Process- and context-sensitive research on academic knowledge practices: Developing CASS-tools and methods

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 541-543

  Muukkonen, Hanni ^a   Hakkarainen, Kai ^a   Kosonen, Kari ^a   Jalonen, Satu ^a   Heikkilä, Annamari ^a   Lonka, Kirsti ^a   Salmela Aro, Katariina ^b   Linnanen, Juha ^c   Salo, Kari ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c HELSINKI METROPOLIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3G MOBILE; ACROSS TIME; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; PILOT STUDIES; SAMPLING SYSTEMS; WORKING PRACTICES;

HARMONIC ANALYSIS; SURVEYS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 70350046840     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Alexander, P.A. (2002). In the year 2020: envisioning the possibilities for educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 39, 149-156.
2. Bolger, N., Davis, A., Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larson, R. (1987) Validity and reliability of the Experience-sampling method. The Journal of the Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536.
4. Elo, A-L., Leppänen, A., & Jahkola A. (2003). Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment Health, 29(6), 444-451.
5. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
6. Gale, T. (2002). Degrees of difficulty: an ecological account of learning in Australian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 65-78.
7. Hakkarainen, K., Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Muukkonen, H., Toiviainen, H., Markkanen, H., and Richter, C. (2006). Design Principles and Practices for the Knowledge Practices Laboratory (KP-Lab) project. In W. Nejdl and K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing. Proceedings of the first European Conference on Technology- Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 603-608). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
8. Marton, F & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum. Higher Education Research, 19, 380-395.
9. Quinn, J. (2004). Understanding working-class "drop-out" from higher education through sociocultural lens: cultural narratives and local contexts. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14, 57-74.
10. Reis, H. T., Gable, S. L. (2000). Event sampling and other methods for studying daily experience. In H. T. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Schmitz, B. (1990). Univariate and multivariate time-series models: the analysis of intraindividual varaibility and intraindividual relationships. In A. von Eye (Ed.) Statistical methods in longitudinal research, Vol. II (pp. 351-386). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Säljö, R. (1997). Talk as data and practice - a critical look at phenomenographic inguiry and the appeal to experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 173-190.
13. Wenger, W. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.