Scholarly blogging practice as situated genre: An analytical framework based on genre theory

Information Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Kjellberg, Sara ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350072247     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aïmeur, E., Brassard, G. & Paquet, S. (2005). Personal knowledge publishing: fostering interdisciplinary communication. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(2), 46-53.
2. Askehave, I. & Nielsen, A.E. (2005). Digital genres: a challenge to traditional genre theory. Information, Technology & People, 18(2), 120-141.
3. Bachnik, W., Szymczyk, S., Leszczyński, P., Podsiadło, R., Rymszewicz, E., Kuryło, L. et al. (2006). Quantitative and sociological analysis of blog networks. Acta Physica Polonica B, 36(10), 2435-2446.
4. Bruns, A. & Jacobs, J. (2006). Uses of blogs. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
5. Davies, J. and Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: academic blogging as new literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies sampler, (pp. 167-198). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
6. Ekström, A. (2004). Vetenskaperna, medierna, publikerna. [The sciences, media and audiences] In A. Ekström (Ed.), Den mediala vetenskapen (pp. 9-31). Nora, Sweden: Nya Doxa förlag.
7. Erickson, T. (1997). Social interaction on the Net: virtual community as participatory genre. Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6, 13-21.
8. Erickson, T. (2000). Making sense of computer-mediated communication (CMC): conversations as genres, CMC systems as genre ecologies. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 3, 3011.
9. Efimova, L. & de Moor, A. (2005). Beyond personal Webpublishing: an exploratory study of conversational blogging practices. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 107a.
10. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ixGteOFE)
11. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j5kJRucD)
12. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j5kTSre8)
13. Kjellberg, S. (forthcoming). Bloggar som gränssnitt mellan flera världar: en fallstudie av den svenska akademiska bloggosfären. [Blogs as interface between several worlds: a case study of the Swedish academic blogosphere] Accepted for publication in Human IT.
14. Kling, R. & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1306-1320.
15. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Kumar, R., Novak, J., Raghavan, P. & Tomkins, A. (2005). On the bursty evolution of blogspace. World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems, 8(2), 159-178.
17. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lewenstein, B. (1995). Science and the Media. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies, (pp. 343-59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j5kefNe3)
20. Luzón, M. J. (2009). Scholarly hyperwriting: the function of links in academic Weblogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(1), 75-89.
21. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-67.
22. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j9YtAGiO)
23. Nardi, B. Schiano, D., Gumbrecht M & Swartz L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41-46.
24. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j9ZB0FBo)
25. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j9ZLv8gb)
26. Shepherd, M. & Watters, C. (1998). The evolution of cybergenres. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2, 97-109.
27. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Talja, S. & Fry, J. (2007). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 115-133.
30. Todoroki, S., Konishi, T. & Inoue, S. (2006). Blog-based research notebook: personal informatics workbench for high-throughput experimentation. Applied Surface Science, 252(7), 2640-2645.
31. Van Doorn N., Van Zoonen L. & Wyatt S. (2007). Writing from experience: presenting of gender identity on Weblogs. European Journal of Women's Studies, 14(2), 143-158.
32. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j9ZWVrdp)
33. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5j9Zhnhmq)
34. Wouters, P. & Beaulieu, A. (2006). Imagining e-science beyond computation. In C. Hine (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: understanding e-science, (pp. 48-70). London: Information Science Publishing.
35. Yates, J. & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.