A new approach to characterising aspheric surfaces

Precision Engineering

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 171-179

  Sun, W ^a   McBride, J W ^a   Hill, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aspheric surfaces; Fitting algorithm; Nonlinear least squares

Indexed keywords

ASPHERIC SURFACES; DESIGN EQUATION; DESIGN PARAMETERS; DESIGN VALUE; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; FITTING ALGORITHM; FITTING METHOD; NEW APPROACHES; NONLINEAR LEAST-SQUARES; POLYNOMIAL MODELS; SECOND ORDERS; SURFACE MODELS; SURFACE PARAMETER; THREE DIMENSIONAL SPACE;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ASPHERICS;

EID: 70350120055     PISSN: 01416359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Douthwaite W.A. Contact lens optics and lens design (1995), Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
2. Heynacher E. Aspheric optics-how they are made and why they are needed. Physics in Technology 10 (1979) 124-131
3. Mcister D. Aspheric lenses: optics and applications. Lens Talk 26 25 (1998)
4. Stout K.J. Development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions (2000), Penton Press, UK
5. Aceves-Campos H. Profile identification of aspheric lenses. Applied Optics 37 34 (1998) 8149-8150
6. Zhang Z. Parameter estimation techniques: a tutorial with application to conic fitting. Image and Vision Computing 15 1 (1997) 59-76
7. Gugsa S., and Davies A. Monte Carlo analysis for the determination of the conic constant of an aspheric micro lens based on a scanning white light interferometric measurement. In: Hatheway Alson E. (Ed). Proceedings of the SPIE (2005) 92-102
8. Sun W. Precision measurement and characterisation of spherical and aspheric surfaces. University of Southampton. PhD Thesis; 2007. p. 149.
9. Sun W., Hill M., and McBride J.W. An investigation of the robustness of the nonlinear least-squares sphere fitting method to small segment angle surfaces. Precision Engineering 32 1 (2008) 55-62
10. Forbes AB. Robust circle and sphere fitting by least squares (DITC 153/89). NPL report; 1989.
11. Patel S., Alió J.L., and Pérez-Santonja J.J. A model to explain the difference between changes in refraction and central ocular surface power after laser in situ Keratomileusis. Journal of Refractive Surgery 16 (2000) 330-335
12. Hill M., Jung M., and McBride J.W. Separation of form from orientation in 3D measurements of aspheric surfaces with no datum. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 42 (2002) 457-466
13. Jung M. Assessment of curved, rotationally symmetric surfaces in three dimensions. University of Southampton. PhD Thesis; 1999. p. 131.
14. Jaccard J., Turrisi R., and Wan C.K. Interaction effects in multiple regression (1990), Sage Publications, Inc.
15. Berry W.D., and Feldman S. Multiple regression in practice (1985), Sage Publications, Inc.
16. Jaccard J., and Wan C.K. Lisrel approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression (1996), Sage Publications, Inc.
17. Daniel C., and Wood F.S. Fitting equations to data: computer analysis of multifactor data (1980), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18. Woodford C.H., and Phillips C. Numerical methods with worked examples (1997), Chapman & Hall
19. Dixon L.C.W., and Szego G.P. Towards global optimisation (1975), North-holland Publishing Company
20. Sourlier D., and Bucher A. Surface-independent, theoretically exact bestfit for arbitrary sculptured, complex, or standard geometries. Precision Engineering 17 2 (1995) 101-113