Cell phones and choice architecture

Injury Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 289-290

  Johnston, Brian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CAR DRIVING; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MOBILE PHONE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CELLULAR PHONE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS;

EID: 70350134433     PISSN: 13538047     EISSN: 14755785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ip.2009.024455     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Anon. Driven to distraction. New York Times. http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/technology/series/driven_to_distraction/index.html (accessed 31 Jul 2009).
2. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-91
3. Richtel M. US withheld data on risks of distracted driving. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/
4. Hanowski RJ, Olson RL, Hickman JS, et al. Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations. In: First International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg, Sweden, 28-29 September 2009. In press.
5. McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State's law on drivers' handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev 2004;10:11-15
6. Anon. Key 2 Safe Driving. http://www.key2safedriving.net/ (accessed 31 Jul 2009).
7. Anon. Aegis Mobility. http://www.aegismobility.com/(accessed 31 Jul 2009).
8. Thaler RH, Sunstein CS. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.