Supersaturated design for screening factors influencing the preparation of sulfated amides of olive pomace oil fatty acids

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-78

  Rais, F ^a   Kamoun, A ^a   Chaabouni, M ^a   Claeys Bruno, M ^b   Phan Tan Luu, R ^c   Sergent, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SFAX   (Tunisia)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c LPRAI   (France)

Author keywords

All subset regressions; Olive pomace oil; Ridge regression; Screening; Sulfated fatty amides; Supersaturated design

Indexed keywords

ALKALI; AMIDE; ESTER; FATTY ACID DERIVATIVE; METHANOL; OLIVE OIL; REAGENT; SODIUM DERIVATIVE; SULFUR DERIVATIVE;

AMIDATION; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); METHODOLOGY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 70349992425     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rais F., Baati R., Damak N., Kamoun A., and Chaabouni M. The use of a eutectic mixture of olive fatty amides to easily prepare sulfated amides applied as lime soap dispersants. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 85 (2008) 869-877
2. Linfield M. Soap and lime soap dispersants. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 55 (1978) 87-92
3. Bistline R.G., Noble W.R., Smith F.D., and Linfield W.M. Cosulfation of fatty acid alkanolamides and lower molecular weight alcohols. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 54 (1977) 371-374
4. Goupy J. Introduction aux plans d'expériences. fourth ed. (2009), Dunod, Paris
5. Plackett R.L., and Burman J.P. Design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33 (1943) 305-325
6. Lin D.K.J. A new class of supersaturated designs. Technometrics 35 (1993) 28-31
7. Bettonvil B., and Kleijnen J.P.C. Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors: sequential bifurcation. European Journal of Operational Research 96 (1997) 180-194
8. Patel M.S. Group-screening with more than two stages. Technometrics 4 (1962) 209-217
9. Satterwaithe F. Random balance experimentation (with discussion). Technometrics 1 (1959) 111-137
10. Booth K.H.V., and Cox D.R. Some systematic supersaturated designs. Technometrics 4 (1962) 489-495
11. Lu X., and Wu X. A strategy of searching active factors in supersaturated screening experiments. Journal of quality technology 36 4 (2004) 392-399
12. Claeys-Bruno M., Dobrijevic M., Phan-Tan-Luu R., and Sergent M. A new class of supersaturated design: application to a sensitivity study of a photochemical model. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 95 (2009) 86-93
13. Dejaegher B., and Vander Heyden Y. Supersaturated designs: set-ups, data interpretation, and analytical application. Analytical Bioanalytical Chemistry 390 (2008) 1227-1240
14. Yamada S. Selection of active factors by stepwise regression in the data analysis of supersaturated design. Quality Engineering 16 4 (2004) 501-513
15. Cela R., Phan-Tan-Luu R., and Claeys-Bruno M. Screening strategies. In: Brown S.D., Tauler R., and Walczak B. (Eds). Comprehensive Chemometrics (2009), Elsevier, Amsterdam 251-300 Chapter 1.10
16. Derksen S., and Keselman H. Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms: frequency of obtaining authentic and noise variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 45 (1992) 265-282
17. Beattie S.D., Fong D.K.H., and Lin D.K.J. A two-stage Bayesian model selection. Strategy for supersaturated designs. Technometrics 44 (2002) 55-63
18. D. Mathieu, J. Nony, R. Phan-Tan-Luu, NEMROD-W software v2000, LPRAI, Editor. 2006, Marseille, France.
19. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (1974) 716-723
20. Vander Heyden Y., and Massart D.L. Review of the use of robustness and ruggedness in analytical chemistry. In: Hendriks M.W.B., de Boer J.H., and Smilde A.K. (Eds). Robustness of Analytical Chemical Methods and Pharmaceutical Technological Products (1996), Elsevier, Amsterdam 79-147