An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer technique improved at grazing incidence for the viscoelastic wave equation

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 179, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 333-344

  Martin, Roland ^a   Komatitsch, Dimitri ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PAU ET DES PAYS DE L'ADOUR   (France)

^b INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

Computational seismology; Elasticity and inelasticity; Numerical solutions; Seismic attenuation; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC WAVE; SEISMOLOGY; VISCOELASTICITY; WAVE EQUATION; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 70349989276     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04278.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abarbanel S, Gottlieb D, Hesthaven JS. Long time behavior of the perfectly matched layer equations in computational electromagnetics. J. Scient. Comput. 2002, 17(1-4):405-422.
2. Bécache E, Joly P. On the analysis of Bérenger's perfectly matched layers for Maxwell's equations. Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 2002, 36(1):87-120.
3. Bécache E, Petropoulos PG, Gedney SG. On the long-time behavior of unsplit perfectly matched layers. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2004, 52(5):1335-1342.
4. Bérenger JP. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 114:185-200.
5. Carcione JM. Seismic modeling in viscoelastic media. Geophysics 1993, 58(1):110-120.
6. Carcione JM. Wave Fields in Real Media: Theory and Numerical Simulation of Wave Propagation in Anisotropic, Anelastic, Porous and Electromagnetic Media 2007, 2nd edn, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
7. Carcione JM, Kosloff D, Kosloff R. Wave propagation simulation in a linear viscoelastic medium. Geophys. J. Int. 1988, 95:597-611.
8. Cerjan C, Kosloff D, Kosloff R, Reshef M. A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equation. Geophysics 1985, 50:705-708.
9. Chew WC, Liu Q. Perfectly matched layers for elastodynamics: a new absorbing boundary condition. J. Comput. Acoust. 1996, 4(4):341-359.
10. Chew WC, Weedon WH. A 3-D perfectly matched medium from modified Maxwell's equations with stretched coordinates. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 1994, 7(13):599-604.
11. Clayton R, Engquist B. Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1977, 67:1529-1540.
12. Cohen G, Fauqueux S. Mixed spectral finite elements for the linear elasticity system in unbounded domains. SIAM J. Scient. Comput. 2005, 26(3):864-884.
13. Collino F, Monk P. The perfectly matched layer in curvilinear coordinates. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 1998, 19(6):2061-2090.
14. Collino F, Tsogka C. Application of the PML absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media. Geophysics 2001, 66(1):294-307.
15. Courant R, Friedrichs KO, Lewy H. Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik. Mathematische Annalen 1928, 100:32-74.
16. Dong L, She D, Guan L, Ma Z. An eigenvalue decomposition method to construct absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. J. geophys. Eng. 2005, 2:192-198.
17. Drossaert FH, Giannopoulos A. A nonsplit complex frequency-shifted PML based on recursive integration for FDTD modeling of elastic waves. Geophysics 2007, 72(2):T9-T17.
18. Emmerich H, Korn M. Incorporation of attenuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields. Geophysics 1987, 52:1252-1264.
19. Engquist B, Majda A. Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Math. Comp. 1977, 31:629-651.
20. Festa G, Vilotte JP. The Newmark scheme as velocity-stress time-staggering: an efficient PML implementation for spectral-element simulations of elastodynamics. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 161:789-812.
21. Festa G, Delavaud E, Vilotte JP. Interaction between surface waves and absorbing boundaries for wave propagation in geological basins: 2D numerical simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32(20):L20306. doi
22. Gedney SD, Taflove A. The Perfectly Matched Layer absorbing medium. Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method 1998, 263-343. in, Chap. 5, pp, ed, Artech House, Boston, USA
23. Givoli D. Non-reflecting boundary conditions: review article. J. Comput. Phys. 1991, 94:1-29.
24. Grote MJ. Nonreflecting boundary conditions for elastodynamics scattering. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 161:331-353.
25. Guddati MN, Lim KW. Continued fraction absorbing boundary conditions for convex polygonal domains. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2006, 66(6):949-977.
26. Hagstrom T, Hariharan SI. A formulation of asymptotic and exact boundary conditions using local operators. Appl. Num. Math. 1998, 27:403-416.
27. Higdon RL. Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves. Geophysics 1991, 56:231-241.
28. Komatitsch D, Martin R. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 2007, 72(5):SM155-SM167.
29. Komatitsch D, Tromp J. Introduction to the spectral-element method for 3-D seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int. 1999, 139(3):806-822.
30. Komatitsch D, Tromp J. A perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition for the second-order seismic wave equation. Geophys. J. Int. 2003, 154(1):146-153.
31. Liu HP, Anderson DL, Kanamori H. Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity: implications for seismology and mantle composition. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 1976, 47:41-58.
32. Luebbers RJ, Hunsberger F. FDTD for Nth-order dispersive media. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1992, 40(11):1297-1301.
33. Ma S, Liu P. Modeling of the perfectly matched layer absorbing boundaries and intrinsic attenuation in explicit finite-element methods. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96(5):1779-1794.
34. Martin R, Komatitsch D, Ezziani A. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for seismic wave equation in poroelastic media. Geophysics 2008a, 73(4):T51-T61.
35. Martin R, Komatitsch D, Gedney SD. A variational formulation of a stabilized unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer for the isotropic or anisotropic seismic wave equation. Comput. Modell. Eng. Sci. 2008b, 37(3):274-304.
36. Moczo P, Kristek J. On the rheological models used for time-domain methods of seismic wave propagation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L01306.
37. Moczo P, Robertsson J, Eisner L, Wu R-S, Maupin V. The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation. Advances in Wave Propagation in Heterogeneous Media 2007, Vol. 48:421-516. in, chap. 8, pp, eds, Advances in Geophysics, Elsevier - Academic Press
38. Peng CB, Töksoz MN. An optimal absorbing boundary condition for elastic wave modeling. Geophysics 1995, 60:296-301.
39. Quarteroni A, Tagliani A, Zampieri E. Generalized Galerkin approximations of elastic waves with absorbing boundary conditions. Comput. Meth. appl. Mech. Eng. 1998, 163:323-341.
40. Roden JA, Gedney SD. Convolution PML (CPML): an efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS-PML for arbitrary media. Microw.Opt. Technol. Lett. 2000, 27(5):334-339.
41. Sochacki J, Kubichek R, George J, Fletcher WR, Smithson S. Absorbing boundary conditions and surface waves. Geophysics 1987, 52(1):60-71.
42. Stacey R. Improved transparent boundary formulations for the elastic wave equation. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1988, 78(6):2089-2097.
43. Zeng YQ, He JQ, Liu QH. The application of the perfectly matched layer in numerical modeling of wave propagation in poroelastic media. Geophysics 2001, 66(4):1258-1266.