Entanglement monogamy and entanglement evolution in multipartite systems

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Bai, Yan Kui ^a,b   Ye, Ming Yong ^a,c   Wang, Z D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HEBEI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c FUJIAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE SYSTEMS; ENTANGLEMENT DISTRIBUTION; MULTIPARTITE SYSTEMS; SUDDEN DEATHS; TIME INTERVAL; TWO-CAVITY; TWO-QUBIT;

EID: 70350130816     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.044301     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
2. C. H. Bennett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70. 1895
3. C. H. Bennett and D. P. Divincenzo, Nature (London) 404, 247 (2000). 10.1038/35005001
4. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188
5. M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 1 (2007)
6. L. Amico, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008) 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517
7. R. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009). 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
8. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 2245
9. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306
10. T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.220503
11. C.-S. Yu and H.-S. Song, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042331 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042331
12. T. Hiroshima, G. Adesso, and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050503 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.050503
13. Y.-C. Ou and H. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 75, 062308 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75. 062308
14. J.-H. Huang and S.-Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012325 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012325
15. D. P. Chi, J. Math. Phys. 49, 112102 (2008). 10.1063/1.3020685
16. J. S. Kim, A. Das, and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A 79, 012329 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.012329
17. K. Życzkowski, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012101 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012101
18. T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140404 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.140404
19. T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140403 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.140403
20. M. P. Almeida, Science 316, 579 (2007). 10.1126/science.1139892
21. J. Laurat, K. S. Choi, H. Deng, C. W. Chou, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 180504 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.180504
22. T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Science 323, 598 (2009). 10.1126/science.1167343
23. C. E. López, G. Romero, F. Lastra, E. Solano, and J. C. Retamal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080503 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.080503
24. E. Santos and M. Ferrero, Phys. Rev. A 62, 024101 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.024101
25. T. J. Osborne, Phys. Rev. A 72, 022309 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.022309
26. Y.-K. Bai, D. Yang, and Z. D. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 76, 022336 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.022336
27. Y.-K. Bai and Z. D. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032313 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032313
28. The counterexample for rank-3 case is the quantum state |Ψ□ A1 A1′ A2 A3 = (2 | 0010 □ +2 | 0101 □ + | 1000 □ + | 1011 □) /6, for which the strong monogamy relation in Eq. does not hold and has the form 4/3<8/9+8/9. The counterexample for rank-4 case is the tensor product of two Bell states |Φ□ A1 A1′ A2 A2′ = | ψ+ □ A1 A2 □ | ψ+ □ A1′ A2′, for which neither the strong nor the weak monogamy relation is satisfied.
29. A. R. R. Carvalho, F. Mintert, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230501 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.230501
30. R. Lohmayer, A. Osterloh, J. Siewert, and A. Uhlmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 260502 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.260502
31. Y.-K. Bai, M.-Y. Ye, and Z. D. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 78, 062325 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062325
32. S. Wu and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012308 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.63. 012308
33. J. Zhou, C. Wu, M. Zhu, and H. Guo, e-print arXiv:0904.1658.