The tonal component of Estonian quantity in native and non-native perception

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 388-396

  Lippus, Pärtel ^a   Pajusalu, Karl ^a   Allik, Jüri ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350210466     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aoyama K., and Guion S.G. Prosody in second language acquisition. Acoustic analyses of duration and F0 range. In: Bohn O.-S., and Munro M.J. (Eds). Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, Language Learning and Language Teaching, Vol. 17 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia 281-297
2. Asu, E. L. (2004). The phonetics and phonology of Estonian intonation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge.
3. Asu, E. L., Lippus, P., Teras, P., & Tuisk, T. (in press). The realization of Estonian quantity characteristics in spontaneous speech. In M. Vainio, R. Aulanko, & O. Aaltonen (Eds.), Nordic prosody. Proceedings of the Xth conference, Helsinki.
4. Best C.T., and Tyler M.D. Nonnative and second-language speech perception. Commonalities and complementarities. In: Bohn O.-S., and Munro M.J. (Eds). Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, Language Learning and Language Teaching, Vol. 17 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia 13-34
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, Version 4.6.02 [Computer program]. Retrieved May 17, 2007, from 〈http://www.praat.org/〉.
6. Bond Z.S., Stockmal V., and Markus D. Sixty years of bilingualism affects the pronunciation of Latvian vowels. Language Variation and Change 18 (2006) 165-177
7. Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., and Segui J. Limits of bilingualism. Nature 340 6230 (1989) 229-230
8. Eek A. Further information on the perception of Estonian quantity. Estonian Papers in Phonetics 1979 (1980) 31-57
9. Eek, A., & Meister, E. (1997). Simple perception experiments on Estonian word prosody: Foot structure vs. segmental quantity. In I. Lehiste, & J. Ross (Eds.), Estonian prosody: Papers from a symposium (pp. 71-98). Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language.
10. Eek A., and Meister E. Quality of standard Estonian vowels in stressed and unstressed syllables of the feet in three distinctive quantity degrees. Linguistica Uralica 3 34 (1998) 226-233
11. Eek, A., & Meister, E. (2003). Foneetilisi katseid ja arutlusi kvantiteedi alalt (I). Häälikukestusi muutvad kontekstid ja välde. Keel ja Kirjandus, 11-12, 815-837, 904-918.
12. Eek, A., & Meister, E. (2004). Foneetilisi katseid ja arutlusi kvantiteedi alalt (II). Takt, silp ja välde. Keel ja Kirjandus, 4-5, 251-271, 336-357.
13. Järvikivi, J., Aalto, D., Aulanko, R., & Vainio, M. (2007). Perception of vowel length: Tonality cues categorization even in a quantity language. In J. Trouvain, & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences: 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6-10 August 2007 (pp. 693-696).
14. Karins, A. K. (1996). The prosodic structure of Latvian. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
15. Kodzasov & Krivnova=K{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}d{cyrillic}z{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}, S{cyrillic}.V{cyrillic}. & K{cyrillic}r{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}, Ο. F{cyrillic}. (2001). Οβ{curled}shch{cyrillic}a{script}ya{cyrillic} f{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}muk{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}. M{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}k{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}: R{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}i{cyrillic, short}s{cyrillic}k{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}i{cyrillic, short} rocyd{cyrillic}a{script}pt{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}en{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}y{cyrillic}i{cyrillic, short} G{cyrillic}ym{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}r{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}y{cyrillic}i{cyrillic, short} u{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}r{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}.
16. Krull D. Stability in some Estonian duration relations. Phonetic experimental research. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (PERILUS) 13 (1991), Stockholm University, Stockholm 57-60
17. Krull D. Temporal and tonal correlates to quantity in Estonian. Phonetic experimental research. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (PERILUS) 15 (1992), Stockholm University, Stockholm 17-36
18. Lehiste, I. (1960). Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. In American studies in uralic linguistics 1, Bloomington (pp. 21-82).
19. Lehiste I. Experiments with synthetic speech concerning quantity in Estonian. In: Hallap V. (Ed). Congressus Tertius Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Tallinae habitus, 17-23. VIII 1970. Pars I: Acta Linguistica (1970-1975), Valgus, Tallinn 254-269
20. Lehiste, I. (1997). Search for phonetic correlates in Estonian Prosody. In I. Lehiste, & J. Ross (Eds.), Estonian prosody: Papers from a symposium (pp. 11-35). Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language.
21. Lehiste I. Prosodic change in progress: From quantity language to accent language. In: Fikkert P., and Jacobs H. (Eds). Development in prosodic systems, Studies in Generative Grammar, Vol. 58 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York 47-66
22. Lehiste I., and Danforth D. Foneettisten vihjeiden hierarkia viron kvantiteetin havaitsemisessa. Virittäjä 4 (1977) 404-411
23. Liiv, G. (1961). Eesti keele kolme vältusastme vokaalide kestus ja meloodiatüübid. Keel ja Kirjandus, 7-8, 412-424, 480-490.
24. Lippus, P., Pajusalu, K., & Allik, J. (2007). The tonal component in perception of the Estonian quantity. In Trouvain, J., & Barry, W. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences: 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6-10 August 2007 (pp. 1049-1052).
25. Lippus, P., & Pajusalu, K. (in press). Regional variation in the perception of Estonian quantity. In M. Vainio, R. Aulanko, & O. Aaltonen (Eds.), Nordic prosody. Proceedings of the Xth conference, Helsinki.
26. McAllister R. Strategies for realization of L2-categories. English /s/-/z/. In: Bohn O.-S., and Munro M.J. (Eds). Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, Language Learning and Language Teaching, Vol. 17 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia 153-166
27. Meister E., Meister L., and Werner S. Microdurational variations and perception of vowel quality. In: O'Dell M., and Nieminen T. (Eds). Fonetiikan päivät 2008, Tampere Studies in Language, Translation and Culture, Series B 3 (2008), Tampere University Press, Tampere 157-165
28. Pajusalu, K. (1994). Kuidas soomlased õpivad kuulma eesti välteid. In K. Pajusalu, & V. Yli-Vakkuri (Eds.), Lähivertailuja 7. Publications of the Department of Finnish and General Linguistics of the Univesity of Turku, Vol. 44, Turku (pp. 75-88).
29. Remmel, M. (1975). The phonetic scope of Estonian: Some specifications. Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R. Institute of Language and Literature. Preprint KKI-5, Tallinn.
30. Suomi K., Toivanen J., and Ylitalo R. Finnish sound structure. Phonetics, phonology, phonotactics and prosody, Studia Humaniora Ouluensia 9 (2008), University Of Oulu, Oulu
31. Traunmüller H., and Krull D. The effect of local speaking rate on the perception of quantity in Estonian. Phonetica 60 (2003) 187-207