Retrospective review of voluntary reports of nonsurgical paresthesia in dentistry

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Gaffen, Andrew S ^a   Haas, Daniel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PRILOCAINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD; CHIN; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJECTION; INJURY; INNERVATION; LINGUAL NERVE; LIP DISEASE; MALE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE BLOCK; PARESTHESIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; TONGUE DISEASE; VOLUNTARY PROGRAM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CANADA; CARTICAINE; CHILD; CHIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS; LINGUAL NERVE; LIP DISEASES; MALE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE BLOCK; PARESTHESIA; PRILOCAINE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; TONGUE DISEASES; VOLUNTARY PROGRAMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350058916     PISSN: 07098936     EISSN: 14882159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Malamed SF. Local anesthetics: dentistry's most important drugs, clinical update 2006. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(12):971-6.
2. Naguib M, Magboul MM, Samarkandi AH, Attia M. Adverse effects and drug interactions associated with local and regional anaesthesia. Drug Saf. 1998;18(4):221-50.
3. Aldrete JA, Johnson DA. Evaluation of intracutaneous testing for investigation of allergy to local anesthetic agents. Anesth Analg. 1970;49(1):173-83.
4. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004.
5. Haas DA. Localized complications from local anesthesia. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1998;26(9):677-82.
6. Haas DA, Lennon D. A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995;61(4):319-20,323-6,329-30.
7. Hillerup S, Jensen R. Nerve injury caused by mandibular block analgesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(5):437-43.
8. Pogrel MA, Thamby S. Permanent nerve involvement resulting from inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(7):901-7.
9. Pogrel MA, Schmidt BL. Trigeminal nerve chemical neurotrauma from injectable materials. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2001;13(2):247-53.
10. Smith MH, Lung KE. Nerve injuries after dental injection: a review of the literature. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(6):559-64.
11. Haas DA. Articaine and paresthesia: epidemiological studies. J Am Coll Dent. 2006;73(3):5-10.
12. Malamed SF. Articaine versus lidocaine: the author responds. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35(6):383-5.
13. Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks-an update to include articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35(4):271-3.
14. Miller PA, Haas DA. Incidence of local anesthetic-induced neuropathies in Ontario from 1994-1998 (abstract 3869). J Dent Res. 2000;79(special issue):627.
15. Gaffen AS, Haas DA. Survey of local anesthetic use by Ontario dentists. J Can Dent Assoc. Forthcoming 2009.
16. Peltier B, Dower JS Jr. The ethics of adopting a new drug: articaine as an example. J Am Coll Dent. 2006;73(3):11-20.
17. Sandstedt P, Sorensen S. Neurosensory disturbances of the trigeminalnerve: a long-term follow-up of traumatic injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(5):498-505.
18. Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11(2):133-42.
19. Weir R, Browne G, Tunks E, Gafni A, Roberts J. Gender differences in psychosocial adjustment to chronic pain and expenditures for health care services used. Clin J Pain. 1996;12(4):277-90.
20. Tall JM, Stuesse SL, Cruce WL, Crisp T. Gender and the behavioral manifestations of neuropathic pain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;68(1):99-104.
21. Pogrel MA, Schmidt BL, Sambajon V, Jordan RC. Lingual nerve damage due to inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a possible explanation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(2):195-9.
22. Harn SD, Durham TM. Incidence of lingual nerve trauma and postinjection complications in conventional mandibular block anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121(4):519-23.
23. Legarth J. Skader på nervus lingualis opstået i forbindelse med mandibularanalgesi-anmeldt til Dansk Tandlægeforenings Patientskadeforsikring 2002-2004. Tandlægebladet. 2005;109:786-8. [In Danish, English summary.] Available: http://arkiv.tandlaegebladet.dk/multimedia/ TB-2005-10-786.pdf (accessed 2009 Sept 11).
24. Rawlins MD. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions. I: The data. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;26(1):1-5.
25. Stricker BH, Tijssen JG. Serum sickness-like reactions to cefaclor. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(10):1177-84.
26. Risk management guide - a handbook for Ontario dentists. Toronto: Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario. 2nd printing; October 2008. Available: www.rcdso.org/pubs/Risk-Management-Guide-Oct%202008.pdf (accessed 2009 Sept 11).
27. Eisenach JC, Yaksh TL. Safety in numbers: how do we study toxicity of spinal analgesics? Anesthesiology. 2002;97(5):1047-9.
28. Potocnik I, Tomsic M, Sketelj J, Bajrovic FF. Articaine is more effective than lidocaine or mepivacaine in rat sensory nerve conduction block in vitro. J Dent Res. 2006;85(2):162-6.
29. Hintze A, Paessler L. Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry-a randomised double-blind study. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10(2):145-50.