Low energy dart test for mechanical evaluation of ophthalmic materials

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 979-987

  Martínez, Antonio B ^b   Artús, Pau ^a   Dürsteler, Juan C ^a   Arencón, David ^b  

^a Indo Lens Group SL   (Spain)

^b Centre Català del Plàstic   (Spain)

Author keywords

CR 39; Low energy impact; Non conservative model; Ophthalmic; Polymer; Superfin

Indexed keywords

CR-39; LOW ENERGY IMPACT; NON-CONSERVATIVE MODEL; OPHTHALMIC; SUPERFIN;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ELASTIC MODULI; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENERGY DISSIPATORS; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

POLYMERS;

BIOMATERIAL; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY ABSORPTION; EVALUATION; LOW ENERGY DART TEST; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; LENSES; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OPTOMETRY; PLASTICS; POLYESTERS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 70350116167     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b2f7ae     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. International Organization for Standardization. Plastics-Determination of Puncture Impact Behaviour of Rigid Plastics-Part 2: Instrumented Puncture Test. ISO 6603-2; 2000. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2000.
2. Ward IM, Hadley DW. Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1933.
3. Williams JG. Fracture Mechanics of Polymers. Chichester: E. Horwood; 1984.
4. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ. Fracture Behaviour of Polymers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1983.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Test Standard 21 CFR 801.410(d)(2). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration; 2000.
6. Chou BR, Gupta A, Hovis JK. The effect of multiple antireflective coatings and center thickness on resistance of polycarbonate spectacle lenses to penetration by pointed missiles. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82: 964-969
7. Jime'nez O, Sullcahuaman JA, Sa'nchez-Soto M, Martínez AB. Low energy impact evaluation using non conservative models. Int J Sol Struct 2005;42:5758-5764
8. Artu's P, Dürsteler JC, Martínez AB. Low-energy dynamic indentation method for analysis of ophthalmic materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:49-53.
9. Timoshenko S, Goodier JN. Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1982.
10. Timoshenko SP, Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1969.
11. Nobre JP, Dias AM, Gras R. Resistance of a ductile steel surface to spherical normal impact indentation: use of a pendulum machine. Wear 1997;211:226-236
12. Southern E, Thomas AG. The impact of rigid spheres on rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 1972;16:1641-1651
13. Zukas JA, Greszczuk JB. Recent Advances in Impact Dynamics of Engineering Structures. Malabar, FL: Krieger Pub. Co.; 1992.
14. Vriend NM, Kren AP. Determination of the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric materials by the dynamic indentation method. Polym Test 2004;23:369-375
15. Rydin RW, Karbhari VM. Partitioning energy during low-velocity impact of rtm fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Impact Eng 1998; 21:773-789
16. Martínez AB, Sa'nchez-Soto M, Velasco JI, Maspoch ML, Santana OO, Gordillo A. Impact characterization of carbon fiber-epoxy laminate using a nonconservative model. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;97: 2256-2263
17. Sa'nchez-Soto M, Martínez AB, Santana OO, Gordillo A. On the application of damped model to the falling weight impact characterization of glass beads-polystyrene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2004; 93:1271-1284
18. Martinez AB, Agullo' J, Jime'nez O, Sullcahuaman JA, Sa'nchez-Soto M, Maspoch ML, Velasco JI, Santana OO, Gordillo A. Impacto de baja energía en composites de poliestireno. Gijo'n, Spain: Congreso Nacional de Materiales Compuestos; 2001.