An artifact model for projects conforming to Enterprise Architecture

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 15 LNBIP, Issue , 2008, Pages 30-46

  Foorthuis, Ralph ^a   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^b   Bos, Rik ^b  

^a STATISTICS NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Analysis and design artifacts; Enterprise architecture; Project conformance; Projects; Systems development

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS; STANDARDIZATION;

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARTIFACTS; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; PROJECT CONFORMANCE; PROJECTS; SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN ARTIFACTS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 70350061955     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89218-2_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Enterprise Architecture Analysis and Application. An Exploratory Study. In: EDOC Workshop TEAR Proceedings (2006
2. The Open Group: TOGAF. Version 8.1 Enterprise Edition (2003
3. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise architecture at work. Modelling, communication and analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2005
4. Pulkkinen, M., Hirvonen, A.: EA Planning, Development and Management Process for Agile Enterprise Development. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS (2005
5. Wagter, R., Berg, M., van den Luijpers, J., van Steenbergen, M.: Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: How to Make It Work. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2005
6. Merriam-Webster, Online Dictionary (accessed September 3, 2008), http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/artifact
7. Capgemini: Enterprise, Business and IT Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework (accessed October 27, 2007), http://www.capgemini.com/ services/ soa/ent-architecture/enterprise-arch/
8. Pulkkinen, M.: Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning. Four Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS (2006
9. Bandara, W., Indulska, M., Chong, S., Sadiq, S.: Major Issues in Business Process Management: An Expert Perspective. In: ECIS 2007 Proceedings (2007
10. Foorthuis, R.M., Brinkkemper, S.: A Framework for Local Project Architecture in the Context of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3(4), 51-63 (2007
11. Foorthuis, R.M., Brinkkemper, S.: Best Practices for Business and Systems Analysis in Projects Conforming to Enterprise Architecture. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures 3(1), 36-47 (2008
12. Box, S., Platt, K.: Business Process Management: Establishing and Maintaining Project Alignment. Business Process Management Journal 11(4), 370-387 (2005
13. Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 3rd edn. Project Management Institute, Inc., Pennsylvania (2004
14. Ambler, S.W., Nalbone, J., Vizdos, M.J.: The Enterprise Unified Process: Extending the Rational Unified Process. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2005
15. Engeström, Y.: Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki (1987
16. Kuutti, K.: Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research. In: Nardi, B. (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, pp. 17-44. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995
17. Bardram, J.: Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 89-98 (1998
18. Barthelmess, P., Anderson, K.M.: A View of Software Development Environments Based on Activity Theory. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11(1-2), (2002
19. Kuutti, K.: The Concept of activity as a basic unit of analysis for CSCW research. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on CSCW, pp. 249-264. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991
20. Foorthuis, R.M., Brinkkemper, S.: A Process Model for Project Members Conforming to Enterprise Architecture. Technical Report, Utrecht University (2008), http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/techreps/repo/CS-2008/2008-023.pdf
21. Rational: Rational Unified Process. Version 2003.06.00.65. Rational (2003
22. Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L.C., Gregory, J.: Coordination, cooperation, and communication in the courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. In: Cole, M., Engeström, Y., Vasquez, O. (eds.) Mind, culture, and activity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997
23. Engeström, Y.: Developmental Work Research: Reconstructing Expertise Through Expansive Learning. In: Nurminen, M.I., Weir, G.R.S. (eds.) Human Jobs and Computer Interfaces. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam (1991
24. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process. An Introduction, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003
25. Baskerville, R.L.: Investigating Information Systems With Action Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2, Article 19 (1999
26. Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G., Kock, N.: Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal 14(1), 65-86 (2004