The classification systems of the EQ-5D, the HUI II and the SF-6D: What do they have in common?

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1249-1261

  Konerding, Uwe ^a   Moock, Jörn ^b   Kohlmann, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classification; Health; Measurement; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH STATUS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SHORT FORM 36; VARIMAX ROTATION;

FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION CENTERS;

EID: 70349973779     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9525-8     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. R Brooks The EuroQol Group 1996 EuroQol: The current state of play Health Policy 37 1 53 72 10158943 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 (Pubitemid 26191458)
2. P Dolan 1997 Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states Medical Care 35 11 1095 1108 9366889 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002
3. D Feeny W Furlong M Boyle GW Torrance 1995 Multi-attribute health status classification systems Pharmacoeconomics 7 6 490 502 10155335 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004
4. WJ Furlong DH Feeny GW Torrance RD Barr 2001 The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies Annals of Medicine 33 5 375 384 11491197 10.3109/07853890109002092
5. J Brazier J Roberts M Deverill 2002 The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 Journal of Health Economics 21 2 271 292 11939242 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8 (Pubitemid 34143147)
6. J Brazier T Usherwood R Harper K Thomas 1998 Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 1115 1128 9817129 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00103-6 (Pubitemid 28527167)
7. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Incorporated.
8. JE Ware CD Sherbourne 1992 The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) Medical Care 30 6 473 483 1593914 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
9. JA Michaels JE Brazier WB Campbell JB MacIntyre SJ Palfreyman J Ratcliffe 2006 Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins The British Journal of Surgery 93 2 175 181 16432825 10.1002/bjs.5264 (Pubitemid 43259601)
10. YK Teng RJ Verburg JK Sont WB van den Hout FC Breedveld JM van Laar 2005 Long-term followup of health status in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Arthritis and Rheumatism 52 8 2272 2276 16052541 10.1002/art.21219 (Pubitemid 41117409)
11. WB van den Hout Z de Jong M Munneke JM Hazes FC Breedveld TP Vliet Vlieland 2005 Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses of a long-term, high-intensity exercise program compared with conventional physical therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis and Rheumatism 53 1 39 47 15696568 10.1002/art.20903 (Pubitemid 40216350)
12. GR Barton J Bankart AC Davis 2005 A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures International Journal of Audiology 44 3 157 163 15916116 10.1080/ 14992020500057566 (Pubitemid 40694911)
13. GR Barton J Bankart AC Davis QA Summerfield 2004 Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision: Results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3 2 103 105 15702947 10.2165/00148365-200403020-00006 (Pubitemid 41018308)
14. J Brazier J Roberts A Tsuchiya J Busschbach 2004 A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups Health Economics 13 9 873 884 15362179 10.1002/hec.866 (Pubitemid 39264234)
15. B Conner-Spady ME Suarez-Almazor 2003 Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments Medical Care 41 7 791 801 12835603 10.1097/00005650-200307000-00003
16. M Espallargues CJ Czoski-Murray NJ Bansback J Carlton GM Lewis LA Hughes CS Brand JE Brazier 2005 The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 46 11 4016 4023 16249475 10.1167/iovs.05-0072 (Pubitemid 44264600)
17. D Feeny L Wu K Eng 2004 Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients Quality of Life Research 13 10 1659 1670 15651537 10.1007/s11136-004-6189-2 (Pubitemid 41215246)
18. P Franks J Hanmer DG Fryback 2006 Relative disutilities of 47 risk factors and conditions assessed with seven preference-based health status measures in a national U.S. sample: toward consistency in cost-effectiveness analyses Medical Care 44 5 478 485 16641667 10.1097/01.mlr.0000207464.61661.05
19. G Hawthorne J Richardson NA Day 2001 A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments Annals of Medicine 33 5 358 370 11491195 10.3109/07853890109002090
20. LM Lamers CA Bouwmans A van Straten MC Donker L Hakkaart 2006 Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients Health Economics 15 11 1229 1236 16625671 10.1002/hec.1125 (Pubitemid 44696950)
21. N Luo JA Johnson JW Shaw D Feeny SJ Coons 2005 Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Medical Care 43 11 1078 1086 16224300 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182493. 57090.c1 (Pubitemid 41587593)
22. CA Marra JM Esdaile D Guh JA Kopec JE Brazier BE Koehler A Chalmers AH Anis 2004 A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis Medical Care 42 11 1125 1131 15586840 10.1097/00005650- 200411000-00012
23. CM McDonough MR Grove TD Tosteson JD Lurie AS Hilibrand AN Tosteson 2005 Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants Quality of Life Research 14 5 1321 1332 16047507 10.1007/s11136-004-5743-2 (Pubitemid 40895754)
24. J Moock T Kohlmann 2008 Comparing preference-based quality-of-life measures: results from rehabilitation patients with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or psychosomatic disorders Quality of Life Research 17 3 485 495 18288590 10.1007/s11136-008-9317-6
25. BJ O'Brien M Spath G Blackhouse JL Severens P Dorian J Brazier 2003 A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index Health Economics 12 11 975 981 14601159 10.1002/hec.789 (Pubitemid 37407341)
26. S Petrou C Hockley 2005 An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population Health Economics 14 11 1169 1189 15942981 10.1002/hec.1006 (Pubitemid 41645379)
27. AS Pickard JA Johnson DH Feeny 2005 Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke Quality of Life Research 14 1 207 219 15789955 10.1007/s11136-004-3928-3 (Pubitemid 40249095)
28. A Siderowf B Ravina HA Glick 2002 Preference-based quality-of-life in patients with Parkinson's disease Neurology 59 1 103 108 12105315
29. K Stavem SS Froland KB Hellum 2005 Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS Quality of Life Research 14 4 971 980 16041894 10.1007/s11136-004-3211-7 (Pubitemid 40685221)
30. A Szende K Svensson E Ståhl A Mészáros GY Berta 2004 Psychometric and utility-based measures of health status of asthmatic patients with different disease control level Pharmacoeconomics 22 8 537 547 15217309 10.2165/00019053-200422080-00005 (Pubitemid 38858296)
31. Thomas K.J., MacPherson H., Ratcliffe J., Thorpe L., Brazier J., Campbell M., Fitter M., Roman M., Walters S., Nicholl J. P. (2005). Longer term clinical and economic benefits of offering acupuncture care to patients with chronic low back pain. Health Technology Assessment, 9(32), iii-iv, ix-x, 1-109.
32. van Stel H.F., Buskens E. (2006). Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 25, 4:20.
33. A Kopec KD Willison 2003 A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56 317 325 12767408 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00609-1 (Pubitemid 36593310)
34. CM McDonough AN Tosteson 2007 Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making Pharmacoeconomics 25 2 93 106 17249853 10.2165/00019053-200725020-00003 (Pubitemid 46175547)
35. GW Torrance DH Feeny WJ Furlong RD Barr Y Zhang Q Wang 1996 Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system-Health Utilities Index Mark 2 Medical Care 34 7 702 722 8676608 10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004
36. S Bryan L Longworth 2005 Measuring health-related utility: Why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D? European Journal of Health Economics 6 3 253 260 15968563 10.1007/s10198-005-0299-9 (Pubitemid 41638849)
37. F Anagnostopoulos D Niakas E Pappa 2005 Construct validation of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey Quality of Life Research 14 8 1959 1965 16155784 10.1007/s11136-005-3866-8 (Pubitemid 41279619)
38. FA Augustovski G Lewin EG Elorrio A Rubinstein 2008 The Argentine-Spanish SF-36 Health Survey was successfully validated for local outcome research Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61 12 1279 1284 18786809 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2008.05.004
39. J Beals TK Welty CM Mitchell DA Rhoades JL Yeh JA Henderson SM Manson DS Buchwald 2006 Different factor loadings for SF36: The strong heart study and the national survey of functional health status Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59 2 208 215 16426957 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.010 (Pubitemid 43111625)
40. S Fukuhara S Bito J Green A Hsiao K Kurokawa 1998 Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 1037 1044 9817121 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00095-X (Pubitemid 28527159)
41. S Fukuhara JE Ware Jr M Kosinski S Wada B Gandek 1998 Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 1045 1053 9817122 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00096-1 (Pubitemid 28527160)
42. M Hann D Reeves 2008 The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores Quality of Life Research 17 3 413 423 18259888 10.1007/s11136-008-9310-0
43. C Jenkinson S Stewart-Brown S Petersen C Paice 1999 Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 53 1 46 50 10326053 10.1136/jech.53.1.46
44. N Lewin-Epstein T Sagiv-Schifter EL Shabtai A Shmueli 1998 Validation of the 36-item short-form Health Survey (Hebrew version) in the adult population of Israel Medical Care 36 9 1361 1370 9749659 10.1097/00005650-199809000-00008
45. L Li HM Wang Y Shen 2003 Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57 4 259 263 12646540 10.1136/jech.57.4.259 (Pubitemid 36399113)
46. D Maslić Sersić G Vuletić 2006 Psychometric evaluation and establishing norms of Croatian SF-36 health survey: Framework for subjective health research Croatian Medical Journal 47 1 95 102 16489702
47. CA McHorney JE Ware Jr AE Raczek 1993 The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Medical Care 31 3 247 263 8450681 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006
48. G Mishra MJ Schofield 1998 Norms for the physical and mental health component summary scores of the SF-36 for young, middle-aged and older Australian women Quality of Life Research 7 3 215 220 9584551 10.1023/A:1008821913429 (Pubitemid 28180040)
49. A Montazeri A Goshtasebi M Vahdaninia B Gandek 2005 The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version Quality of Life Research 14 3 875 882 16022079 10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5 (Pubitemid 40576872)
50. RW Sanson-Fisher JJ Perkins 1998 Adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Australia Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 961 967 9817113 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00087-0 (Pubitemid 28527151)
51. J Thumboo KY Fong D Machin SP Chan KH Leon PH Feng ST Thio ML Boe 2001 A community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore Quality of Life Research 10 2 175 188 11642688 10.1023/A:1016701514299 (Pubitemid 32885695)
52. JE Ware Jr B Gandek M Kosinski NK Aaronson G Apolone J Brazier M Bullinger S Kaasa A Leplège L Prieto M Sullivan K Thunedborg 1998 The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 1167 1170 9817134 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5 (Pubitemid 28527172)
53. JE Ware Jr M Kosinski B Gandek NK Aaronson G Apolone P Bech J Brazier M Bullinger S Kaasa A Leplège L Prieto M Sullivan 1998 The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 1159 1165 9817133 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00107-3 (Pubitemid 28527171)
54. CH Wu KL Lee G Yao 2007 Examining the hierarchical factor structure of the SF-36 Taiwan version by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 6 889 900 18070259
55. ML Essink-Bot PF Krabbe GJ Bonsel NK Aaronson 1997 An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument Medical Care 35 5 522 537 9140339 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00008
56. IC Huang CC Hwang MY Wu W Lin W Leite AW Wu 2008 Diabetes-specific or generic measures for health-related quality of life? Evidence from psychometric validation of the D-39 and SF-36 Value in Health 11 3 450 461 18489668 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00261.x (Pubitemid 351720807)
57. IC Huang AW Wu C Frangakis 2006 Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population Quality of Life Research 15 1 15 24 16411027 10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9 (Pubitemid 43097584)
58. CJ Meijer AH Schene MW Koeter 2002 Quality of life in schizophrenia measured by the MOS SF-36 and the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile: A comparison Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 105 4 293 300 11942934 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1198.x (Pubitemid 34275847)
59. Furlong, W. J., Feeny, D. H., Torrance, G. W. (2002). Health utilities index (HUI) procedures manual. Dundas Ontario Canada: Health Utilities Incorporation.
60. Brazier J., Walters S. (2003). SF-6D UK Programme. SPSS-Syntax. 24 October 2003.
61. Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley.
62. Brachinger, H. W., Ost, F. (1996). Modelle mit latenten Variablen: Faktorenanalyse, Latent-Structure-Analyse und LISREL-Analyse [Models with latent variables: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis and LISREL analysis]. In L. Fahrmeir, A. Hamerle, G. Tutz (Eds.), Multivariate statistische Verfahren, 2. erweiterte Auflage [Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd extended edition] (pp. 639-766). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
63. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
64. Munro, B. H. (1997). Regression. In B. H. Munro (Ed.), Statistical methods in health care (pp. 246-286). Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott.
65. R Grieve M Grishchenko J Cairns 2009 SF-6D versus EQ-5D: Reasons for differences in utility scores and impact on reported cost-utility European Journal of Health Economy 10 15 23 10.1007/s10198-008-0097-2