Ultrasound machine comparison an evaluation of ergonomic design, data management, ease of use, and image quality

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 349-356

  Wynd, Kimberly P ^a   Smith, Hugh M ^a   Jacob, Adam K ^a   Torsher, Laurence C ^a   Kopp, Sandra L ^a   Hebl, James R ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COST; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 70350141059     PISSN: 10987339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ac9e5b     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Marhofer P, Chan VW. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current concepts and future trends. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1265-1269.
2. Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher J, Beach ML, Antonakakis JG, Sites VR, et al. Regional anesthesia meets ultrasound: a specialty in transition. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:456-466.
3. Sites BD, Brull R. Ultrasound guidance in peripheral regional anesthesia: philosophy, evidence-based medicine, and techniques. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:630-639.
4. Institute of Medicine. Committee for Evaluating Medical Technologies in Clinical Use, Division of Health Sciences Policy. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1985.