Deriving preference order of post-mining land-uses through MLSA framework: Application of an outranking technique

Environmental Geology

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 877-888

  Soltanmohammadi, Hossein ^a   Osanloo, Morteza ^a   Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani ^a,b  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

AHP; Evaluation attributes; Mined land suitability analysis (MLSA); Multi attribute decision making (MADM); Post mining land use; PROMETHEE

Indexed keywords

AHP; EVALUATION ATTRIBUTES; MINED LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS (MLSA); MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING (MADM); POST-MINING LAND-USE; PROMETHEE;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AVIONICS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LAND USE; MINING;

DECISION MAKING;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GAUSSIAN METHOD; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; LAND USE; MINING;

EID: 70349979009     PISSN: 09430105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-008-1563-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alexander MJ (1996) The effectiveness of small-scale irrigated agriculture in the reclamation of mine land soils on the Jos Plateau of Nigeria. Land Degrad Dev 7:77-85.
2. Bascetin A (2007) A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine. Environ Geol 52:663-672.
3. Brans JP, Vincke PH, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228-238.
4. Dagdeviren M (2008) Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J Intell Manufac. http://www.springerlink.com/content/a73223877g716720/?.
5. Eddie WL, Hang L, Danny CK (2002) Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); a defective tool when used improperly. Meas Bus Excell 6:33-37.
6. Escobar MT, Aguaron J, Moreno-Jimenez JM (2004) A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. Eur J Oper Res 153:318-322.
7. Forman E, Peniwati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108:165-169.
8. Goumas M, Lygerou V (2000) An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. Eur J Oper Res 123:606-613.
9. Hong IB, Vogel DR (1991) Data and model management in a genera1ized MCDM-DSS. Decis Sci 22:1-25.
10. Joerin F, Theriault M, Musy A (2001) Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15:153-174.
11. Keyser W, Peeters P (1996) A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 89:457-461.
12. Lewi PL, Hoof JV (1992) Multicriteria decision making using Pareto optimality and PROMETHEE preference ranking. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 16:139-144.
13. Macharis C, Brans JP, Mareschal B (1998) The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure. J Decis Syst 7:283-307.
14. Macharis C, Springael J, Brucker KD, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP; the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153:307-317.
15. Mousseau V, Roy B (2005) PROMETHEE methods, multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York, pp 163-195.
16. Naresh SI (2003) A family of dominance rules for multiattribute decision making under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 33:441-450.
17. Osanloo M, Hekmat A, Aghajani Bazazi A (2006) Reclamation of granite stone quarry-a case study in Jostan Granite Mine, Tehran, Iran. In: 1st international seminar on mine closure, Perth, Australia.
18. Parreiras RO, Vasconcelos JA (2007) A multiplicative version of PROMETHEE II applied to multiobjective optimization problems. Eur J Oper Res 183:729-740.
19. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1994) Decision making in economic, political, social, and technological environments with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
20. Soltanmohammadi H, Osanloo M, Aghajani A (2008) Developing a fifty-attribute framework for mined land suitability analysis using AHP-TOPSIS approach. In: Post-mining symposium, Nancy, France.
21. Uberman R, Ostre{ogonek}ga A (2005) Applying the analytic hierarchy process in the revitalization of post-mining areas field. In: ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii.
22. Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks.