The Victor Diamond Mine environmental assessment process: A critical First Nation perspective

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 205-215

  Whitelaw, Graham S ^a   McCarthy, Daniel D ^b   Tsuji, Leonard J S ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attawapiskat First Nation; Environmental assessment; Fort Albany First Nation; Land use planning; Public consultation; Scoping

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; LAND USE PLANNING; MINING; REGIONAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER;

ATTAWAPISKAT; CANADA; JAMES BAY; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 70350130613     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/146155109X465931     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abelson, J, P-G Forest, J Eyles, P Smith, E Martin, F-P Gauvin 2003. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57(2), 239-251.
2. Armitage, D 2005. Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(3), 239-258.
3. AMEC 2004a. Victor Diamond Mine Comprehensive Study Environmental Assessment Main Report. Mississauga, Ontario: DeBeers Canada and AMEC Consulting.
4. AMEC 2004b. Component TEK study: Victor Site alternative transportation corridor. TC261521. St. John's, Newfoundland: AMEC Earth & Environmental. Available at urlhttp://www.debeerscanada.com/files_2/pdf_documents/victor_ea_2004/05_sub-folder/Appendix_G_Component-TEK-Study/Component_TEK_Study.pdf, (last accessed 8 March 2009).
5. Attawapiskat FN and DeBeers Canada Inc. 2005. Impact and Benefit Agreement in Respect of the Victor Diamond Mine. Toronto, Ontario: November 4, 2005.
6. Barabas, J 2004. How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 687-701.
7. Barnes, S M and R J Wallin 2007. After the environmental assessment - A tale of development on Attawapiskat traditional territory. Presentation to the University College of the North's Kiskisiwin: Remembering stories and histories conference, Thompson, Manitoba, May 12-14, 2008.
8. Beckmann, L 1994. Marine conservation in the Canadian Arctic. Northern Perspectives, 22, 33-39.
9. Bond, A, J Palerm and P Haigh 2004. Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects: a case study analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 617-641.
10. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2005. Victor Diamond Project Comprehensive Study Report. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Available at urlhttp://www.ceaa.gc.ca/010/0003/0060/report_e.htm/, last accessed 15 October 2008.
11. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2009. Basics of Environmental Assessment. Available at urlhttp://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/013/001/0003/appropriate_e.htm, last accessed April 27, 2009.
12. Canadian Legal Information Institute, 2009. Migratory Bird Sanctuary Regulation, C.R.C. c1036. Available at urlhttp://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/regu/crc-c-1036/latest/crc-c-1036.html, last accessed 27 April 2009.
13. Connelly, R G 2004. Letter from R.G. Connelly, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency to Grand Chief Stan Beardy, Nishnawbe Aski Nation regarding the comprehensive environmental assessment process dated 12 March 2004. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
14. DeBeers Canada 2004. Letter from Jeremy Wyeth, Vice President, Victor Diamond Project to Paul Schafer, Senior Program Officer, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency re: Response to Draft Guidelines for the Conduct of a Comprehensive Study and the preparation of a Draft Comprehensive Study report (CSR) - Victor Diamond Project, January 20, 2004.
15. DeBeers Canada 2008. Victor Project: Fact Sheet. Toronto, Ontario: De Beers Canada. Available at urlwww.debeerscanada.com/files_2/victor_project/factsheet.html, last accessed 28 September 2008.
16. Doelle, M A, and Sinclair J 2006. Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability. Environmental Impact AssessmentReview, 26(2), 185-205.
17. Feit, H 2004. Hunting and the Quest for Power: The James Bay Cree and Whiteman Development. In Native Peoples: The Canadian Experience, eds. R B Morrison and C R Wilson. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 101-128.
18. Fitzpatrick, P, A J Sinclair 2003. Learning through public involvement in environmental assessment hearings. Journal of Environmental Management, 67(2), 61-174.
19. Fort Albany First Nation/Kahsechewan First Nation and DeBeers Canada Inc., 2008. Victor Diamond Mine: The Impacts and Benefits Agreement for the Fort Albany First Nation and Kashechewan First Nation, Plain language Impact Benefit Agreement Document, Fort Albany, Kashechewan and Toronto, Ontario: Fort Albany First Nation/Kashechewan First Nation and DeBeers Canada Inc.
20. Gibson, R B 2002. From Wreck Cove to Voisey's Bay: The evolution of federal environmental assessment in Canada, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(3), 151-159.
21. Government of Canada 2003. Victor Diamond Project: Draft Guidelines for the Conduct of a Comprehensive Study and the Preparation of a Draft Comprehensive Study Report. Ottawa, Ontario: Natural Resources Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Indian Northern Affairs.
22. Government of Canada 2004. Victor Diamond Project DeBeers Canada Exploration Inc.: Guidelines for the Conduct of a Comprehensive Study and the Preparation of a Draft Compre hensive Study Report. Government of Canada, Ottawa, On tario: Natural Resources Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Indian Northern Affairs.
23. Government of Canada 2005. Environment Minister announces decision on the Victor Diamond Mine Project on Northern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario: Department of Environment. Avail able at urlhttp://news.gc.ca/cfmx/view/en/index.jsp?articleid=165609, last accessed 15 October 2008.
24. Hall, T 2004a. Letter from Attawapiskat First Nation Chief Hall to Paul Schafer, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 12 February 2004, regarding the Draft Guidelines for the Victor Diamond Mine comprehensive environmental assessment. Attawapiskat, Ontario: Attawapiskat First Nation.
25. Hall, T 2004b. Letter from Attawapiskat First Nation Chief Hall to Grand Chief Stan Beardy, Nishnawbe Aski Nation, April 6, 2004 regarding the Victor Diamond Project Environmental Assessment Process. Attawapiskat, Ontario: Attawapiskat Fist Nation.
26. Huntington, H P 1998. Observations on the utility of the semidirective interview for documenting traditional ecological knowledge. Arctic, 51(3), 237-242.
27. IER 2005. Review of the DeBeers Environmental Assessment Comprehensive Study Report - Final Document - Victor Diamond Project. Toronto, Ontario: Conducted for Mushkegowuk Tribal Council.
28. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada 2007. Northern Development Ministers' Forum Highlights, Ottawa, Ontario, November 22-23, 2007, available at urlhttp: //www.scics.gc.ca/cinfo07/830928004_e.html>., last accessed 03 May 2009
29. Intercontinental Cry 2009. Attawapiskat holding winter blockade against DeBeers, February 25, 2009, available at http://intercontinentalcry.org/attawapiskat-holding-winter-blockade-against-de-beers/, last accessed 03 May 2009.
30. Kennedy, A J and W A Ross 1992. An approach to integrate impact scoping with environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management, 16(4), 475-484.
31. Kooses, D 2004. Letter from D Kooses, Deputy Grand Chief, Nishnawbe Aski Nation, to Honourable Andy Mitchell, Minister Indian Affairs and Northern Development, March 16, 2004, regarding concerns about the Victor Diamond mine environ mental assessment process. Thunder Bay Ontario: Nishnawbe Aski Nation.
32. Lagacé, D 2003. Letter from D Legace, Natural Resources Canada to M Cunningham, DeBeers Canada, 19 September 2003, regarding scoping of the Victor Diamond Environmental Assessment. Ottawa, Ontario: Natural Resources Canada.
33. Lagacé D 2004. Letter from D Legace, Natural Resources Canada to J Wyeth, DeBeers Canada, November 2, 2004 regarding socio-economic information requirements under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act for the Victor Diamond Mine environmental assessment. Ottawa, Ontario: Natural Resources Canada.
34. Louttit, S 2004. Letter from S Louttit, Grand Chief, Mushkegowuk Tribal Council to Honourable. J Efford, Minister of Natural Resources, Honourable S Dion, Minister of Environment, Honourable A Scott, Minister of Indian Affairs and Honourable G Regan, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, November 18, 2004 regarding Victor Diamond Project socio economic scoping. Timmins, Ontario: Mushkegowuk Tribal Council.
35. Minkin, D P 2008. Cultural preservation and self-determination through land use planning: A framework for the Fort Albany First Nation, Kingston, Ontario: A Master of Urban and Regional Planning Thesis submitted to the School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University.
36. Moose Factory First Nation and DeBeers Canada Inc. 2007. Impact Benefit Agreement in Respect of the Victor Diamond Mine between Moose Cree First Nation and DeBeers Canada Inc. Toronto, Ontario, September 17, 2007: Moose Factory First Nation and DeBeers Canada Inc.
37. Mulvihill, P R and D Baker 2001. Ambitious and restrictive scoping: case studies from northern Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(4), 363-384.
38. Mushkegowuk Council 2004. Letter from Job Mollins Koene, Lands and Resource Director, Mushkegowuk Council to Jonathan Fowler, DeBeers Canada re: Review of Victor Diamond Comprehensive Study of the Victor Diamond Mine, April 27, 2004.
39. Mushkegowuk Council 2005. Mushkegowuk Council Comments on Victor Diamond Project Comprehensive Study Report, Final Document - June 2005 (comments submitted to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency July 11, 2005). Timmins, Ontario: Mushkegowuk Council.
40. rd Annual Assembly Resolution No. 2008-11-29 Resource Development Activities in Mushkegowuk First Nations, Resolution No. 2008- 11-13 Territorial Mapping and land Use Planning and Resolution No. 2008-11-25 Mining Activities in Mushkegowuk First Nation homelands, Moose Factory, Ontario, November 14, 2008.
41. Mushkegowuk Council, 2009. The Rupert's Land Protection Pledge Lawsuit: Questions and Answers. Timmins, Ontario:Mushkegowuk Council. Available at urlhttp://www. mushkegowuk.ca/rupertsland.html>, last accessed 27 April 2009.
42. Natural Resources Canada 2006. Canadian Diamonds - Mining our way toward a responsible future. Ottawa, Ontario: Natural Resources Canada. Available at urlhttp://www.nrcan.gc.ca/elements/issues/06/diamonds_e.html, last accessed 21 December 2006.
43. Nishnawbe Aski Nation 2009. History, Available at urlhttp://www.nan.on.ca/article/history-116.asp last accessed 03 May 2009.
44. Office of the Premier 2008. Protecting A Northern Boreal Region One-and-a-half times the size of thje Maritimes, Toronto, Ontario: Available at urlwww.premier.gov.on.ca/news/Products.asp?ProductID=2358, last accessed 03 May 2009.
45. OgilvyRenault, 2007. Duty to consult and accommodate Aboriginal Peoples: Impact on the Mining Industry in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Available at urlwww.ogilvyrenault.com/en/resourcecentre_980.htm, last accessed 03 May 2009.
46. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 2005. Letter from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, to Anna Baggio, CPAWS- Wildlands League, regarding Victor Diamond Project: Class Environmental Assessment for MNR Resource Stewardship and facilities Development Projects. Cochrane, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
47. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 2009. Direction for Ontario's Far North, presentation to Omushkego Regional Land Use Planning Workshop, January 19, 2009, Timmins, Ontario, Canada.
48. Ontario Parks 2009. Polar Bear. Toronto, Ontario: Available at urlhttp://www.ontarioparks.com/english/pola.html, last accessed 03 May 2009.
49. Ontario Power Generation 2009. Decew Falls II, Toronto, Ontario: Available at urlhttp://www.opg.com/power/hydro/niagara_ plant_group/decew2.asp>, last accessed 03 May 2009.
50. Poncelet, E C 2001. Personal transformation in multistakeholder environmental partnerships. Policy Sciences, 34(3-4), December, 273-301.
51. Rutherford, S and K Campbell 2004. Time well spent? a survey of public participation in federal EA panels, Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 15(1), 71-82.
52. Salisbury, R F 1986. A Homeland for the Cree: Regional development in James Bay 1971-1981. Montreal Quebec: McGillQueen's University Press.
53. SNC-Lavalin Engineers and Constructors 2005. Victor Project Power Supply Class EA, Toronto, Ontario: De Beers Canada, Five Nation Energy Inc. and Hydro One. Available at urlwww.debeerscanada.com/files_2/victor_project/ victor_ea-report-2005-section-04-index.html>, last accessed 15 October, 2008.
54. Sosa I and K Keenan, 2001. Impact Benefit Agreements Between Aboriginal Communities and Mining Companies: Their use in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Mining Council of BC, Canadian Environmental Law Association and Cooper Acción: AcciónSolidaria para el Desarrollo, Available at urlwww.cela.ca/files/uploads/IBAeng.pdf, last accessed 03 May 2009.
55. Stevenson, M G 1996. Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic 49(3): 278-291.
56. Stewart, J M P and A J Sinclair 2007. Meaningful public participation in environmental assessment: perspectives from Canadian participants, proponents, and government. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9(2),161-183.
57. Sumner, J 2005. Letter from J. Sumner, Executive Director, Wildlands League to Ontario Minister of Environment, Honourable L.C. Broten, July 28, 2005, regarding the Victor Diamond Mine Power Supply, Toronto, Ontario: Wildlands League.
58. Tsuji, L J S and E. Nieboer 1999. A question of sustainability in Cree harvesting practices: The seasons, technological and cultural changes in the western James Bay region of northern Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 19(1), 169-192.
59. Tsuji, L J S, B C Wainman, I D Martin, J-P Webster, C Sutherland and E Nieboer 2006. Abandoned Mid-Canada Radar line sites in Western James Bay Region of Northern Ontario, Canada: A source of organochlorines for First Nation people? Science of the Total Environment, 370(2-3), 452-466.
60. Tsuji, L J S, H Manson, B C Wainman, et al. 2007. Identifying potential routes of contaminant exposure in the traditional territory of the Ouje-Bougoumou Cree: the use of traditional environmental knowledge and a Geographic Information System. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127(1-3):293-306.
61. Webler, T, S Tuler 2000. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: theoretical reflections from a case study. Social and Environmental Research Institute, 32(5), 566-595.
62. Webler, T, S Tuler, R Krueger 2001. What is good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27(3), 435-450.
63. Wood, G, J Glasson and J Becker 2006. EIA scoping in England and Wales: Practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1),221-241.
64. Woodland Heritage Services 2004. Stage one and two project report archeological/cultural heritage potential site assessment for southwest alternative winter road right of ways from Hearst northerly approximately 320 km to the Victor diamond project site. Ontario, Canada: Woodland Heritage Services. Available at url http://www.debeerscanada.com/files_2/pdf_documents/victor_ea_2004/05_sub-folder/Appendix_H_SWAWR-Heritage-Res-Study/Cultural_Heritage_Resources_Rpt.pdf, last accessed 8 Feb 2008.
65. Wyeth, J 2003. Letter from J Wyeth, DeBeers Canada, to T Hogarth, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, February, 20, 2003 regarding environmental assessment scoping - DeBeers Victor Diamond project - Formal request for a broadly scoped comprehensive study level environmental assessment, pursuant to CEAA. Toronto, Ontario: De Beers Canada Inc.