Semantic tags for interoperable construction workflow

Proceedings of the 2009 ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering

Volumn 346, Issue , 2009, Pages 623-632

  Mutis, Ivan ^a   Issa, Raja R A ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; CONSTRUCTION WORKFLOW; DIFFERENT SCALE; DYNAMIC INFORMATION; GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS; INTEGRATING INFORMATION; RESOURCE CONSTRAINT; SEMANTIC APPROACH; SEMANTIC TAGS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; UNIQUE FEATURES; WORK-FLOWS;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; METADATA; SEMANTICS; STANDARDIZATION;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 70350155329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/41052(346)62     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Anumba, C. J., Ugwu, O. O., and Ren, Z. (2005). "Introduction "Agents and multi-agent systems in construction C. J. Anumba, O. O. Ugwu, and Z. Ren, eds., Taylor & Francis, New York.
2. Bakis, N., Aouad, G., and Kagioglou, M. (2007). "Towards distributed product data sharing environments - Progress so far and future challenges." Automation in Construction, 16(5), 586-595.
3. Barresi, S., Rezgui, Y., Lima, C., and Meziane, F. (2008). "Semantic resources integration and interoperability in the construction domain" Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Y. Manolopoulos, J. Filipe, P. Constantopoulos, and J. Cordeiro, eds., Springer, Berlin
4. Block, N. (2006). "Semantics, conceptual role." The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London, UK, 10.
5. Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. (2000). "Models of core/periphery structures." Social Networks, 21(4), 375-395.
6. Brickley, D., and Guha, R. V. (2004). "RDF Vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema." W3C Recomendation.
7. C. Lima, C., Ferreira-da-Silva, C., and Le Duc, A. Z. (2005). "A framework to support interoperability among semantic resources." CSTB, Centre Scientifique et Technique du Batiment.
8. Chandler, D. (2002). Semiotics: the basics, Routledge, New York, NY.
9. Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, signs, and meanings: a basic textbook in semiotics and communication theory, Canadian Scholars' Inc., Toronto, Canada.
10. Eastman, C. M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., and Liston, K. (2008). BIM handbook: a guide to building information modelling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
11. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
12. Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
13. Freeman, L. C. (2000). "Visualizing social networks." University of California, Irvine.
14. Granovetter, M. S. (1982). "The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited." Sage focus editions P. V. Marsden and N. Lin, eds., Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 319.
15. Grilo, A., Jardim-Goncalves, R., and Steiger-Garcao, A." Shifting the construction interoperability paradigm, in the advent of service oriented and model driven architectures." CIB W78 22nd Conference on Information Technology in Construction.
16. Guarino, N. (1995). "Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation." International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 43(5), 625-640.
17. Howie, C. T., Law, K. H., and Kunz, J. C. (2000). "A model for software interoperation in engineering enterprise integration." 61, CIFE - Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University.
18. IAI. (2008). "Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)." ifc2X, ed., International Alliance for Interoperability, International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI).
19. Kadushin, C. (2004). "Introduction to Social Network Theory." Draft - Chapter.
20. Lazega, E., and Pattison, P. E. (1999). "Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study." Social Networks, 21(1), 67-90.
21. Mutis, I. (2007). "Conceptual Framework For Interpretation of construction domain concept representations," Doctor of Philosophy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
22. Mutis, I., and Issa, R. (2007). "Conceptual role semantics for interpretation of construction industry concepts." ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, CMU. Pittsburgh, PA, 8.
23. Mutis, I., and Issa, R. (2007). "Missing fundamental stratum of the current forms of the representation of concepts in construction" 24th W78 Conference Maribor 2007, 5th ITCEDU Workshop, and 14th EG-ICE Workshop, Maribor, Slovenia, 13.
24. Mutis, I., and Issa, R. (2008a). "Semiotic proposition for understanding semantics within construction documents." Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(S 1), 192-198.
25. Mutis, I., and Issa, R. (2008b). "The interoperability act for encompassing semantics from construction documents." CIB-W78 25th. International Conference on IT in Construction. Santiago, Chile. 447-445.
26. Mutis, I. A., Issa, R. R. A., and Flood, I. (2005). "A conceptual framework for mapping data representations in the AEC domain." Construction Research Congress, San Diego, CA, 572-577.
27. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, Mass.
28. Peirce, C. S. (1991). "Contributions in semiotics." Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotics, J. Hoopes, ed., University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
29. Pierce, C., and Hoopes, J. (1991). "Contributions in semiotics." Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotics, J. Hoopes, ed., University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
30. Sowa, J. F. (1999). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations, Brooks Cole Publishing Co, Pacific Grove, CA.
31. Sowa, J. F. (2006). "Worlds, models, and descriptions." Studia Logica, 84(2), 323-360.
32. Taylor, J., and Levitt, R. (2004). "Inter-organizational knowledge flow and innovation diffusion in project-based industries", 86, CIFE - Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University.