The effectiveness of source code obfuscation: An experimental assessment

IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 178-187

  Ceccato, Mariano ^a   Di Penta, Massimiliano ^d   Nagra, Jasvir ^e   Falcarin, Paolo ^c   Ricca, Filippo ^b   Torchiano, Marco ^c   Tonella, Paolo ^a  

^a ITC IRST   (Italy)

^b DISI   (Italy)

^c POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Empirical studies; Program comprehension; Software obfuscation

Indexed keywords

CODE OBFUSCATION; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; EFFECT OF FACTORS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS; JAVA CODES; PROGRAM COMPREHENSION; PROTECTION MECHANISMS; SOFTWARE OBFUSCATION; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SOURCE CODES;

REENGINEERING; REVERSE ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 70349977389     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPC.2009.5090041     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. B. Anckaert, M. Madou, B. D. Sutter, B. D. Bus, K. D. Bosschere, and B. Preneel. Program obfuscation: a quantitative approach. In QoP '07: Proc. of the 2007 ACM Workshop on Quality of protection, pages 15-20, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
2. B. Barak, O. Goldreich, R. Impagliazzo, S. Rudich, A. Sahai, S. Vadhan, and K. Yang. On the (im) possibility of obfuscating programs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2139:19-23, 2001.
3. M. Ceccato, M. Di Penta, J. Nagra, P. Falcarin, F. Ricca, M. Torchiano, and P. Tonella. Towards experimental evaluation of code obfuscation techniques. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Quality of Protection, pages 39-46. ACM, Oct 2008.
4. M. Ceccato, M. Di Penta, J. Nagra, P. Falcarin, F. Ricca, M. Torchiano, and P. Tonella. The effectiveness of source code obfuscation: an experimental assessment. Technical report, University of Sannio - http://www.rcost. unisannio.it/mdipenta/icpc09-tr.pdf, Jan 2009.
5. J. Cohen. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
6. C. Collberg, C. Thomborson, and D. Low. A taxonomy of obfuscating transformations. Technical Report 148, Dept. of Computer Science, The Univ. of Auckland, 1997.
7. C. Collberg, C. Thomborson, and D. Low. Watermarking, tamper-proofing, and obfuscation - tools for software protection. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28, 2002.
8. H. Goto, M. Mambo, K. Matsumura, and H. Shizuya. An approach to the objective and quantitative evaluation of tamper-resistant software. In Third Int. Workshop on Information Security (ISW2000), pages 82-96. Springer, 2000.
9. A. N. Oppenheim. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Pinter, London, 1992.
10. D. Sheskin. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures (4th Ed.). Chapman & All, 2007.
11. I. Sutherland, G. E. Kalb, A. Blyth, and G. Mulley. An empirical examination of the reverse engineering process for binary files. Computers & Security, 25(3):221-228, 2006.
12. S. Udupa, S. Debray, and M. Madou. Deobfuscation: reverse engineering obfuscated code. Reverse Engineering, 12th Working Conference on, Nov. 2005.
13. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén. Experimentation in Software Engineering - An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.