger J.A. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecol. Managem., 138: 335-356.
13. Shumaker K.L., Begonia G. 2005. Heavy metal uptake, translocation, and bioaccumulation studies of Triticum aestivum cultivated in contaminated dredged materials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 2(2): 293-298.
14. StatSoft, Inc. 2006. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 7.1. www.stat-soft.com.
15. Wyszkowska J., Boros E., Kucharski J. 2008. Enzymatic activity of nickel-contaminated soil. J. Elementol. 13 (1): 139-151.
16. Wyszkowska J., Kucharski J., Boros E. 2005a. Biochemical properties of soil contaminated with nickel and other heavy metals. J. Elementol., 10 (3): 585-596.
17. Wyszkowska J., Kucharski J., Lajszner W. 2005. Effect of soil contamination with copper on its enzymatic activity. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 14(5): 119-124.