Comparison of a novel confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy algorithm with optical coherence tomography in measurement of macular thickness and volume

Retina

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1328-1334

  Lee, Byung Ro ^a,b   Bartsch, Dirk Uwe ^a   Kozak, Igor ^a   Cheng, Lingyun ^a   Freeman, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Heidelberg retinal tomography; Macular thickness; Macular volume; Optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; THICKNESS;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASERS; MACULA LUTEA; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MACULAR EDEMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 70350146603     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181ac7d30     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Massin P, Girach A, Erginary A, et al. Optical coherence tomography: a key to the future management of patients with diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84: 466-474.
2. Polito A, Borrello MD, Isola M, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123: 1330-1337.
3. Costa RA, Calucci D, Skaf M, et al. Optical coherence tomography 3: automatic delineation of the outer neural retinal boundary and its influence on retinal thickness measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2399-2406.
4. Degenring RF, Schmoneit I, Kamppeter B, et al. Optical coherence tomography and confocal laser tomography for assessment of macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:354-361.
5. Massin P, Vicaut E, Haouchine B, et al. Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1135-1142.
6. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1716-1724.
7. Chan A, Duker JS, Ko TH. Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:193-198 (Pubitemid 43247068)
8. Bartsch D-UG, Gong X, Ly C, et al. Optical coherence tomography: interpretation artifacts and new algorithm. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M, eds. Medical Imaging 2004: Image Processing. Proceedings of SPIE. Vol 5370. Bellingham, WA: SPIE; 2004:2140-2151.
9. Sadda SR, Wu Z, Walsh AC, et al. Errors in retinal thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:285-293.
10. Ray R, Stinnett SS, Jaffe GJ. Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:18-29.
11. Leung CK, Chan WM, Chong KK, et al. Alignment artifacts in optical coherence tomography analyzed images. Ophthalmology 2007;114:263-270.
12. de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, et al. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2003;28:2067-2069.
13. Kruse FE, Burk ROW, Volcker HE, et al. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. Ophthalmology 1989;96:1320-1324.
14. Bartsch DU, Intaglietta M, Bille JF, et al. Confocal laser tomographic analysis of the retina in eyes with macular hole formation and other macular diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108:277-287.
15. Bartsch D, Freeman WR. Axial intensity distribution analysis of the human retina with a confocal scanning laser tomography. Exp Eye Res 1994;58:161-173.
16. Hudson C, Flanagan JG, Turner GS, et al. Scanning laser tomography Z profile signal width as an objective index of macular retinal thickening. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:121-130.
17. Zambarakji HJ, Evans JE, Amoaku WM, et al. Reproducibility of volumetric measurements of normal maculae with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:884-891.
18. Zambarakji HJ, Amoaku WM, Vernon SA. Volumetric analysis of early macular edema with the Heidelberg retina tomography in diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1998;105: 1051-1059
19. Zambarakji HJ, Vernon SA, Spencer AF, et al. Reproducibility of volumetric measurements in diabetic patients with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Doc Ophthalmol 1999;97:349-360.
20. Ang A, Tong L, Vernon SA. Improvement of reproducibility of macular volume measurements using the Heidelberg retinal tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:1194-1197.
21. Tong L, Ang A, Vernon SA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a new scoring system for diabetic macular oedema detection using confocal laser imaging system. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:34-39.
22. Bartsch DG, Aurora A, Rodanant N, et al. Volumetric analysis of macular edema by scanning laser tomography in immune recovery uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1246-1251.
23. Bartsch DU, Freeman WR. Laser-tissue interaction and artifacts in confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and tomography. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1993;17:459-467.
24. Hudson C, Flanagan JG, Turner GS, et al. Correlation of a scanning laser derived oedema index and visual function following grid laser treatment for diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:455-461.
25. Guan K, Hudson C, Flanagan JG. Comparison of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Retinal Thickness Analyzer in the assessment of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:610-616.
26. Pallikaris A, Skondra D, Tsilimbaris M. Intraobserver repeatability of macula measurements by confocal scanning laser tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:624-630.
27. Kisilevsky M, Hudson C, Flanagan JG, et al. Agreement of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 2 macular edema module with fundus biomicroscopy in diabetic maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:337-342.
28. Willis B, Roysam B, Turner JN, et al. Iterative, constrained 3-D image reconstruction of transmitted light bright-field micrographs based on maximum likelihood estimation. J Microsc 1993;169:347-361.
29. Sedarat F, Lin E, Moore ED, et al. Deconvolution of confocal images of dihydropyridine and ryanodine receptors in developing cardiomyocytes. J Appl Physiol 2004;97:1098-1103.
30. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. ETDRS report number 7: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. Ophthalmology 1991;98:741-756.
31. Krebs I, Binder S, Stolba U, et al. Optical coherence tomography guided retreatment of photodynamic therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1184-1187.
32. Garcia-Layana A, Salinas-Alaman A, Maldonado MJ, et al. Optical coherence tomography to monitor photodynamic therapy in pathological myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:555-558.
33. Salinas-Alaman A, Garcia-Layana A, Maldonado MJ, et al. Using optical coherence tomography to monitor photodynamic therapy in age related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:23-28.
34. Moere AV, Sandhu SS, Talks TJ. Correlation of optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescence angiography following photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascular membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:304-306.