Can prolonged sick leave after gynecologic surgery be predicted? An observational study in the Netherlands

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2237-2241

  Brölmann, Hans A M ^a   Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie ^a   Bruinvels, David J ^a   De Vet, Riekie H C ^a   Dirksz, Amarantha A ^a   Huirne, Judith A F ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gynecology; Laparoscopy; Postoperative recovery; Quality of life; Sick leave

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LEAVE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECOVERY INDEX 10; RECOVERY INDEX 6; SURGICAL APPROACH;

EID: 70350025415     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0287-0     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. M Ellstrom J Ferraz-Nunes M Hahlin JH Olsson 1998 A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy Obstet Gynecol 91 30 34 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00579-6 1:STN:280: DyaK1c7isVelsQ%3D%3D 9464716 (Pubitemid 28042328)
2. JH Olsson M Ellstrom M Hahlin 1996 A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103 345 350 1:STN:280:DyaK287ot1Wltw%3D%3D 8605132
3. M Ottesen C Moller H Kehlet B Ottesen 2001 Substantial variability in postoperative treatment and convalescence recommendations following vaginal repair: a nationwide questionnaire study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80 1062 1068 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801119.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnltF2htw%3D%3D 11703209 (Pubitemid 33052225)
4. KB Kluivers JC Hendriks BW Mol MY Bongers ME Vierhout HA Brolmann, et al. 2008 Clinimetric properties of 3 instruments measuring postoperative recovery in a gynecologic surgical population Surgery 144 12 21 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03. 027 18571580
5. PS Myles JO Hunt H Fletcher R Solly D Woodward S Kelly 2001 Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery Anesthesiology 95 862 867 10.1097/00000542-200110000-00013 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrmtVSktA%3D%3D 11605925
6. AW Majeed S Brown N Williams DR Hannay AG Johnson 1995 Variations in medical attitudes to postoperative recovery period BMJ 311 296 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzlvFOrtA%3D%3D 7633239
7. JA Deprest MG Munro PR Koninckx 1995 Review on laparoscopic hysterectomy Zentralbl Gynakol 117 641 651 1:STN:280:DyaK287ktFertg%3D%3D 8585359
8. RE Richardson N Bournas AL Magos 1995 Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet 345 36 41 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91158-8 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FpslKruw%3D%3D 7799707
9. T Bisgaard B Klarskov J Rosenberg H Kehlet 2001 Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg 136 917 921 10.1001/archsurg.136.8.917 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvmtVOhsw%3D%3D 11485527
10. M Ottesen M Sorensen H Kehlet B Ottesen 2003 Short convalescence after vaginal prolapse surgery Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82 359 366 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00147.x 12716321 (Pubitemid 36570720)
11. KB Kluivers NP Johnson P Chien ME Vierhout M Bongers BW Mol 2008 Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136 3 8 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.004 18063290