Commentary: Virtual planning: Second life and the online studio

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 108-113

  Hollander, Justin B ^a   Thomas, David ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Pedagogy; Planning studio; Second Life; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350072642     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X09334142     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bugela, Michael J. 2007. Second thoughts on Second Life. The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 21.
2. de Freitas, S. 2007. Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee.
3. Dutton, Thomas A. 1987. Design and studio pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education 41 (1): 16-25.
4. Filene, Peter. 2005. The joy of teaching: A practical guide for new college instructors. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
5. Foster, Andrea L. 2007a. The death of a virtual campus. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 13.
6. Foster, Andrea L. 2007b. Virtual worlds as social-science labs: How one professor uses online games as petri dishes of human behavior. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 6.
7. Gaber, John. 2007. Simulating planning: SimCity as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27 (2): 113-21.
8. Gee, James Paul. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Greene, Sherwin. 1988. Making the studio experience work for part-time students. Journal of Planning Education and Research 8 (1): 9-11.
10. Gudmundsen, Jinny. 2006. Movement aims to get serious about games. USA Today, May 19.
11. Heumann, Leonard F., and Louis B. Wetmore. 1984. A partial history of planning workshops: The experience of ten schools from 1955 to 1984. Journal of Planning Education and Research 4 (2): 120-30.
12. Huizinga, Johan. 1955. Homo ludens; a study of the play-element in culture. Boston: Beacon.
13. Kelton, A.J. 2007. Second Life: Reaching into the virtual world for real-world learning. Research Bulletin, EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, CO.
14. Kirriemuir, J., and C.A. McFarlane. 2004. Literature review in games and learning (No. 8). Bristol, UK: Futurelab.
15. Lang, Jon. 1983. Teaching planning to city planning students: An argument for the studio/workshop approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2 (2): 122-29.
16. Light, J. 2008. Taking games seriously. Technology and Culture 48:28.
17. Lobo, Daniel G. 2007. Playing with urban life: How SimCity influences planning culture. In Space time play: Computer games, architecture, and urbanism: The next level, ed. F. V. Borries, S. P. Walz, and M. Böttger. Boston, MA: Birkhauser Verlag AG.
18. McCullough, Malcolm, William J. Mitchell, and Patrick Purcell, eds. 1990. The electronic design studio: Architectural knowledge and media in the computer era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Sanoff, Henry. 1979. Design games. Experimental ed. Los Altos, CA: W. Kaufmann.
20. Schon, Donald A. 1984. The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action. Journal of Architectural Education 38 (1): 2-9.
21. Shaffer, David Williamson. 2005. Epistemic games. Innovate: Journal of Online Education. http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=79 (accessed March 18, 2009).
22. Sutton-Smith, B. 1997. The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Yin, Robert K. 2002. Case study research, design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Wilson, Forrest. 1975. City planning; the games of human settlement. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.