Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions

Design Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 704-720

  Lilley, Debra ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

design techniques; environmental design; user behaviour

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PROFESSIONALS; DESIGN TECHNIQUES; DOCTORAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES; USER BEHAVIOUR;

RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN;

EID: 70349990137     PISSN: 0142694X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akrich M. The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker W.E., and Law J. (Eds). Shaping technology: building society (1992), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 205-224
2. Arroyo, E, Bonanni, L and Selker, T (2005) Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the Sink, in: CHI 2005, Portland, OR, USA, 2nd-7th April 2005
3. Lilley, D (2007) Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design, doctoral thesis, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, UK
4. Lilley, D, Bhamra, T and Lofthouse, V (2006) Towards sustainable use: an exploration of designing for behavioural change, in: Design and semantics of form and movement DeSForM 2006 Evoluon, Eindhoven 26th-27th October 2006
5. Baines J., and Morgan B. Sustainability appraisal: a social perspective. In: Datal-Clayton B., and Sadler B. (Eds). Sustainability appraisal: a review of international experience and practice (2004), International Institute for Environment and Development, London First Draft of Work in Progress
6. Berdichevsky D., and Neuenschwander E. Towards an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM Vol 42 No 5 (1999) 51-58
7. Bhamra, T and Lofthouse, V (2007) Design for sustainability: a practical approach Gower, UK
8. Bhamra, T A, Lilley, D and Tang, T (2008) Sustainable use: changing consumer behaviour through product design, in: Changing the change: design visions, proposals and tools, Turin, Italy, 10th-12th July 2008
9. Colantonio, A (2007) Social sustainability: an exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods, metrics and tools, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development, 2007/01: EIBURS Working Paper Series, July 2007
10. Darby, S (2001) Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption, in: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, Italian Association of Energy Economists/EC-SAVE programme
11. DeVries M.J. Ethics and the complexity of technology: a design approach. Philosophia Reformata. International Scientific Journal of the Association for Reformational Philosophy Vol 71 No 2 (2006) 118-131
12. Elias, E W A, Dekoninck, E A and Culley, S J C (2008) Assessing user behaviour for changes in the design of energy using domestic products, in: IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (ISEE), San Francisco, CA, US, 19th-22nd May
13. Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business (1997), Capstone, Oxford
14. Fogg B.J. Persuasive technology; using computers to change what we think and do (2003), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
15. Hopper R. Telephone conversation (1992), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indianapolis
16. Jelsma J., and Knot M. Designing environmentally efficient services; a 'script' approach. Journal of Sustainable Product Design Vol 2 (2002) 119-130
17. Lewis H., Gertsakis J., Grant T., Morelli N., and Sweatman A. Design +environment (2001), Greenleaf, Sheffield, UK
18. Lasen, A (2004) Affective technologies - emotion and mobile phones, Reciever, 11, Vodaphone.
19. Lockton D., Harrison D., and Stanton N. Making the user more efficient: design for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering Vol 1 No 1 (2008) 3-8
20. McCalley L.T. From motivation and cognition theories to everyday applications and back again: the case of product-integrated information and feedback. Energy Policy Vol 34 No 2 (2006) 129-137
21. McCalley L.T., and Midden C.J.H. Making energy feedback work. In: Verbeek P.P., and Slob A. (Eds). User behavior and technology development: shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies (2006), Springer, The Netherlands 127-135
22. Papanek V. Design for the real world: human ecology and social change (1971), Pantheon Books, New York
23. Polese M., and Stren R. The social sustainability of cities: diversity and the management of change (2000), University of Toronto Press, Toronto
24. Scott, F (2004) Behaviour change - believing you can make a difference! in: BTCV, Global Action Plan and The Environment Council Workshop, London 20th July 2004.
25. Siegle, L (2006) Your home may be hurting the planet, Guardian Unlimited, Thursday 8th June 2006.
26. Sinner, J, Baines, J, Crengle, H, Salmon, G, Fenemor, A and Tipa, G (2004) Sustainable development: a summary of key concepts, Ecologic Research, Report No. 2.
27. Wever R., van Kuijk J., and Boks C. User-centred design for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering Vol 1 No 1 (2008) 9-20