The mean, the median, and the St. Petersburg paradox

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 256-272

  Hayden, Benjamin Y ^a,b   Platt, Michael L ^a,b,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Center for Cognitive Neuroscience   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expectation heuristic; Heuristics; Median heuristic; Risk; Risk aversion; St. petersburg paradox

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350155177     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arrow, K. J. (1951). Alternative approaches to the theory of choice in risk-taking situations. Econometrica, 19, 404-437.
2. Aumann, R. J. (1977). The St. Petersburg paradox: A discussion of some recent comments. Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 443-445.
3. Baron, J. (1998). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bateson, M., & Kacelnik, A. (1997) Starlings preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food. Animal Behavior, 53, 1129-1142.
5. Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M.H., & Marschak J. (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
6. Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis (Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk). Comentarii Acad. Scient. Petropolis (translated in Econometrica), 5 (22), 23-36.
7. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2005). Back to the St. Petersburg paradox? Management Science, 51, 677-678.
8. Blyth, C. R. (1972). Some probability paradoxes in choice from among random alternatives. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 366-373.
9. Bottom, W. P., Bontempo, R. N., & Holtgrave, D. R. (1989). Experts, novices, and the St. Petersburg paradox: is one solution enough? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 139-147.
10. Broome, J. (1995). The Two-Envelope Paradox. Analysis, 55, 6-11.
11. Camerer, C. (2005). Three cheers-psychological, theoretical, empirical-for loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 129-133.
12. Ceasar, A. J. (1984). A Monte Carlo simulation related to the St. Petersburg paradox. The College Mathematics Journal, 15, 339-342.
13. Cox, J. C., Sadiraj, V., & Vogt, B. On the empirical relevance of St. Petersburg Lotteries. Working paper, retrieved from http://expecon.gsu.edu/ jccox/papers.jsp on Mar 5, 2009.
14. Datson, L. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. De Morgan, A. (1838). Essay on probabilities. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
16. Dutka, J. (1988). On the St. Petersburg paradox. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 39, 13-39.
17. Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 279-304.
18. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), The adaptive toolbox, pp. 2-3. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Gigerenzer, G., Swiljtink, Z., Porter, T., Datson, L., Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1990). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hacking, I. (1980). Strange expectations. Philosophy of Science, 47, 562-567.
21. Hinners-Tobraegel, L. (2003). The St. Petersburg paradox. Paper presented at the EFITA, Debrecen, Hungary.
22. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
24. Keynes, J. (1921). A treatise on probability. Barnes and Noble Publishing.
25. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Kroll, E. B. & Vogt, B. The St. Petersburg paradox despite risk-seeking preferences: an experimental study. FEMM working paper No. 4, January 2009.
27. Liebovitch, L. S., & Scheurle, D. (2000). Two lessons from fractals and chaos. Complexity, 5, 34-43.
28. Lopes, L. L. (1981). Decision making in the short run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 377-385.
29. Lopes, L. L. (1996). When time is of the essence: averaging, aspiration, and the short run. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 179-189.
30. Martin, R. M. (2008, Jun 16 2008). The St. Petersbug paradox. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Retrieved Jun 16 2008, 2008, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paradox-stpetersburg.
31. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Menger, K. (1934). Das Unsicherheitsmoment in der Wertlehere. Z. Nationaloeken, 51, 459-485.
33. Montgomery, H., & Adelbratt, T. (1982). Gambling decisions and information about expected value. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 39-57.
34. Morgenstern, O. (1976). The collaboration between Oskar Morgenstern and John von Neumann on the theory of games. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 805- 816.
35. Moritz, R. E. (1923). Some curious fallacies in the study of probability. The American Mathematical Monthly, 30, 58-65.
36. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Real, L. A. (1996). Paradox, performance and the architecture of decision-making in animals. American Zoologist, 36, 518-529.
38. Rieger, M. O. and Wang, M. Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox. Economic Theory 28(3), 665-679.
39. Rivero, J. C., Holtgrave, D. R., Bontempo, R. N., & Bottom, W. P. The St. Petersburg paradox: Data at last. Commentary, 8(3-4), 46-51.
40. Samuelson, P. A. (1960). The St. Petersburg paradox as a divergent double limit. International Economic Review, 1, 31-37.
41. Samuelson, P. A. (1963). Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia, 98, 108-113.
42. Samuelson, P. A. (1977). St. Petersburg paradoxes: Defanged, dissected, and historically described. Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 24-55.
43. Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York, New York: Wiley.
44. Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1982). The Expected Utility Model: its variants, purposes, evidence, and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 529-563.
45. Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Hershey, J. C. (1996). Maximizing your chance of winning: the long and short of it revisited. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 194-200.
46. Schwitzgebel, E., & Dever, J. (2008). The Two Envelope paradox and using variables within the expectation formulaa. Sorites, 20(135-140).
47. Sennetti, J. T. (1976). On Bernoulli, Sharpe, financial risk and the St. Petersburg paradox. The Journal of Finance, 31, 960-962.
48. Shapley, L. S. (1977). The St. Petersburg paradox: a con game? Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 439-442.
49. Sharpe, W. P. (1970). Portfolio theory and capital markets. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Treisman, M. (1983). A solution to the St. Petersburg paradox. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 36, 224-227.
51. Tversky, A., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1983). Risk: the long and the short. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 713-717.
52. Vickrey, W. (1960). Utility, strategy, and social decision rules. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74, 507- 535.
53. Vivian, R. W. (2003). Solving Daniel Bernoulli's St. Petersburg paradox: The paradox which is not and never was. South African Journal of Economic and Management Science, 6(2) 331-345.
54. Von Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Weaver, W. (1963). Lady luck. New York: Anchor Books.
56. Wedell, D. H., & Boeckenholt, U. (1994). Contemplating single vs multiple encounters of a risky prospect. The American Journal of Psychology, 107, 499-518.
57. Weirich, P. (1984). The St. Petersburg gamble and risk. Theory and Decision, 17, 193-202.
58. Weissstein, E. W. (2008). Statistical median. MathWorld, 2008, from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StatisticalMedian.html.